Editing Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 202: Line 202:
From the revenue profile of market segments, it can be seen that ingredients supply are driving most of the revenue of Fonterra. In the 2030 prospect, Fonterra does claim plan to expand its foodservices channels in existing key markets in Asia Pacific. In Asia pacific regions, particularly Indonesia and Malaysia where general income is increasing and dairy products been viewed as premium products, Fonterra aims to double its efforts to expand these foodservice channels (such as local bakeries) to meet growing demands.
From the revenue profile of market segments, it can be seen that ingredients supply are driving most of the revenue of Fonterra. In the 2030 prospect, Fonterra does claim plan to expand its foodservices channels in existing key markets in Asia Pacific. In Asia pacific regions, particularly Indonesia and Malaysia where general income is increasing and dairy products been viewed as premium products, Fonterra aims to double its efforts to expand these foodservice channels (such as local bakeries) to meet growing demands.


== Financials ==
== Financial ==
Discounted cash flow (DCF) modelling was used to value Fonterra.


=== '''Key financial ratios''' <ref>https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/NZ/XNZE/FCG/financials</ref> ===
'''1) Efficiency ratios'''
{| class="wikitable"
|Revenue/Employee
|4,460,358
|-
|Income Per Employee
|121,648
|-
|Receivables Turnover
|10.79
|-
|Total Asset Turnover
|1.27
|}
'''2) Liquidity ratios'''
{| class="wikitable"
|Current Ratio
|1.34
|-
|Quick Ratio
|0.57
|-
|Cash Ratio
|0.04
|}
'''3) Profitability ratios'''
{| class="wikitable"
|Gross Margin
|14.01
|-
|Operating Margin
|5.86
|-
|Pretax Margin
|3.57
|-
|Net Margin
|2.73
|-
|Return on Assets
|3.47
|-
|Return on Equity
|9.08
|-
|Return on Total Capital
|11.15
|-
|Return on Invested Capital
|5.46
|}
'''4) Capital Structure ratios'''
{| class="wikitable"
|Total Debt to Total Equity
|76.26
|-
|Total Debt to Total Capital
|43.27
|-
|Total Debt to Total Assets
|28.15
|-
|Interest Coverage
|5.12
|-
|Long-Term Debt to Equity
|70.68
|-
|Long-Term Debt to Total Capital
|40.1
|-
|Long-Term Debt to Assets
|0.26
|}
== Valuations ==
=== DCF ===
=== DCF ===


