Open main menu
Home
Random
Donate
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Stockhub
Disclaimers
Search
User menu
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Arctic Shores
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Assessment scheme to adjust the basic beta coefficient of Arctic Shores=== Research suggests that the average beta coefficient for start-ups high-tech start-ups is 6.4. The general basic beta coefficient has to be adjusted for each individual start-up based on the risk profile. A standardised assessment scheme has been developed for the adjustment of the beta coefficient. The assessment scheme is used for the standardised determination of a premium or a discount to the beta coefficient depending on the risk profile, associated with the startup, based on information from the business plan and additional discussions with the founders or the management team. {| class="wikitable" |+Assessment scheme to adjust the basic beta coefficient of Arctic Shores<ref>https://ijb.cyut.edu.tw/var/file/10/1010/img/859/V183-3.pdf</ref> ! rowspan="2" |Category ! rowspan="2" |Subcategory ! colspan="5" |'''Adjustment of the beta coefficient''' ! rowspan="2" |'''Result''' |- !'''+1''' !'''+0.5''' !'''0''' !'''-0.5''' !'''-1''' |- ! rowspan="4" | Technology !Maturity of technology |Technology still in initial experimental phase |Technology successful on a laboratory scale |Technology successful in pilot plant |Technology successful in demo plant |Technology successful in technical application | '''-1.0''' |- !Advantages compared to competitive technologies |No advantages identified |Advantages not clearly identifiable |Costs or quality advantages identifiable |Costs and quality advantages identifiable |Significant costs and quality advantages identifiable | '''+1.0''' |- !Reputation of scientist |No reputation |Poor reputation |Moderate reputation |Good reputation |Very good reputation |'''+0.5''' |- !Patent protection |No patent application |First patent application filed |Basic patent close to being granted |Basic patent granted |Extensive portfolio of granted patents | '''+1.0''' |- ! rowspan="4" | Products !Product benefits |Product benefits not identifiable |Product benefits not clearly identifiable |Product benefits clearly identifiable |Product benefits confirmed by first clients |Product benefits confirmed by numerous clients | '''+1.0''' |- !Unique selling proposition |Unique selling proposition not identifiable |Unique selling proposition not clearly identifiable |Unique selling proposition clearly identifiable |Unique selling proposition confirmed by first clients |Unique selling proposition confirmed by numerous clients | '''+1.0''' |- !Scalability |Very low scalability |Low scalability |Moderate scalability |High scalability |Very high scalability |'''-1.0''' |- !Competition |Currently strong competition |Potentially strong competition |Moderate competition | Low competition |Long-term low competition | '''+1.0''' |- ! rowspan="4" | Implementation !Business plan |Business plan unjustifiable |Business plan with open questions |Business plan plausible |Business plan occasionally proven |Business plan frequently proven | '''0.0''' |- !Technical development plan |Technical development plan unjustifiable |Technical development plan difficult to justify |Technical development plan justifiable |Technical development plan likely to be feasible |Technical development plan very likely to be feasible | '''0.0''' |- !Marketing plan |Marketing plan unjustifiable |Marketing plan difficult to justify |Marketing plan justifiable |Marketing plan likely to be feasible |Marketing plan very likely to be feasible | '''0.0''' |- !Business development plan |Business development plan unjustifiable |Business development plan difficult to justify |Business development plan justifiable |Business development plan likely to be feasible |Business development plan very likely to be feasible | '''0.0''' |- ! rowspan="4" | Organisation' !Competences of the management team |Management team with major flaws |Management team with some flaws |Management team is complete |Management team is complete and competent | rowspan="2" |Management team is complete and very competent Headquarters location has many advantages | '''0.0''' |- !Headquarters location |Headquarters location problematic |Headquarters location can be improved |Headquarters location is fine |Headquarters location has advantages | '''-0.5''' |- !Competences of advisory board |Very low level of competences of advisory board/ consultants |Low level of competences of advisory board/ consultants |Moderate level of competences of advisory board/consultants |High level of competences of advisory board/ consultants |Very high level of competences of advisory board/consultants | '''-0.5''' |- !Process efficiency |Process inefficient |Process not very efficient |Process efficient |Process very efficient |Process exceptionally efficient | '''0.0''' |- ! rowspan="4" | Finances !Sales plan |Sales plan unjustifiable |Sales plan difficult to justify |Sales plan justifiable |Sales plan conservative |Sales plan very conservative | '''0.0''' |- !Costs plan |Costs plan unjustifiable |Costs plan difficult to justify |Costs plan justifiable |Costs plan conservative |Costs plan very conservative | '''0.0''' |- !Profitability |Fundamentally low profitability |Risk of low profitability |Average profitability |Currently high profitability |Fundamentally high profitability | '''1.0''' |- !Liquidity plan |Financial resources for next year are not secured |Financial resources for next year are secured |Financial resources for next 2 years are secured |Financial resources for next 3 years are secured |Financial resources for next 4 years are secured | '''0.0''' |- | colspan="7" |'''Total''' |'''3.5''' |}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Stockhub may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Stockhub:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)