Talk:Tesla, Inc. - Revision history

Manos at 10:07, 13 August 2023

2023-08-13T10:07:20Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {| class="wikitable sortable"
 |+Feedback
@@ Line 115: / Line 120: @@
 |Manos
 |}

Manos: /* Lack of References */ new section

2023-08-13T10:06:40Z

Lack of References: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:06, 13 August 2023
Line 115:		Line 115:
	\|Manos		\|Manos
	\|}		\|}

			== Lack of References ==

			Many recent edits lack proper citations. To ensure the accuracy and authenticity of the information, please provide references by August 18, 2023. Without them, the content may be subject to removal. [[User:Manos\|Manos]] ([[User talk:Manos\|talk]]) 11:06, 13 August 2023 (BST)

Manos: Manos moved page Talk:Tesla to Talk:Tesla, Inc. without leaving a redirect

2022-07-31T09:38:19Z

Manos moved page Talk:Tesla to Talk:Tesla, Inc. without leaving a redirect

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:38, 31 July 2022
(No difference)

Manos at 14:21, 21 June 2022

2022-06-21T14:21:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:21, 21 June 2022
Line 104:		Line 104:
	\|-		\|-
	\|17		\|17
	\|It was a good and comprehensive report. I found the detail of all the cars a bit long so I wonder if you can somehow shorten that part or maybe have it as an appendix. The overall company assessment and financials is the most relevant / interesting bit.		\|It was a good and comprehensive report. I found the detail of all the cars a bit long so I wonder if you can somehow shorten that part or maybe have it as an appendix. The overall company assessment and financials is the most relevant / interesting bit. Overall, the quality of the report is 9 (out of 10).
	\|Anonymous 2		\|Anonymous 2
	\|It's unclear to me which cars details you're referring to. I think you're referring to the competition comparison bit? If so, that's now been moved to the appendix section of the report, so I think the issue is now fixed.		\|It's unclear to me which cars details you're referring to. I think you're referring to the competition comparison bit? If so, that's now been moved to the appendix section of the report, so I think the issue is now fixed.

