Stockhub

Talk:Tesla, Inc.: Difference between revisions

Page Discussion
(Created page with "Feedback from an anonymous user on the report: * The report contains repeated information, such Elon Musk's bio, the place(s) that the offerings are promoted and marketed. * The description of the target audience seems inaccurate. * The report is wordy. * The report is too dumb-downed. For example, no need to describe what a car is. * A suggestion is to remove the sub-headings. Which ones? * One of the table includes one or more silly categories. For example, "is the ca...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Feedback from an anonymous user on the report:
Feedback from an anonymous user on the report:


* The report contains repeated information, such Elon Musk's bio, the place(s) that the offerings are promoted and marketed.
# The report contains repeated information, such Elon Musk's bio, the place(s) that the offerings are promoted and marketed.
* The description of the target audience seems inaccurate.
## I think this has been fixed now.
* The report is wordy.
# The description of the target audience seems inaccurate.
* The report is too dumb-downed. For example, no need to describe what a car is.
## I think this has been fixed now.
* A suggestion is to remove the sub-headings. Which ones?
# The report is wordy.
* One of the table includes one or more silly categories. For example, "is the car safe?"
# The report is too dumb-downed. For example, no need to describe what a car is.
* The report is different to other reports.
## I think this has been fixed now.
* Check that the minimum investment amount is indeed £10.  
# A suggestion is to remove the sub-headings.
* The valuation of the investment is unclear and complex; make it clearer and simpler. See a high-quality research report for an example.
## I think this has been fixed now.
* The report seems robotic.
# One of the table includes one or more silly categories. For example, "is the car safe?"
* I'd rate the quality of the report 2 out of 10.
## I think this has been fixed now.
* Add to the report recent news.
# The report is different to other reports.
* Add to the report information about Tesla's quarterly earnings.
# Check that the minimum investment amount is indeed £10.  
* Change the format of the report to the following headings: summary, company background, strategy, recent trading, recent updates, etc.
## I think this has been fixed now.
* Change in the report the word "lifespan" to "time horizon". The time horizon of 60 years questionable.
# The valuation of the investment is unclear and complex; make it clearer and simpler. See a high-quality research report for an example.
# The report seems robotic.
## I think this has been fixed now.
# I'd rate the quality of the report 2 out of 10.
# Add to the report recent news.
# Add to the report information about Tesla's quarterly earnings.
# Change the format of the report to the following headings: summary, company background, strategy, recent trading, recent updates, etc.
# Change in the report the word "lifespan" to "time horizon". The time horizon of 60 years questionable.

Revision as of 11:52, 3 June 2022

Feedback from an anonymous user on the report:

  1. The report contains repeated information, such Elon Musk's bio, the place(s) that the offerings are promoted and marketed.
    1. I think this has been fixed now.
  2. The description of the target audience seems inaccurate.
    1. I think this has been fixed now.
  3. The report is wordy.
  4. The report is too dumb-downed. For example, no need to describe what a car is.
    1. I think this has been fixed now.
  5. A suggestion is to remove the sub-headings.
    1. I think this has been fixed now.
  6. One of the table includes one or more silly categories. For example, "is the car safe?"
    1. I think this has been fixed now.
  7. The report is different to other reports.
  8. Check that the minimum investment amount is indeed £10.
    1. I think this has been fixed now.
  9. The valuation of the investment is unclear and complex; make it clearer and simpler. See a high-quality research report for an example.
  10. The report seems robotic.
    1. I think this has been fixed now.
  11. I'd rate the quality of the report 2 out of 10.
  12. Add to the report recent news.
  13. Add to the report information about Tesla's quarterly earnings.
  14. Change the format of the report to the following headings: summary, company background, strategy, recent trading, recent updates, etc.
  15. Change in the report the word "lifespan" to "time horizon". The time horizon of 60 years questionable.
Retrieved from ‘https://stockhub.co/index.php?title=Talk:Tesla,_Inc.&oldid=2741’