Editing Babylon Holdings Limited

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 154: Line 154:


Another risk Babylon faces is with the efficacy of their platform. With limited AI funding and some reviews questioning the impact and value of their service Babylon can come under scrutiny if proven to be ineffective. To mitigate this, funding is needed to constantly evolve and improve their software and fix any outstanding errors. A risk related to this is whether Babylon's service is creating value to the correct target groups. Some criticism form NHS practitioners has suggested Babylon's model using new technology may attract the wrong customer base. Some have said their service may be counter productive since younger healthier individuals are using the app and gaining NHS referrals when they are mostly healthy. This is wasting valuable NHS time an resourcing through directing care away from those who may be older and need this service more prominently, to those who would not have otherwise used NHS services for a smaller illness as Babylon's platform makes this easier to do so.
Another risk Babylon faces is with the efficacy of their platform. With limited AI funding and some reviews questioning the impact and value of their service Babylon can come under scrutiny if proven to be ineffective. To mitigate this, funding is needed to constantly evolve and improve their software and fix any outstanding errors. A risk related to this is whether Babylon's service is creating value to the correct target groups. Some criticism form NHS practitioners has suggested Babylon's model using new technology may attract the wrong customer base. Some have said their service may be counter productive since younger healthier individuals are using the app and gaining NHS referrals when they are mostly healthy. This is wasting valuable NHS time an resourcing through directing care away from those who may be older and need this service more prominently, to those who would not have otherwise used NHS services for a smaller illness as Babylon's platform makes this easier to do so.
'''Risk summary'''
* Operations are dependent on physician owned entities so a damage to those relationships will drastically effect Babylon’s operational ability
* Significant portion of Babylon’s revenue is coming from a small number of customers. This leaves Babylon very dependant and therefore vulnerable to this group. If opinions change, a huge revenue source will be lost immediately.
* Babylon’s move to go private without paying shareholders could negatively impact sentiment towards the firm. This could result in long term damage to the company’s reputation which could negatively affect its growth prospects.
* Babylon’s move to go private is in place to restructure the business which is currently accumulating losses. If the company restructuring fails to have the desired effect, Babylon could continue to be unprofitable until eventually, available funding dries up.
* The healthcare industry is a heavily regulated industry, with many licenses and authorisations required for participation. If any of these are lost, Babylon’s may lose the right to operate some its services, ending revenue streams and preventing Babylon from being able to grow in the market.


== ESG ==
== ESG ==
Please note that all contributions to Stockhub may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Stockhub:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)