Editing MusicMagpie

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 182: Line 182:
'''Exhibit 3: Revenue profile<ref name=":0">Source: musicMagpie.</ref>'''
'''Exhibit 3: Revenue profile<ref name=":0">Source: musicMagpie.</ref>'''


[[File:Image3-864b662bcea7baa595b4eb1433877689.png|600x600px]]
[[File:Image3-864b662bcea7baa595b4eb1433877689.png|600x600px]]'''Exhibit 4: Gross profit<ref name=":0" />'''[[File:Image4-daa9a6af2329ac239370761285d3679b.png|600x600px]]
 
'''Exhibit 4: Gross profit<ref name=":0" />'''
 
[[File:Image4-daa9a6af2329ac239370761285d3679b.png|600x600px]]


Since being introduced to the offer, Technology has become the largest source of revenue. At £86m in FY21 it represented c 59% of the group total, while Media and Books represented 35% and 6%, respectively. The average gross margin has improved, from 23.2% in FY18 to 30.4% in FY21, due to higher margins for all categories (except for Books in FY21) offset by mix changes. With respect to mix changes, the increasing importance of Technology (lower average percentage margin but higher cash profit) and Books (higher average percentage margin) have been positive for the overall gross profit and/or margin, offset in part by the declining importance of Media (higher average percentage margin).
Since being introduced to the offer, Technology has become the largest source of revenue. At £86m in FY21 it represented c 59% of the group total, while Media and Books represented 35% and 6%, respectively. The average gross margin has improved, from 23.2% in FY18 to 30.4% in FY21, due to higher margins for all categories (except for Books in FY21) offset by mix changes. With respect to mix changes, the increasing importance of Technology (lower average percentage margin but higher cash profit) and Books (higher average percentage margin) have been positive for the overall gross profit and/or margin, offset in part by the declining importance of Media (higher average percentage margin).
Line 193: Line 189:
MMAG’s core consumer circular business model can be broken down into four constituent parts: buy, receive, refurbish and sell/rent.
MMAG’s core consumer circular business model can be broken down into four constituent parts: buy, receive, refurbish and sell/rent.


'''Exhibit 5: musicMagpie’s circular business model<ref>Source: musicMagpie.</ref>'''
'''Exhibit 5: musicMagpie’s circular business model<ref>Source: musicMagpie.</ref>'''[[File:Image5-2a26213dc893059206714d5e57034217.png|600x600px]]
 
[[File:Image5-2a26213dc893059206714d5e57034217.png|600x600px]]


=== Buy ===
=== Buy ===
Line 271: Line 265:
Historically, there has been limited cross-sell between the customers that buy and sell using MMAG, and between the different product categories, due to a lack of visibility between the different channels and categories. Exhibit 6 shows the percentage of customers buying and selling across the product categories and the overlap between them, from July 2018 to 2020. At the category level there was very limited overlap between customers that both buy and sell: 1.2% of customers that sold technology through MMAG also bought technology and just 4.1% (those highlighted in the green box below) of customers have bought and sold technology or media at least once. In aggregate, 51% of customers who sold any category through MMAG did not buy anything MMAG during the sampled time period and 45% of customers that bought did not sell a product.
Historically, there has been limited cross-sell between the customers that buy and sell using MMAG, and between the different product categories, due to a lack of visibility between the different channels and categories. Exhibit 6 shows the percentage of customers buying and selling across the product categories and the overlap between them, from July 2018 to 2020. At the category level there was very limited overlap between customers that both buy and sell: 1.2% of customers that sold technology through MMAG also bought technology and just 4.1% (those highlighted in the green box below) of customers have bought and sold technology or media at least once. In aggregate, 51% of customers who sold any category through MMAG did not buy anything MMAG during the sampled time period and 45% of customers that bought did not sell a product.


'''<br />Exhibit 6: Cross-sell between buy and sell, and technology and media in UK<ref>Source: musicMagpie. Note: Sample July 2018 to July 2020.</ref>'''
'''<br />Exhibit 6: Cross-sell between buy and sell, and technology and media in UK<ref>Source: musicMagpie. Note: Sample July 2018 to July 2020.</ref>'''[[File:Cross-sell between buy and sell, and technology and media in UK.jpg|600x600px]]
 
[[File:Cross-sell between buy and sell, and technology and media in UK.jpg|600x600px]]


