Stockhub

Editing Talk:Tesla, Inc.

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
== Lack of References ==
Many recent edits lack proper citations. To ensure the accuracy and authenticity of the information, please provide references by August 18, 2023. Without them, the content may be subject to removal. [[User:Manos|Manos]] ([[User talk:Manos|talk]]) 11:06, 13 August 2023 (BST)
==General Feedback==
{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|+Feedback
|+Feedback
Line 16: Line 11:
|Anonymous 1
|Anonymous 1
| The mentioned repeated information has been removed and/or updated, so I think this issue has been fixed now.
| The mentioned repeated information has been removed and/or updated, so I think this issue has been fixed now.
|Manos
|Anonymous 3
|-
|-
|2
|2
Line 22: Line 17:
|Anonymous 1
|Anonymous 1
|It’s unclear to me who exactly are the target audiences of Tesla’s offerings, so the target audience descriptions have been removed, so I think this issue is fixed now.
|It’s unclear to me who exactly are the target audiences of Tesla’s offerings, so the target audience descriptions have been removed, so I think this issue is fixed now.
|Manos
|Anonymous 3
|-
|-
|3
|3
Line 28: Line 23:
|Anonymous 1
|Anonymous 1
|Many words have been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed.  
|Many words have been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed.  
|Manos
|Anonymous 3
|-
|-
|4
|4
Line 34: Line 29:
|Anonymous 1
|Anonymous 1
|The description of a car has been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
|The description of a car has been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
|Manos
|Anonymous 3
|-
|-
|5
|5
Line 40: Line 35:
|Anonymous 1
|Anonymous 1
|Some of the sub-headings have been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
|Some of the sub-headings have been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
|Manos
|Anonymous 3
|-
|-
|6
|6
Line 46: Line 41:
|Anonymous 1
|Anonymous 1
|Two of the categories have been updated now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
|Two of the categories have been updated now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
|Manos
|Anonymous 3
|-
|-
|7
|7
Line 52: Line 47:
|Anonymous 1
|Anonymous 1
|Different can be good, so I think there is nothing to fix here.
|Different can be good, so I think there is nothing to fix here.
|Manos
|Anonymous 3
|-
|-
|8
|8
Line 58: Line 53:
|Anonymous 1
|Anonymous 1
|Checked now, and $10 is correct, so I think this issue has been fixed.  
|Checked now, and $10 is correct, so I think this issue has been fixed.  
|Manos
|Anonymous 3
|-
|-
|9
|9
Line 64: Line 59:
|Anonymous 1
|Anonymous 1
|Personally, I think the valuation is clear and simple, so I think unless more people provide the same feedback, then it's best to keep it how it is. Also, the layout is optimised for both mobile and desktop viewing, whereas many other reports are optimised for desktop viewing only. Note, a later version of the Stockhub platform will enable users to amend the underlying assumptions of the financial model, and I think that will help to make the valuation clearer and simpler.  
|Personally, I think the valuation is clear and simple, so I think unless more people provide the same feedback, then it's best to keep it how it is. Also, the layout is optimised for both mobile and desktop viewing, whereas many other reports are optimised for desktop viewing only. Note, a later version of the Stockhub platform will enable users to amend the underlying assumptions of the financial model, and I think that will help to make the valuation clearer and simpler.  
|Manos
|Anonymous 3
|-
|-
|10
|10
Line 70: Line 65:
|Anonymous 1
|Anonymous 1
|Given the above fixes, I think this issue has been fixed now.
|Given the above fixes, I think this issue has been fixed now.
|Manos
|Anonymous 3
|-
|-
|11
|11
Line 76: Line 71:
|Anonymous 1
|Anonymous 1
|Given the above fixes, I think this issue has been fixed now.
|Given the above fixes, I think this issue has been fixed now.
|Manos
|Anonymous 3
|-
|-
|12
|12
Line 82: Line 77:
|Anonymous 1
|Anonymous 1
|The latest significant update on the company is in relation to the company’s first quarter results, and the results have been included in the report now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
|The latest significant update on the company is in relation to the company’s first quarter results, and the results have been included in the report now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
|Manos
|Anonymous 3
|-
|-
|13  
|13  
Line 88: Line 83:
|Anonymous 1
|Anonymous 1
|Information about the earnings have been added now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
|Information about the earnings have been added now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
|Manos
|Anonymous 3
|-
|-
| 14
| 14
Line 94: Line 89:
|Anonymous 1
|Anonymous 1
|I think this issue has been fixed now.
|I think this issue has been fixed now.
|Manos
|Anonymous 3
|-
|-
|15
|15
Line 100: Line 95:
|Anonymous 1
|Anonymous 1
|I think unless more people provide the same feedback, then it's best to keep the word how it is.
|I think unless more people provide the same feedback, then it's best to keep the word how it is.
|Manos
|Anonymous 3
|-
|-
|16
|16
Line 106: Line 101:
|Anonymous 1
|Anonymous 1
|An explanation about the reason behind using 60 years is provided in the report. Without knowing why the person thinks 60 years is questionable, it's almost impossible to know whether the issue is fixed or not. That said, a later version of the Stockhub platform will enable users to amend the underlying assumptions of the financial model.
|An explanation about the reason behind using 60 years is provided in the report. Without knowing why the person thinks 60 years is questionable, it's almost impossible to know whether the issue is fixed or not. That said, a later version of the Stockhub platform will enable users to amend the underlying assumptions of the financial model.
|Manos
|Anonymous 3
|-
|-
|17
|17
|It was a good and comprehensive report. I found the detail of all the cars a bit long so I wonder if you can somehow shorten that part or maybe have it as an appendix. The overall company assessment and financials is the most relevant / interesting bit. Overall, the quality of the report is 9 (out of 10).
|It was a good and comprehensive report. I found the detail of all the cars a bit long so I wonder if you can somehow shorten that part or maybe have it as an appendix. The overall company assessment and financials is the most relevant / interesting bit.
|Anonymous 2
|Anonymous 2
|It's unclear to me which cars details you're referring to. I think you're referring to the competition comparison bit? If so, that's now been moved to the appendix section of the report, so I think the issue is now fixed.
|Which cars details do you think is best to remove/move to the appendix?
|Manos
|Anonymous 3
|-
|18
| The report looks good overall. I don’t like the colour coding on the tables, but I get that it is to indicate positive or the better option in that particular field. I like that you have listed out risks around the company. I would rate the overall quality of the report 6.5 (out of 10). Why? Because I just found it a little difficult to read given the amount of information (I think this is because I was using my mobile device and it’s smaller, so difficult on small screen)
|Anonymous 4
|You don't like the colour coding on the tables. Is your suggestion to remove it? There's an underlying suggestion from your feedback that the report is too long, is that correct? Some of the information has now been moved to the appendix section of the report, so I think that issue is now fixed.
|Manos
|}
|}
Please note that all contributions to Stockhub may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Stockhub:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)
Retrieved from ‘https://stockhub.co/research/Talk:Tesla,_Inc.’