Editing Talk:Tesla, Inc.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
|+Feedback | |+Feedback | ||
Line 16: | Line 11: | ||
|Anonymous 1 | |Anonymous 1 | ||
| The mentioned repeated information has been removed and/or updated, so I think this issue has been fixed now. | | The mentioned repeated information has been removed and/or updated, so I think this issue has been fixed now. | ||
| | |Anonymous 3 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|2 | |2 | ||
Line 22: | Line 17: | ||
|Anonymous 1 | |Anonymous 1 | ||
|It’s unclear to me who exactly are the target audiences of Tesla’s offerings, so the target audience descriptions have been removed, so I think this issue is fixed now. | |It’s unclear to me who exactly are the target audiences of Tesla’s offerings, so the target audience descriptions have been removed, so I think this issue is fixed now. | ||
| | |Anonymous 3 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|3 | |3 | ||
Line 28: | Line 23: | ||
|Anonymous 1 | |Anonymous 1 | ||
|Many words have been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed. | |Many words have been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed. | ||
| | |Anonymous 3 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|4 | |4 | ||
Line 34: | Line 29: | ||
|Anonymous 1 | |Anonymous 1 | ||
|The description of a car has been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed. | |The description of a car has been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed. | ||
| | |Anonymous 3 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|5 | |5 | ||
Line 40: | Line 35: | ||
|Anonymous 1 | |Anonymous 1 | ||
|Some of the sub-headings have been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed. | |Some of the sub-headings have been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed. | ||
| | |Anonymous 3 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|6 | |6 | ||
Line 46: | Line 41: | ||
|Anonymous 1 | |Anonymous 1 | ||
|Two of the categories have been updated now, so I think this issue has been fixed. | |Two of the categories have been updated now, so I think this issue has been fixed. | ||
| | |Anonymous 3 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|7 | |7 | ||
Line 52: | Line 47: | ||
|Anonymous 1 | |Anonymous 1 | ||
|Different can be good, so I think there is nothing to fix here. | |Different can be good, so I think there is nothing to fix here. | ||
| | |Anonymous 3 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|8 | |8 | ||
Line 58: | Line 53: | ||
|Anonymous 1 | |Anonymous 1 | ||
|Checked now, and $10 is correct, so I think this issue has been fixed. | |Checked now, and $10 is correct, so I think this issue has been fixed. | ||
| | |Anonymous 3 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|9 | |9 | ||
Line 64: | Line 59: | ||
|Anonymous 1 | |Anonymous 1 | ||
|Personally, I think the valuation is clear and simple, so I think unless more people provide the same feedback, then it's best to keep it how it is. Also, the layout is optimised for both mobile and desktop viewing, whereas many other reports are optimised for desktop viewing only. Note, a later version of the Stockhub platform will enable users to amend the underlying assumptions of the financial model, and I think that will help to make the valuation clearer and simpler. | |Personally, I think the valuation is clear and simple, so I think unless more people provide the same feedback, then it's best to keep it how it is. Also, the layout is optimised for both mobile and desktop viewing, whereas many other reports are optimised for desktop viewing only. Note, a later version of the Stockhub platform will enable users to amend the underlying assumptions of the financial model, and I think that will help to make the valuation clearer and simpler. | ||
| | |Anonymous 3 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|10 | |10 | ||
Line 70: | Line 65: | ||
|Anonymous 1 | |Anonymous 1 | ||
|Given the above fixes, I think this issue has been fixed now. | |Given the above fixes, I think this issue has been fixed now. | ||
| | |Anonymous 3 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|11 | |11 | ||
Line 76: | Line 71: | ||
|Anonymous 1 | |Anonymous 1 | ||
|Given the above fixes, I think this issue has been fixed now. | |Given the above fixes, I think this issue has been fixed now. | ||
| | |Anonymous 3 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|12 | |12 | ||
Line 82: | Line 77: | ||
|Anonymous 1 | |Anonymous 1 | ||
|The latest significant update on the company is in relation to the company’s first quarter results, and the results have been included in the report now, so I think this issue has been fixed. | |The latest significant update on the company is in relation to the company’s first quarter results, and the results have been included in the report now, so I think this issue has been fixed. | ||
| | |Anonymous 3 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|13 | |13 | ||
Line 88: | Line 83: | ||
|Anonymous 1 | |Anonymous 1 | ||
|Information about the earnings have been added now, so I think this issue has been fixed. | |Information about the earnings have been added now, so I think this issue has been fixed. | ||
| | |Anonymous 3 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 14 | | 14 | ||
Line 94: | Line 89: | ||
|Anonymous 1 | |Anonymous 1 | ||
|I think this issue has been fixed now. | |I think this issue has been fixed now. | ||
| | |Anonymous 3 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|15 | |15 | ||
Line 100: | Line 95: | ||
|Anonymous 1 | |Anonymous 1 | ||
|I think unless more people provide the same feedback, then it's best to keep the word how it is. | |I think unless more people provide the same feedback, then it's best to keep the word how it is. | ||
| | |Anonymous 3 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|16 | |16 | ||
Line 106: | Line 101: | ||
|Anonymous 1 | |Anonymous 1 | ||
|An explanation about the reason behind using 60 years is provided in the report. Without knowing why the person thinks 60 years is questionable, it's almost impossible to know whether the issue is fixed or not. That said, a later version of the Stockhub platform will enable users to amend the underlying assumptions of the financial model. | |An explanation about the reason behind using 60 years is provided in the report. Without knowing why the person thinks 60 years is questionable, it's almost impossible to know whether the issue is fixed or not. That said, a later version of the Stockhub platform will enable users to amend the underlying assumptions of the financial model. | ||
| | |Anonymous 3 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|17 | |17 | ||
|It was a good and comprehensive report. I found the detail of all the cars a bit long so I wonder if you can somehow shorten that part or maybe have it as an appendix. The overall company assessment and financials is the most relevant / interesting bit | |It was a good and comprehensive report. I found the detail of all the cars a bit long so I wonder if you can somehow shorten that part or maybe have it as an appendix. The overall company assessment and financials is the most relevant / interesting bit. | ||
|Anonymous 2 | |Anonymous 2 | ||
| | |Which cars details do you think is best to remove/move to the appendix? Please feel free to make the change yourself or communicate it here. | ||
|Anonymous 3 | |||
| | |||
|} | |} |