Manos at 13:54, 21 June 2022

2022-06-21T13:54:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:54, 21 June 2022
Line 11:		Line 11:
	\|Anonymous 1		\|Anonymous 1
	\| The mentioned repeated information has been removed and/or updated, so I think this issue has been fixed now.		\| The mentioned repeated information has been removed and/or updated, so I think this issue has been fixed now.
	\|~~Anonymous 3~~		\|Manos
	\|-		\|-
	\|2		\|2
Line 17:		Line 17:
	\|Anonymous 1		\|Anonymous 1
	\|It’s unclear to me who exactly are the target audiences of Tesla’s offerings, so the target audience descriptions have been removed, so I think this issue is fixed now.		\|It’s unclear to me who exactly are the target audiences of Tesla’s offerings, so the target audience descriptions have been removed, so I think this issue is fixed now.
	\|~~Anonymous 3~~		\|Manos
	\|-		\|-
	\|3		\|3
Line 23:		Line 23:
	\|Anonymous 1		\|Anonymous 1
	\|Many words have been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed.		\|Many words have been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
	\|~~Anonymous 3~~		\|Manos
	\|-		\|-
	\|4		\|4
Line 29:		Line 29:
	\|Anonymous 1		\|Anonymous 1
	\|The description of a car has been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed.		\|The description of a car has been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
	\|~~Anonymous 3~~		\|Manos
	\|-		\|-
	\|5		\|5
Line 35:		Line 35:
	\|Anonymous 1		\|Anonymous 1
	\|Some of the sub-headings have been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed.		\|Some of the sub-headings have been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
	\|~~Anonymous 3~~		\|Manos
	\|-		\|-
	\|6		\|6
Line 41:		Line 41:
	\|Anonymous 1		\|Anonymous 1
	\|Two of the categories have been updated now, so I think this issue has been fixed.		\|Two of the categories have been updated now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
	\|~~Anonymous 3~~		\|Manos
	\|-		\|-
	\|7		\|7
Line 47:		Line 47:
	\|Anonymous 1		\|Anonymous 1
	\|Different can be good, so I think there is nothing to fix here.		\|Different can be good, so I think there is nothing to fix here.
	\|~~Anonymous 3~~		\|Manos
	\|-		\|-
	\|8		\|8
Line 53:		Line 53:
	\|Anonymous 1		\|Anonymous 1
	\|Checked now, and $10 is correct, so I think this issue has been fixed.		\|Checked now, and $10 is correct, so I think this issue has been fixed.
	\|~~Anonymous 3~~		\|Manos
	\|-		\|-
	\|9		\|9
Line 59:		Line 59:
	\|Anonymous 1		\|Anonymous 1
	\|Personally, I think the valuation is clear and simple, so I think unless more people provide the same feedback, then it's best to keep it how it is. Also, the layout is optimised for both mobile and desktop viewing, whereas many other reports are optimised for desktop viewing only. Note, a later version of the Stockhub platform will enable users to amend the underlying assumptions of the financial model, and I think that will help to make the valuation clearer and simpler.		\|Personally, I think the valuation is clear and simple, so I think unless more people provide the same feedback, then it's best to keep it how it is. Also, the layout is optimised for both mobile and desktop viewing, whereas many other reports are optimised for desktop viewing only. Note, a later version of the Stockhub platform will enable users to amend the underlying assumptions of the financial model, and I think that will help to make the valuation clearer and simpler.
	\|~~Anonymous 3~~		\|Manos
	\|-		\|-
	\|10		\|10
Line 65:		Line 65:
	\|Anonymous 1		\|Anonymous 1
	\|Given the above fixes, I think this issue has been fixed now.		\|Given the above fixes, I think this issue has been fixed now.
	\|~~Anonymous 3~~		\|Manos
	\|-		\|-
	\|11		\|11
Line 71:		Line 71:
	\|Anonymous 1		\|Anonymous 1
	\|Given the above fixes, I think this issue has been fixed now.		\|Given the above fixes, I think this issue has been fixed now.
	\|~~Anonymous 3~~		\|Manos
	\|-		\|-
	\|12		\|12
Line 77:		Line 77:
	\|Anonymous 1		\|Anonymous 1
	\|The latest significant update on the company is in relation to the company’s first quarter results, and the results have been included in the report now, so I think this issue has been fixed.		\|The latest significant update on the company is in relation to the company’s first quarter results, and the results have been included in the report now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
	\|~~Anonymous 3~~		\|Manos
	\|-		\|-
	\|13		\|13
Line 83:		Line 83:
	\|Anonymous 1		\|Anonymous 1
	\|Information about the earnings have been added now, so I think this issue has been fixed.		\|Information about the earnings have been added now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
	\|~~Anonymous 3~~		\|Manos
	\|-		\|-
	\| 14		\| 14
Line 89:		Line 89:
	\|Anonymous 1		\|Anonymous 1
	\|I think this issue has been fixed now.		\|I think this issue has been fixed now.
	\|~~Anonymous 3~~		\|Manos
	\|-		\|-
	\|15		\|15
Line 95:		Line 95:
	\|Anonymous 1		\|Anonymous 1
	\|I think unless more people provide the same feedback, then it's best to keep the word how it is.		\|I think unless more people provide the same feedback, then it's best to keep the word how it is.
	\|~~Anonymous 3~~		\|Manos
	\|-		\|-
	\|16		\|16
Line 101:		Line 101:
	\|Anonymous 1		\|Anonymous 1
	\|An explanation about the reason behind using 60 years is provided in the report. Without knowing why the person thinks 60 years is questionable, it's almost impossible to know whether the issue is fixed or not. That said, a later version of the Stockhub platform will enable users to amend the underlying assumptions of the financial model.		\|An explanation about the reason behind using 60 years is provided in the report. Without knowing why the person thinks 60 years is questionable, it's almost impossible to know whether the issue is fixed or not. That said, a later version of the Stockhub platform will enable users to amend the underlying assumptions of the financial model.
	\|~~Anonymous 3~~		\|Manos
	\|-		\|-
	\|17		\|17
Line 107:		Line 107:
	\|Anonymous 2		\|Anonymous 2
	\|It's unclear to me which cars details you're referring to. I think you're referring to the competition comparison bit? If so, that's now been moved to the appendix section of the report, so I think the issue is now fixed.		\|It's unclear to me which cars details you're referring to. I think you're referring to the competition comparison bit? If so, that's now been moved to the appendix section of the report, so I think the issue is now fixed.
	\|~~Anonymous 3~~		\|Manos
	\|-		\|-
	\|18		\|18
Line 113:		Line 113:
	\|Anonymous 4		\|Anonymous 4
	\|You don't like the colour coding on the tables. Is your suggestion to remove it? There's an underlying suggestion from your feedback that the report is too long, is that correct? Some of the information has now been moved to the appendix section of the report, so I think that issue is now fixed.		\|You don't like the colour coding on the tables. Is your suggestion to remove it? There's an underlying suggestion from your feedback that the report is too long, is that correct? Some of the information has now been moved to the appendix section of the report, so I think that issue is now fixed.
	\|		\|Manos
	\|}		\|}