Line 643: Line 567:
==== WACC ====
==== WACC ====
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="2" |'''WACC'''
| colspan="2" rowspan="2" |'''WACC'''
|'''Reasons'''
|'''Reasons'''
|-
|-
|-
|Risk free rate
|Risk free rate
Line 687: Line 612:
|-
|-
| 
| 
|
|
|
|-
|-
Line 1,006: Line 930:
|1.158
|1.158
|}
|}
==== Valuation ====
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|Sum FCF
|Sum FCF
|5.585
|5.585
|
|-
|-
|Terminal growth rate
|Terminal growth rate
|4%
|0%
|Average perpetuity growth rate<ref>https://finbox.com/NZSE:FCG/models/ddm-sg/</ref>
|-
|-
|Terminal value
|Terminal value
|17.070
|11.005
|
|-
|-
|Enterprise value
|Enterprise value
|22.655
|16.590
|
|-
|-
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,029: Line 950:
|Net debt
|Net debt
|4.931
|4.931
|
|-
|-
|Equity value
|Equity value
|17.724
|11.659
|
|-
|-
|Shares
|Shares
|1.61
|1.61
|
|-
|-
|'''Fair share price in NZD'''
|'''Fair share price in NZD'''
|11.01
|7.24
|
|-
|-
|'''Current share price in NZD'''
|'''Current share price in NZD'''
|3.12
|3.12
|
|}
=== '''Relative Valuation''' ===
Trading comparable analysis was used to compare Fonterra to its competitors in the market. A range of different multiples are used to evaluate the current share price of Fonterra.<ref>https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nzx/fcg/relative-valuation</ref>
{| class="wikitable"
!
!P/S
!P/E
!EV/EBITDA
!EV/EBIT
!Earnings Growth
!EBITDA Growth
!PEG
!Growth Adjusted EV/EBITDA
|-
|'''Fonterra'''
|'''0.2'''
|'''6.6'''
|'''4.3'''
|'''6.5'''
|'''69.1%'''
|'''6.2%'''
|'''9.6'''
|'''69.2'''
|-
|Nestle SA
|3
|31
|16.7
|20.5
| -
| -
| -
| -
|-
|Mondelez International
|3
|25.1
|22.4
|28.6
|66.0%
|21.0%
|38.0
|106.7
|-
|Hershey
|4.5
|28.2
|18.8
|21.9
|87.0%
|58.0%
|32.4
|32.4
|-
|Kraft Heinz
|1.7
|18.3
|11.2
|13.4
|36.0%
|31.0%
|50.8
|36.1
|-
|General Mills
|2.2
|17
|14.9
|17.5
|59.0%
|23.0%
|28.8
|64.8
|-
|Danone SA
|1.3
|38
|8.2
|12.7
|19.0%
|29.0%
|200.0
|28.3
|-
|Foshan Haitan Flavourings and Food
|9.9
|41.1
|35.8
|35.8
|174.0%
|0.0%
|23.6
| -
|-
|Muyuan Foods
|1.8
|13.5
|12.3
|12.3
|82.0%
|65.0%
|16.5
|18.9
|-
|Yihai Kerry Arawana Holdings
|0.9
|59.7
|79.9
|79.9
|107.0%
|83.0%
|55.8
|96.3
|-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|'''Median'''
|'''2.2'''
|'''28.2'''
|'''16.7'''
|'''20.5'''
|'''70.0%'''
|'''111.0%'''
|'''2.1'''
|'''3.1'''
|-
|Mean
|3.1
|30.2
|24.5
|27.0
|78.8%
|38.8%
|55.7
|54.8
|-
|Lower Quartile
|1.7
|18.3
|12.3
|13.4
|53.3%
|22.5%
|27.5
|30.3
|-
|Upper Quartile
|3.0
|38.0
|22.4
|28.6
|92.0%
|59.8%
|52.1
|80.5
|-
|Min
|0.2
|6.6
|4.3
|6.5
|19.0%
|0.0%
|9.6
|18.9
|-
|Max
|9.9
|59.7
|79.9
|79.9
|174.0%
|83.0%
|200.0
|106.7
|}
|}
The valuation multiples are expressed in the bar charts with the industry median and the respective valuation multiple value for Fonterra.  
'''EV/EBIT'''
[[File:29-01.png|none|thumb|1120x1120px]]
EV/EBIT – The ratio evaluated the enterprise value of the company (considering all debts and liabilities) with respect to the operating earnings of the company. The average EV/EBITDA ratio in the industry is 20.5 while the EV/EBITDA ratio of Fonterra is 6.5. A low EV/EBITDA ratio suggests an undervaluation.   
'''P/S'''
[[File:29-02.png|none|thumb|1223x1223px]]
<big>P/S – Price to Sales ratio evaluates how much an investor values each dollar of sale generated by the company. The average P/S ratio in the industry is 2.2 while the P/S ratio of Fonterra is 0.2. A low P/S ratio suggests that the investors are willing to pay a lower price per dollar of sale generated implying an undervaluation.</big>
'''EV/EBITDA'''
[[File:29-03.png|none|thumb|1127x1127px]]
EV/EBITDA – The ratio evaluates the enterprise value of the company (considering all debts and liabilities) with respect to the operating performance of the company. The average EV/EBITDA ratio in the industry is 16.7 while the EV/EBITDA ratio of Fonterra is 4.3. A low EV/EBITDA ratio suggests an undervaluation.   
'''P/E'''
[[File:29-04.png|none|thumb|1067x1067px]]
P/E – Price to Earnings ratio shows how much an investor is willing to pay per dollar of earnings generated. It portrays an investor’s expectation of the future earnings of the company. The average P/E ratio in the industry is 28.2 while the P/S ratio of Fonterra is 6.6. A low P/E ratio suggests that the investors are willing to pay a lower price per dollar of EPS generated implying an undervaluation.
'''PEG'''
[[File:29-05.png|none|thumb|1191x1191px]]
PEG is the ratio of P/E to earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio greater than 1 indicates that the stock is overvalued while a PEG ratio smaller than 1 indicates the stock is undervalued. As a result of high earnings forecasts for Fonterra, the PEG ratio for Fonterra (9.6) is noticeably higher than the industry median (2.1).
'''Growth Adjusted EV/EBITDA'''
[[File:29-06.png|none|thumb|1173x1173px]]
The growth adjusted EV/EBITDA is the ratio of EV/EBITDA to the growth in EBITDA. The growth adjusted EV/EBITDA for Fonterra (69.2) is significantly higher than the industry median (3.1).


== Risk Assessment ==
== Risk Assessment ==


=== Dairy Industry Restructuring Act (DIRA) ===
=== Dairy Industry Restructing Act (DIRA) ===
The initial implementation of DIRA in 2001 lifted controls on exporting NZ dairy, effectively opening up competition of NZ dairy internationally. However, the near monopsony state of Fonterra Co-op with farmers decrease competition domestically. DIRA sets out requirements, specifically section 4(f) of the Act specifically states to regulate Fonterra to push overall contestability and efficiency of NZ dairy<ref name=":1" />.  
The initial implementation of DIRA in 2001 lifted controls on exporting NZ dairy, effectively opening up competition of NZ dairy internationally. However, the near monopsony state of Fonterra Co-op with farmers decrease competition domestically. DIRA sets out requirements, specifically section 4(f) of the Act specifically states to regulate Fonterra to push overall contestability and efficiency of NZ dairy<ref name=":1" />.  


Please note that all contributions to Stockhub may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Stockhub:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)