Open main menu
Home
Random
Donate
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Stockhub
Disclaimers
Search
User menu
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Arctic Shores
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===What are the assumptions used to estimate the return?=== {| class="wikitable" |+ Key inputs !Description !Value !Commentary |- | Which valuation model do you want to use? |Discounted cash flow |Research suggests that in terms of estimating the expected return of an investment over a period of 12-months or more, the approach that is more accurate is the discounted cash flow approach<ref name=":5">Demirakos et al., 2010; Gleason et al., 2013</ref>, so that's the approach that he Stockhub users suggest to use here; nevertheless, for completeness purposes, separately, the valuation of the company is also estimated using the using the relative valuation approach (the valuation based on the relative approach can be found in the appendix of this report). Arctic Shores has never paid cash dividends, and on 7th February 2022, it said that it currently does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the Stockhub users suggest using the free cash flow valuation method (rather than the dividend discount model). |- |Which financial forecasts to use? | Stockhub |The only available long-term forecasts (i.e. >15 years) are the ones that are supplied by the Stockhub users (the forecasts can be found in the financials section of this report), so the Stockhub users suggest using those. |- | colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 1</div>''' |- |Discount rate (%) |30% |There are two key risk parameters for a firm that need to be estimated: its cost of equity and its cost of debt. A key way to estimate the cost of equity is by looking at the beta (or betas) of the company in question, the cost of debt from a measure of default risk (an actual or synthetic rating) and apply the market value weights for debt and equity to come up with the cost of capital. |- |Probability of success (%) |70% |Research suggests that a suitable rate for a company in this growth stage (i.e. stage 1) is 70%. |- | colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 2</div>''' |- |Discount rate (%) | 15% |There are two key risk parameters for a firm that need to be estimated: its cost of equity and its cost of debt. A key way to estimate the cost of equity is by looking at the beta (or betas) of the company in question, the cost of debt from a measure of default risk (an actual or synthetic rating) and apply the market value weights for debt and equity to come up with the cost of capital. |- |Probability of success (%) | 80% | Research suggests that a suitable rate for a company in this growth stage (i.e. stage 2) is 80%. |- | colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 3</div>''' |- |Discount rate (%) | 10% |There are two key risk parameters for a firm that need to be estimated: its cost of equity and its cost of debt. A key way to estimate the cost of equity is by looking at the beta (or betas) of the company in question, the cost of debt from a measure of default risk (an actual or synthetic rating) and apply the market value weights for debt and equity to come up with the cost of capital. |- |Probability of success (%) |100% |Research suggests that a suitable rate for a company in this growth stage (i.e. stage 3) is 100%. |- | colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 4</div>''' |- |Discount rate (%) | 10% |There are two key risk parameters for a firm that need to be estimated: its cost of equity and its cost of debt. A key way to estimate the cost of equity is by looking at the beta (or betas) of the company in question, the cost of debt from a measure of default risk (an actual or synthetic rating) and apply the market value weights for debt and equity to come up with the cost of capital. |- |Probability of success (%) | 100% |Research suggests that a suitable rate for a company in this growth stage (i.e. stage 4) is 100%. |- | colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Other key inputs</div>''' |- |What's the current value of the company? |Β£21.98 million |The Stockhub users calculate the valuation as of Β£21.98 million (for the calculation, see the 'Arctic Shores Series B valuation calculation' table in this report. However, according to Dealroom.co estimates, the firm valuation is between $30m and $46m ($38 million mean) as of January 2023.<ref name=":2">https://app.dealroom.co/companies/arctic_shores/</ref> The valuation is based on either of: the publicly disclosed value, or an estimate that is based on the last funding round amount, using similar rounds as benchmarks. |- |Which time period do you want to use to estimate the expected return? | Between now and five years time |Research suggests that following a market crash, the average amount of time it takes for the price of a stock market to return to its pre-crash level (i.e. the recovery period) is at least three years.<ref>https://www.newyorkfed.org/mediabrary/media/medialibrary/media/research/staff_reports/research_papers/9809.pdf</ref> Accordingly, Stockhub suggests that to account for general market cyclicity, it's best to estimate the expected return of the company between now and five years time. |- |Which valuation recommendation method do you want to use? |Relative |There's two main types of valuation recommendation methods, relative and absolute. The relative method determines the investment recommendation relative to other investments (e.g. the investment is "suitable" if it's within say the top 10% of the investment universe in terms of investment returns), whereas the absolute method determines the recommendation based on a fixed return amount (e.g. the investment is "suitable" if it returns 50% or more). Assuming sufficient data, the Stockhub users suggest using the relative method. |- |Which top proportion of the investment universe constitutes a "suitable" rating? |10% |The proportion depends on the user's preference. That said, typically, the higher the proportion, the higher the risk associated with the investment. |- |Which universe of investments do you want to use? |All investments |If the main objective of the user is to maximise investment returns, then the Stockhub users suggest using 'all investments' as the investment universe. |}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Stockhub may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Stockhub:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)