Stockhub

Editing Talk:Stockhub

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 20: Line 20:
:Received further feedback from the same person:
:Received further feedback from the same person:


:* The peers cannot be publicly listed companies. When asked why they cannot be publicly listed companies, no reason was provided.
:* The peers cannot be publicly listed companies.  
:* When asked why they cannot be publicly listed companies, no reason was provided.
:* The peers need to offer the same offering (i.e. investment research, ideally free-to-access investment research).
:* The peers need to offer the same offering (i.e. investment research, ideally free-to-access investment research).
:* Potential peers are Finbit (https://finbit.io) and Marketsmith (https://marketsmith.investors.com). I checked Finbit's website and it isn't really an investment research/information provider (it's a financial information gatherer and analyser), so it's not really a competitor of the Stockhub platform. Marketsmith, on the other hand, is an investment information/research provider and, therefore, is a peer of Stockhub.
:* Potential peers are Finbit (https://finbit.io) and Marketsmith (https://marketsmith.investors.com).
:* On a side note, the person said that he thinks that even if a company provides free-to-access investment research that is materially better, in terms of quality, than Goldmans Sachs, an institutional investor, such as Blackrock, will not use it, because 1) it's free and 2) the investor probably already has a relationship with Goldmans Sachs. No reason why provided as to why he thinks that, and my view is that his thinking is illogical and, therefore, it's best to ignore his thinking.
:* On a side note, the person said that he thinks that even if a company provides free-to-access investment research that is materially better, in terms of quality, than Goldmans Sachs, an institutional investor, such as Blackrock, will not use it, because 1) it's free and 2) the investor probably already has a relationship with Goldmans Sachs. No reason why provided as to why he thinks that, and my view is that his thinking is illogical and, therefore, it's best to ignore his thinking.


:{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+ Competition comparison
|+ Competition comparison
|-
|-
Line 89: Line 90:
"The audience is Investors. An investor is anyone who is willing and able to make an investment."
"The audience is Investors. An investor is anyone who is willing and able to make an investment."


I feel the target audience is too broad, and needs to be narrower. I feel a better target audience is the following: people who are willing and able to be actively involved in the process of finding suitable investments (i.e. Active Investors). The report has now been updated to reflect that change.
I feel the target audience is too broad, and needs to be narrower. I feel a better target audience is the following: people who are willing and able to be actively involved in the process of deciding which investment(s) to invest in (i.e. Active Investors). The report has now been updated to reflect that change.


--[[Special:Contributions/109.180.63.162|109.180.63.162]] 10:35, 24 March 2022 (GMT)
--[[Special:Contributions/109.180.63.162|109.180.63.162]] 10:35, 24 March 2022 (GMT)
== Finimize valuation multiple ==
{| class="wikitable"
|+
!Year
!4
!5
!6
|-
!Period end date
!31/12/2020
!31/12/2021
!31/12/2022
|-
!Period duration (days)
!488
!365
!365
|-
!
!Historic
!Historic
!Historic
|-
! colspan="4" |Profit and loss
|-
|Revenue (£)
|1,392,200
|2,349,976
|3,896,226
|-
! colspan="4" |Balance sheet
|-
|Cash (£)
|
|1,910,058
|5,306,680
|-
|Debt (£)
|
|13,206,430
|3,717,599
|-
! colspan="4" |Other information
|-
|Adjusted revenue (£)
|1,044,150
|2,349,976
|3,896,226
|-
|Revenue growth rate (%)
|
|68.80%
|65.80%
|-
|Adjusted revenue growth rate (%)
|
|125.06%
|65.80%
|}
{| class="wikitable"
|+Acquisition multiple
!
!
!Comments
|-
|Acquisition price ($)
|99,000,000
|
|-
|FX rate
|0.82
|The exchange rate today (29th October 2023. It's better to use the fx rate of the date of the acquisition (i.e. 29th October 2021).
|-
|Acquisition price (£)
|81,180,000
|
|-
|2021 cash (£)
|1,910,058
|
|-
|2021 debt (£)
|13,206,430
|
|-
|2021 revenue (£)
|2,349,976
|The acquisition occurred on 29th October 2021.
|-
|Adjusted revenue growth rate (%)
|125.06%
|
|-
|Growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple (x)
|0.28
|
|}
{| class="wikitable"
|+
!Input
!Value
|-
|Current revenue (£)
|3,896,226
|-
|Revenue growth rate (%)
|65.80%
|-
|Growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple (x)
|0.19
|-
|Enterprise value (£)
|48,710,617
|-
|Current cash (£)
|5,306,680
|-
|Current debt (£)
|3,717,599
|-
|Market capitalisation (£)
|50,299,698
|-
|Acquisition price ($)
|99,000,000
|-
|FX rate
|0.82
|-
|Acquisition price (£)
|81,180,000
|-
|Overvalued/(undervalued)(%)
|61.39%
|}
[[Special:Contributions/95.149.241.208|95.149.241.208]] 15:33, 29 October 2023 (GMT)
Please note that all contributions to Stockhub may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Stockhub:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)
Retrieved from ‘https://stockhub.co/research/Talk:Stockhub’