Manos at 13:52, 21 June 2022

2022-06-21T13:52:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:52, 21 June 2022
Line 106:		Line 106:
	\|It was a good and comprehensive report. I found the detail of all the cars a bit long so I wonder if you can somehow shorten that part or maybe have it as an appendix. The overall company assessment and financials is the most relevant / interesting bit.		\|It was a good and comprehensive report. I found the detail of all the cars a bit long so I wonder if you can somehow shorten that part or maybe have it as an appendix. The overall company assessment and financials is the most relevant / interesting bit.
	\|Anonymous 2		\|Anonymous 2
	\|~~Which~~ cars details do you think ~~is best~~ to ~~remove/move~~ to the appendix~~? Please feel free to make~~ the ~~change yourself or communicate it here~~.		\|It's unclear to me which cars details you're referring to. I think you're referring to the competition comparison bit? If so, that's now been moved to the appendix section of the report, so I think the issue is now fixed.
	\|Anonymous 3		\|Anonymous 3
	\|-		\|-
Line 112:		Line 112:
	\| The report looks good overall. I don’t like the colour coding on the tables, but I get that it is to indicate positive or the better option in that particular field. I like that you have listed out risks around the company. I would rate the overall quality of the report 6.5 (out of 10). Why? Because I just found it a little difficult to read given the amount of information (I think this is because I was using my mobile device and it’s smaller, so difficult on small screen)		\| The report looks good overall. I don’t like the colour coding on the tables, but I get that it is to indicate positive or the better option in that particular field. I like that you have listed out risks around the company. I would rate the overall quality of the report 6.5 (out of 10). Why? Because I just found it a little difficult to read given the amount of information (I think this is because I was using my mobile device and it’s smaller, so difficult on small screen)
	\|Anonymous 4		\|Anonymous 4
	\|		\|You don't like the colour coding on the tables. Is your suggestion to remove it? There's an underlying suggestion from your feedback that the report is too long, is that correct? Some of the information has now been moved to the appendix section of the report, so I think that issue is now fixed.
	\|		\|
	\|}		\|}

172.18.0.2 at 22:08, 20 June 2022

2022-06-20T22:08:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:08, 20 June 2022
Line 108:		Line 108:
	\|Which cars details do you think is best to remove/move to the appendix? Please feel free to make the change yourself or communicate it here.		\|Which cars details do you think is best to remove/move to the appendix? Please feel free to make the change yourself or communicate it here.
	\|Anonymous 3		\|Anonymous 3
			\|-
			\|18
			\| The report looks good overall. I don’t like the colour coding on the tables, but I get that it is to indicate positive or the better option in that particular field. I like that you have listed out risks around the company. I would rate the overall quality of the report 6.5 (out of 10). Why? Because I just found it a little difficult to read given the amount of information (I think this is because I was using my mobile device and it’s smaller, so difficult on small screen)
			\|Anonymous 4
			\|
			\|
	\|}		\|}

