Editing Gazelle Wind Power
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Summary== | ==Summary== | ||
Line 10: | Line 8: | ||
==Idea== | ==Idea== | ||
<vimeo> | <html> | ||
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/688952635?h=76e8be42bd" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe> | |||
</html> | |||
'''Introduction''' | '''Introduction''' | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Gazelle Wind Power plans to license the technology to energy Project Developers, EPCs, or Wind Turbine OEMs, for the construction, installation, and operation of floating wind platforms globally. | Gazelle Wind Power plans to license the technology to energy Project Developers, EPCs, or Wind Turbine OEMs, for the construction, installation, and operation of floating wind platforms globally. | ||
We estimate that the Gazelle platform could offer significant (30%) cost savings over currently deployed platforms whilst minimizing the environmental impact on the sea bed. | We estimate that the Gazelle platform could offer significant (30%) cost savings over currently deployed platforms whilst minimizing the environmental impact on the sea bed. | ||
Line 31: | Line 29: | ||
Basin tests were performed in October 2019 at the Technical University of Naval Architects of the Polytechnic University of Madrid (CEHINAV) for a 2 MW model FOWT. | Basin tests were performed in October 2019 at the Technical University of Naval Architects of the Polytechnic University of Madrid (CEHINAV) for a 2 MW model FOWT. | ||
The first basin test model was at 1:100 scale and 2nd at 1/65th scale. The models were tested for two modes: operational (with the rotor exposed to wind thrust) and survival (with the rotor turned off due to wind overspeed). All testing met expectations from software simulations. | The first basin test model was at 1:100 scale and 2nd at 1/65th scale. The models were tested for two modes: operational (with the rotor exposed to wind thrust) and survival (with the rotor turned off due to wind overspeed). All testing met expectations from software simulations. | ||
Line 41: | Line 37: | ||
Gazelle Wind Power was named a finalist in the 23rd annual S&P Global Platts Global Energy Awards in two categories: Emerging Technology of the Year and the Rising Star Company Award. | Gazelle Wind Power was named a finalist in the 23rd annual S&P Global Platts Global Energy Awards in two categories: Emerging Technology of the Year and the Rising Star Company Award. | ||
'''Monetisation strategy''' | '''Monetisation strategy''' | ||
Line 68: | Line 60: | ||
PR/Marketing 3% | PR/Marketing 3% | ||
Accounting & Legal 2% | Accounting & Legal 2% | ||