Therefore, management believes there are significant cross-selling opportunities, while recognising that a high proportion of customers are likely to be interested in only buying or selling. As a result, MMAG has invested in technology to better exploit its knowledge of its customer base and their transaction history. In December 2020, MMAG began using Exponea, a customer data and experience platform that unifies data to create a single view of each customer’s activity. The platform then uses artificial intelligence to provide predictions and personalised product recommendations to customers to stimulate incremental demand through targeted marketing such as email campaigns and text messages. Management believes this is a significant improvement from its previous marketing, which was a standard email to all customers without any personalisation of the promotions.
Therefore, management believes there are significant cross-selling opportunities, while recognising that a high proportion of customers are likely to be interested in only buying or selling. As a result, MMAG has invested in technology to better exploit its knowledge of its customer base and their transaction history. In December 2020, MMAG began using Exponea, a customer data and experience platform that unifies data to create a single view of each customer’s activity. The platform then uses artificial intelligence to provide predictions and personalised product recommendations to customers to stimulate incremental demand through targeted marketing such as email campaigns and text messages. Management believes this is a significant improvement from its previous marketing, which was a standard email to all customers without any personalisation of the promotions.
Line 299: Line 291:
'''Exhibit 8: Relative contributions of sale versus rental<ref name=":1" />'''
'''Exhibit 8: Relative contributions of sale versus rental<ref name=":1" />'''


[[File:Relative contributions of sale versus rental.png]]
[[File:Relative contributions of sale versus rental.png]]An outright sale of a smartphone in the example given generates revenue of £290, trading profit of £90 (margin 31%), gross profit of £78 (margin c 27%), EBITDA of £59 (margin c 20%) and EBITA of £59 (margin 20%). In this example, over the (estimated) three-year life, management estimates a subscription should generate significantly higher revenue and profitability than an outright sale: revenue of £480, trading profit £480 (margin 100% with no cost of sale, the smartphone is capitalised as an asset and depreciated over the estimated useful life of the device), gross profit of £364 (margin c 76%), EBITDA of £335 (margin c 70%) and EBITA of £213 (margin 44.3%). The near-term dampening effect on year-one revenue is highlighted by a comparison of the revenue recognised of the rental of £200 versus an outright sale of £290. However, offsetting this, management estimates the EBITA of a subscription is higher than an outright sale after nine months.
 
An outright sale of a smartphone in the example given generates revenue of £290, trading profit of £90 (margin 31%), gross profit of £78 (margin c 27%), EBITDA of £59 (margin c 20%) and EBITA of £59 (margin 20%). In this example, over the (estimated) three-year life, management estimates a subscription should generate significantly higher revenue and profitability than an outright sale: revenue of £480, trading profit £480 (margin 100% with no cost of sale, the smartphone is capitalised as an asset and depreciated over the estimated useful life of the device), gross profit of £364 (margin c 76%), EBITDA of £335 (margin c 70%) and EBITA of £213 (margin 44.3%). The near-term dampening effect on year-one revenue is highlighted by a comparison of the revenue recognised of the rental of £200 versus an outright sale of £290. However, offsetting this, management estimates the EBITA of a subscription is higher than an outright sale after nine months.


MMAG’s FY21 results included full disclosure for revenue and profitability of outright sales (i.e. one-off) and rental income, and the total for the whole of Technology.
MMAG’s FY21 results included full disclosure for revenue and profitability of outright sales (i.e. one-off) and rental income, and the total for the whole of Technology.
Line 472: Line 462:
Management expects the UK and US markets for pre-owned books to be relatively flat over the medium term, despite competing digital formats and the increasing attractions of alternate media and entertainment. This expectation is supported by historical data.
Management expects the UK and US markets for pre-owned books to be relatively flat over the medium term, despite competing digital formats and the increasing attractions of alternate media and entertainment. This expectation is supported by historical data.


'''Exhibit 11: UK book sales<ref>Source: Statista.</ref>'''
'''Exhibit 11: UK book sales<ref>Source: Statista.</ref>'''[[File:UK book sales.png|600x600px]]From 2009–19, the UK book market grew at a CAGR of c 2% (from £3.2bn to £3.7bn), within which physical book revenue was broadly stable and digital has provided all of the absolute growth. MMAG has consistently outperformed wider market growth in recent years, helped more recently by the COVID-19 pandemic, as was the case for disc media. Following revenue growth of c 11% in FY19, the COVID-19 pandemic helped to boost MMAG’s Books revenue by c 74% in FY20 and a further c 10% in H121. As expected by management, the revenue run-rate returned to more normalised, that is pre-COVID-19, levels in H222, declining by c 43% to £3.6m, taking the year-on-year decline for FY21 to c 21%.
 
[[File:UK book sales.png|600x600px]]
 
From 2009–19, the UK book market grew at a CAGR of c 2% (from £3.2bn to £3.7bn), within which physical book revenue was broadly stable and digital has provided all of the absolute growth. MMAG has consistently outperformed wider market growth in recent years, helped more recently by the COVID-19 pandemic, as was the case for disc media. Following revenue growth of c 11% in FY19, the COVID-19 pandemic helped to boost MMAG’s Books revenue by c 74% in FY20 and a further c 10% in H121. As expected by management, the revenue run-rate returned to more normalised, that is pre-COVID-19, levels in H222, declining by c 43% to £3.6m, taking the year-on-year decline for FY21 to c 21%.


=== Competitors ===
=== Competitors ===
Please note that all contributions to Stockhub may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Stockhub:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)