Manos at 14:30, 20 June 2022

2022-06-20T14:30:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:30, 20 June 2022
Line 106:		Line 106:
	\|It was a good and comprehensive report. I found the detail of all the cars a bit long so I wonder if you can somehow shorten that part or maybe have it as an appendix. The overall company assessment and financials is the most relevant / interesting bit.		\|It was a good and comprehensive report. I found the detail of all the cars a bit long so I wonder if you can somehow shorten that part or maybe have it as an appendix. The overall company assessment and financials is the most relevant / interesting bit.
	\|Anonymous 2		\|Anonymous 2
	\|Which cars details do you think is best to remove/move to the appendix?		\|Which cars details do you think is best to remove/move to the appendix? Please feel free to make the change yourself or communicate it here.
	\|Anonymous 3		\|Anonymous 3
	\|}		\|}

Manos at 14:23, 20 June 2022

2022-06-20T14:23:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 20 June 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{\| class="wikitable sortable"		{\| class="wikitable sortable"
	\|+		\|+Feedback
	!#		!#
	!Feedback		!Feedback
	!Feedback ~~reponse~~		!Feedback author
			!Feedback response
			!Feedback response author
	\|-		\|-
	\|1		\|1
	\|The report contains repeated information, such as Elon Musk's bio, the place(s) that the offerings are promoted and marketed.		\|The report contains repeated information, such as Elon Musk's bio, the place(s) that the offerings are promoted and marketed.
	\|The mentioned repeated information has been removed and/or updated, so I think this issue has been fixed now.		\|Anonymous 1
			\| The mentioned repeated information has been removed and/or updated, so I think this issue has been fixed now.
			\|Anonymous 3
	\|-		\|-
	\|2		\|2
	\|The description of the target audience seems inaccurate.		\|The description of the target audience seems inaccurate.
			\|Anonymous 1

