Editing LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1,278: Line 1,278:
For the DCF model, the weighted average between the bull case, base case, and bear case obtained $1142.65 share price which has a 31.29% upside.
For the DCF model, the weighted average between the bull case, base case, and bear case obtained $1142.65 share price which has a 31.29% upside.


A simple 50% base case, 25% bull case, and bear case are used because of the uncertainty of the decision of the FOMC on the terminal interest rate. The new reported number on the CPI, consumer price index, has back down to 3% whereas the previous number is 4%. If the FOMC, federal open market committee, does not decrease the interest rate in around September or November, the market will likely be looking at deflation instead. Although the non-Farm payroll has a strong number and a low unemployment rate, the participation rate is much lower than the average, which indicates that the unemployment is not accurately reflected. According to the backtesting research, whenever the FOMC decreases the interest rate, the transition from hawkish to dovish sentiment, resulting in a short squeeze of the stock market and then a big fall, the target is likely to be reached in the next few months when the interest rate is not likely to be increased. A dovish sentiment is an interest rate policy that is more accommodative to stimulate spending in an economy, which is clearly good for the luxury good market.
A simple 50% base case, 25% bull case, and bear case are used because of the uncertainty of the decision of the FOMC on the terminal interest rate. The new reported number on the CPI has back down to 3% whereas the previous number is 4%. If the FOMC does not decrease the interest rate in around September or November, the market will likely be looking at deflation instead. Although the non-Farm payroll has a strong number and a low unemployment rate, the participation rate is much lower than the average, which indicates that the unemployment is not accurately reflected. According to the backtesting research, whenever the FOMC decreases the interest rate, the transition from hawkish to dovish sentiment, resulting in a short squeeze of the stock market and then a big fall, the target is likely to be reached in the next few months when the interest rate is not likely to be increased. Also, for the growth rate, the function of (Estimated revenue in the last year which is 2027 divided by Actual revenue in 2018 which is the first)^(1/10) - 1 is used. The risk-free rate takes the US 10-year treasury bond yield rate. The Beta value takes the 5 Year monthly, which has a value of 1.03 which suggests that LVMH moves with more momentum than the S&P 500 stocks. This beta suggests that it’s not a very risky investment as it doesn’t deviate a lot from the market beta of 1. Although theoretically it does increase a portfolios risk by 3% and may increase the expected return.


Also, for the growth rate, the function of (Estimated revenue in the last year which is 2027 divided by Actual revenue in 2018 which is the first)^(1/10) - 1 is used. Whereas all growth is constant in the next 5 years with a constant revenue growth of approximately 16.2%, taken from the average of the revenue growth during the last 4 years. This method was also used to calculate the % change in COGS, Operating expenses, Selling, General and administrative and tax% of EBIT. Resulting in the financial forecast of LVMH of the next 5 financial years.


The risk-free rate takes the US 10-year treasury bond yield rate. The Beta value takes the 5 Year monthly, which has a value of 1.03 which suggests that LVMH moves with more momentum than the S&P 500 stocks. This beta suggests that it’s not a very risky investment as it doesn’t deviate a lot from the market beta of 1. Although theoretically it does increase a portfolios risk by 3% and may increase the expected return.


Looking at the numbers in the DCF model, for the base case, we assumed a constant percentage increase. The China PPI (producer price index ) number is lower than expected, falling by 5.4 percent in June from the previous year, marking the steepest fall since December 2015. Despite the issue remaining from 2022, the revenue and profit numbers remain strong in the Chinese Market in LVMH. When this situation is relieved, the buying power is likely to be released and the consumer discretionary industry is more likely to be getting the attention. The number is likely to be higher than the prediction from using the constant percentage increase.
Looking at the numbers in the DCF model, for the base case, we assumed a constant percentage increase. The China PPI (producer price index ) number is lower than expected, falling by 5.4 percent in June from the previous year, marking the steepest fall since December 2015. Despite the issue remaining from 2022, the revenue and profit numbers remain strong in the Chinese Market in LVMH. When this situation is relieved, the buying power is likely to be released and the consumer discretionary industry is more likely to be getting the attention. The number is likely to be higher than the prediction from using the constant percentage increase.
Line 1,290: Line 1,288:
For the Bull case, LVMH and Google announced a strategic partnership to accelerate innovation and develop new cloud-based artificial intelligence (AI) solutions in 2021. This creates new, personalized customer experiences that foster long-term growth. LVMH will be able to take actions to improve the overall business efficiency, from customer experience personalization to product development and logistics, on top of the current machine learning trend. Therefore, the earning number increased by 23%, taking the change from 2021 to 2022.
For the Bull case, LVMH and Google announced a strategic partnership to accelerate innovation and develop new cloud-based artificial intelligence (AI) solutions in 2021. This creates new, personalized customer experiences that foster long-term growth. LVMH will be able to take actions to improve the overall business efficiency, from customer experience personalization to product development and logistics, on top of the current machine learning trend. Therefore, the earning number increased by 23%, taking the change from 2021 to 2022.