	\|It’s unclear to me who exactly are the target audiences of Tesla’s offerings, so the target audience descriptions have been removed, so I think this issue is fixed now.		\|It’s unclear to me who exactly are the target audiences of Tesla’s offerings, so the target audience descriptions have been removed, so I think this issue is fixed now.
			\|Anonymous 3
	\|-		\|-
	\|3		\|3
	\|The report is wordy.		\|The report is wordy.
	\|Many words have been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed.		\|Anonymous 1
			\|Many words have been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
			\|Anonymous 3
	\|-		\|-
	\|4		\|4
	\|The report is too dumb-downed. For example, no need to describe what a car is.		\|The report is too dumb-downed. For example, no need to describe what a car is.
			\|Anonymous 1
	\|The description of a car has been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed.		\|The description of a car has been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
			\|Anonymous 3
	\|-		\|-
	\|5		\|5
	\|A suggestion is to remove some of the sub-headings.		\|A suggestion is to remove some of the sub-headings.
			\|Anonymous 1
	\|Some of the sub-headings have been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed.		\|Some of the sub-headings have been removed now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
			\|Anonymous 3
	\|-		\|-
	\|6		\|6
	\|One of the table includes one or more silly categories. For example, "is the car safe?"		\|One of the table includes one or more silly categories. For example, "is the car safe?"
			\|Anonymous 1
	\|Two of the categories have been updated now, so I think this issue has been fixed.		\|Two of the categories have been updated now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
			\|Anonymous 3
	\|-		\|-
	\|7		\|7
	\|The report is different to other reports.		\|The report is different to other reports.
			\|Anonymous 1
	\|Different can be good, so I think there is nothing to fix here.		\|Different can be good, so I think there is nothing to fix here.
			\|Anonymous 3
	\|-		\|-
	\|8		\|8
	\|Check that the minimum investment amount is indeed £10.		\|Check that the minimum investment amount is indeed £10.
	\|Checked now, and $10 is correct, so I think this issue has been fixed.		\|Anonymous 1
			\|Checked now, and $10 is correct, so I think this issue has been fixed.
			\|Anonymous 3
	\|-		\|-
	\|9		\|9
	\|The valuation of the investment is unclear and complex; make it clearer and simpler. See a high-quality research report for an example.		\| The valuation of the investment is unclear and complex; make it clearer and simpler. See a high-quality research report for an example.
	\|Personally, I think the valuation is clear and simple, so I think unless more people provide the same feedback, then it's best to keep it how it is. Also, the layout is optimised for both mobile and desktop viewing, whereas many other reports are optimised for desktop viewing only. Note, a later version of the Stockhub platform will enable users to amend the underlying assumptions of the financial model, and I think that will help to make the valuation clearer and simpler.		\|Anonymous 1
			\|Personally, I think the valuation is clear and simple, so I think unless more people provide the same feedback, then it's best to keep it how it is. Also, the layout is optimised for both mobile and desktop viewing, whereas many other reports are optimised for desktop viewing only. Note, a later version of the Stockhub platform will enable users to amend the underlying assumptions of the financial model, and I think that will help to make the valuation clearer and simpler.
			\|Anonymous 3
	\|-		\|-
	\|10		\|10
	\|The report seems robotic.		\|The report seems robotic.
			\|Anonymous 1
	\|Given the above fixes, I think this issue has been fixed now.		\|Given the above fixes, I think this issue has been fixed now.
			\|Anonymous 3
	\|-		\|-
	\|11		\|11
	\|I'd rate the quality of the report 2 out of 10.		\|I'd rate the quality of the report 2 out of 10.
			\|Anonymous 1
	\|Given the above fixes, I think this issue has been fixed now.		\|Given the above fixes, I think this issue has been fixed now.
			\|Anonymous 3
	\|-		\|-
	\|12		\|12
	\|Add to the report recent news.		\|Add to the report recent news.
			\|Anonymous 1
	\|The latest significant update on the company is in relation to the company’s first quarter results, and the results have been included in the report now, so I think this issue has been fixed.		\|The latest significant update on the company is in relation to the company’s first quarter results, and the results have been included in the report now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
			\|Anonymous 3
	\|-		\|-
	\|13		\|13
	\|Add to the report information about Tesla's quarterly earnings.		\|Add to the report information about Tesla's quarterly earnings.
			\|Anonymous 1
	\|Information about the earnings have been added now, so I think this issue has been fixed.		\|Information about the earnings have been added now, so I think this issue has been fixed.
			\|Anonymous 3
	\|-		\|-
	\|14		\| 14
	\|Change the format of the report to the following headings: summary, company background, strategy, recent trading, recent updates, etc.		\|Change the format of the report to the following headings: summary, company background, strategy, recent trading, recent updates, etc.
			\|Anonymous 1
	\|I think this issue has been fixed now.		\|I think this issue has been fixed now.
			\|Anonymous 3
	\|-		\|-
	\|15		\|15
	\|Change in the report the word "lifespan" to "time horizon".		\|Change in the report the word "lifespan" to "time horizon".
			\|Anonymous 1
	\|I think unless more people provide the same feedback, then it's best to keep the word how it is.		\|I think unless more people provide the same feedback, then it's best to keep the word how it is.
			\|Anonymous 3
	\|-		\|-
	\|16		\|16
	\|The time horizon of 60 years questionable.		\|The time horizon of 60 years questionable.
			\|Anonymous 1
	\|An explanation about the reason behind using 60 years is provided in the report. Without knowing why the person thinks 60 years is questionable, it's almost impossible to know whether the issue is fixed or not. That said, a later version of the Stockhub platform will enable users to amend the underlying assumptions of the financial model.		\|An explanation about the reason behind using 60 years is provided in the report. Without knowing why the person thinks 60 years is questionable, it's almost impossible to know whether the issue is fixed or not. That said, a later version of the Stockhub platform will enable users to amend the underlying assumptions of the financial model.
			\|Anonymous 3
	\|-		\|-
	\|17		\|17
	\|It was a good and comprehensive report. I found the detail of all the cars a bit long so I wonder if you can somehow shorten that part or maybe have it as an appendix. The overall company assessment and financials is the most relevant / interesting bit.		\|It was a good and comprehensive report. I found the detail of all the cars a bit long so I wonder if you can somehow shorten that part or maybe have it as an appendix. The overall company assessment and financials is the most relevant / interesting bit.
	\|		\|Anonymous 2
			\|Which cars details do you think is best to remove/move to the appendix?
			\|Anonymous 3
	\|}		\|}

Manos at 14:15, 20 June 2022

2022-06-20T14:15:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:15, 20 June 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable sortable"
	\|+		\|+
	!#		!#