The bull case and bear case are calculated with the earnings in EV/EBITDA and Net Debt/EBITDA, and the Free Cash Flow Equity Yield based on their free cash flow, both earning price target and the FCFE price target are weighted 50% each. Throughout the calculation, we obtained the WACC of 13.33% and the CAPM, capital asset pricing model, is 14.08%, and the difference between ROIC%, return on invested capital, and WACC% is 5%. Furthermore, the CapEx has decreased by 10% every year since 2018, indicating that the company is investing its money in future growth. Suggested as well by a decreasing EBITDA but increasing gross profit. Due to the uncertainty of the predicted value of the CPI, we believed that the actual upside of the share price would be higher, because of the effect of lowering the interest rate for the first time in the third bull phase according to Dow's theory and the transition from hawkish sentiment to dovish sentiment.
The bull case and bear case are calculated with the earnings in EV/EBITDA and Net Debt/EBITDA, and the Free Cash Flow Equity Yield based on their free cash flow, both earning price target and the FCFE price target are weighted 50% each. Throughout the calculation, we obtained the WACC of 13.33% and the CAPM is 14.08%, and the difference between ROIC% and WACC% is 5%. Furthermore, the CapEx has decreased by 10% every year since 2018, indicating that the company is investing its money in future growth. Due to the uncertainty of the predicted value of the CPI, we believed that the actual upside of the share price would be higher, because of the effect of lowering the interest rate for the first time in the third bull phase according to Dow's theory and the transition from hawkish sentiment to dovish sentiment.


For the relative valuation, firstly, its Piotroski F-Score (discrete score between zero and nine used to determine the strength of a firm's financial position) where LVMH has scored a 9. Altman Z-Score (measures the likelihood of a publicly traded company going bankrupt - a value close to 0 suggests a company might be going bankrupt and a value close to 3 suggests a company is in a solid financial position) where LVMH has scored a value of 4.59. The Beneish M-Score indicates that LVMH is not a manipulator on their financial reports.  
For the relative valuation, firstly, its Piotroski F-Score (discrete score between zero and nine used to determine the strength of a firm's financial position) where LVMH has scored a 9. Altman Z-Score (measures the likelihood of a publicly traded company going bankrupt - a value close to 0 suggests a company might be going bankrupt and a value close to 3 suggests a company is in a solid financial position) where LVMH has scored a value of 4.59. The Beneish M-Score indicates that LVMH is not a manipulator on their financial reports. Secondly, The PE ratio is currently at 30.5, which is just above the median of its history of 24.71, the minimum value of 11.39, and the maximum value of 78.7. Although the PE ratio is ranked worse than 74.97% across the whole retail-cylindrical industry, LVMH has a huge increase in Revenue, EPS, and operating cash flow, indicating that LVMH remains undervalued if this trend continues. This prediction could be seen by looking at the PEG value, which has a value of 1.5. The median value in its history is 2.28, which is way lower than the maximum value of 5.65 in its history. Thirdly, the EV-to-EBITDA is currently at 16.89, which has a similar value to the medium of 12.85. Although it has a higher value than 10, it is significantly lower than its competitors in the industry, where Hermes International SA, St Dupont SA, and Maison Clio Blue SA have the EV-to-EBITDA of 35.02, 124.72, 395.23, this indicating that LVMH is undervalued compared to the industry. The PS ratio is currently at 5.42, it is near to the medium for the past 10 years of 3.05, and has a similar number comparing to the industry, which is 4.5. This indicating that the LVMH stock is slightly undervalued comparing to its industry.
 
Secondly, The PE ratio is currently at 30.5, which is just above the median of its history of 24.71, the minimum value of 11.39, and the maximum value of 78.7. Although the PE ratio is ranked worse than 74.97% across the whole retail-cylindrical industry, LVMH has a huge increase in Revenue, EPS, and operating cash flow, indicating that LVMH remains undervalued if this trend continues.  
 
This prediction could be seen by looking at the PEG (Price/ Earnings-to-Growth) value, which has a value of 1.5. The median value in its history is 2.28, which is way lower than the maximum value of 5.65 in its history.  
 
Thirdly, the EV-to-EBITDA is currently at 16.89, which has a similar value to the medium of 12.85. Although it has a higher value than 10, it is significantly lower than its competitors in the industry, where Hermes International SA, St Dupont SA, and Maison Clio Blue SA have the EV-to-EBITDA of 35.02, 124.72, 395.23, this indicating that LVMH is undervalued compared to the industry.  
 
The PS ratio is currently at 5.42, it is near to the medium for the past 10 years of 3.05, and has a similar number comparing to the industry, which is 4.5. This indicating that the LVMH stock is slightly undervalued comparing to its industry.


In summary, both the results from the DCF model and the relative valuation method indicate that LVMH is undervalued, compared to itself in history, the industry, and the potential growth using its free cash flow. LVMH has a potential upside of 31.09% upside.
In summary, both the results from the DCF model and the relative valuation method indicate that LVMH is undervalued, compared to itself in history, the industry, and the potential growth using its free cash flow. LVMH has a potential upside of 31.09% upside.
Please note that all contributions to Stockhub may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Stockhub:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)