Editing Tesla, Inc.

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 72: Line 72:
|date=November 11, 2014
|date=November 11, 2014
|access-date=October 3, 2018 |website=Business Insider}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Tesla Energy Generation And Storage Business: Q4 2020 Results |url=https://insideevs.com/news/482496/tesla-energy-generation-storage-q4-2020-results/ | date=January 27, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Elon Musk |url=https://www.forbes.com/profile/elon-musk/ |website=[[Forbes]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000156459021044307/tsla-pre14a_20210813.htm | title=Schedule 14A Information  | publisher=[[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]]}}</ref><ref name="10K_2022">{{cite web |title=Annual report Form 10-K 2022 Tesla Inc. |url=https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000095017023001409/tsla-20221231.htm |date=January 31, 2023 |publisher=[[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]]}}</ref>
|access-date=October 3, 2018 |website=Business Insider}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Tesla Energy Generation And Storage Business: Q4 2020 Results |url=https://insideevs.com/news/482496/tesla-energy-generation-storage-q4-2020-results/ | date=January 27, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Elon Musk |url=https://www.forbes.com/profile/elon-musk/ |website=[[Forbes]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000156459021044307/tsla-pre14a_20210813.htm | title=Schedule 14A Information  | publisher=[[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]]}}</ref><ref name="10K_2022">{{cite web |title=Annual report Form 10-K 2022 Tesla Inc. |url=https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000095017023001409/tsla-20221231.htm |date=January 31, 2023 |publisher=[[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]]}}</ref>
}}Energy production and consumption are responsible for 76% of annual human-caused greenhouse gas emissions<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" />, and Tesla is on a mission to accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy.<ref name=":3">https://www.tesla.com/about</ref>
}}Tesla is on a mission to accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy.<ref name=":3">https://www.tesla.com/about</ref>


The company sells and leases high-performance fully electric vehicles and energy generation and storage systems, and offers services related to its products. Tesla emphasises performance, attractive styling and the safety of its users in the design and manufacture of its products and is continuing to develop full self-driving technology for improved safety. The company also strives to lower the cost of ownership for its customers through continuous efforts to reduce manufacturing costs and by offering financial and other services tailored to its products.<ref name=":4">https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000156459021004599/tsla-10k_20201231.htm</ref>
The company sells and leases high-performance fully electric vehicles and energy generation and storage systems, and offers services related to its products. Tesla is an innovator that emphasises performance, attractive styling and the safety of its users in the design and manufacture of its products and is continuing to develop full self-driving technology for improved safety. The company also strives to lower the cost of ownership for its customers through continuous efforts to reduce manufacturing costs and by offering financial and other services tailored to its products.<ref name=":4">https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000156459021004599/tsla-10k_20201231.htm</ref>


Assuming that Tesla increases its share of the automotive market to 10% (from 2%) and other assumptions, the expected return of an investment in the company over the next five years is negative 24%, which equates to an annual return of negative 4%. In other words, an £100,000 investment in the company is expected to return £76,000 in five years time.
Assuming that Tesla increases its share of the automotive market to 10% (from 2%) and other assumptions, the expected return of an investment in the company over the next five years is negative 24%, which equates to an annual return of negative 4%. In other words, an £100,000 investment in the company is expected to return £76,000 in five years time.


The degree of risk associated with an investment in Tesla is 'high', with the shares having a beta that is 112% above the market (2.12 vs. 1). Furthermore, Tesla's shares exhibit a 'high' level of liquidity, as evidenced by its bid-ask margin of 0.0297%.
The degree of risk associated with an investment in Tesla is 'high', with the shares having a beta that is 112% above the market (2.12 vs. 1).
 
Accordingly, based on the assumptions provided on the Stockhub platform,  an investment in the company is considered to be a 'suitable' one for you if, among other criteria, your required:
* Return level is negative 4% per year or less in absolute terms;
* Risk level is 112% or more above the market risk level;
* Time horizon is five years or longer;
* Bid-ask margin is 0.0297% or more; and/or
* Objective is to help accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy.
 
'''Fun fact:''' Tesla, Inc. was named after inventor Nikola Tesla and was founded in 2003 by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning, not Elon Musk, who joined later as an investor and chairman.


==Operations==
==Operations==
Line 94: Line 85:
The idea of the company came about when the now founding team of the company realised that the current way that humankind is meeting its energy needs is unsustainable and bad for the planet.<ref name=":9">https://www.tesla.com/en_GB/blog/secret-tesla-motors-master-plan-just-between-you-and-me</ref>  
The idea of the company came about when the now founding team of the company realised that the current way that humankind is meeting its energy needs is unsustainable and bad for the planet.<ref name=":9">https://www.tesla.com/en_GB/blog/secret-tesla-motors-master-plan-just-between-you-and-me</ref>  


Currently, an estimated 85% of the world's energy needs are met by burning fossil fuels<ref>https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/30797/EGR2019.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y</ref>, and energy production and consumption are responsible for 76% of annual human-caused greenhouse gas emissions.<ref name=":1">https://www.climatewatchdata.org/ghg-emissions?breakBy=sector&chartType=percentage&end_year=2018&sectors=total-including-lucf&start_year=1990</ref><ref name=":2">https://www.wri.org/insights/4-charts-explain-greenhouse-gas-emissions-countries-and-sectors</ref>
Currently, an estimated 85% of the world's energy needs are met by burning fossil fuels<ref>https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/30797/EGR2019.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y</ref>, and energy production and consumption are responsible for 76% of annual human-caused greenhouse gas emissions.<ref>https://www.climatewatchdata.org/ghg-emissions?breakBy=sector&chartType=percentage&end_year=2018&sectors=total-including-lucf&start_year=1990</ref><ref>https://www.wri.org/insights/4-charts-explain-greenhouse-gas-emissions-countries-and-sectors</ref>


Researching into a better way to meet the energy needs, the team concluded that the best way to do so is to move to a solar electric economy, from a mine-and-burn hydrocarbon economy.<ref name=":9" />
Researching into a better way to meet the energy needs, the team concluded that the best way to do so is to move to a solar electric economy, from a mine-and-burn hydrocarbon economy.<ref name=":9" />
Line 115: Line 106:


====== Automotive sales ======
====== Automotive sales ======
As of 2nd June 2022, the company offers four main car models: Model S, Model 3, Model X and Model Y.
As of 11th August 2023, the company offers four main car models: Model S, Model 3, Model X and Model Y.


'''Model S'''
'''Model S'''
Line 149: Line 140:
! colspan="2" |Model X
! colspan="2" |Model X
! colspan="3" |Model 3
! colspan="3" |Model 3
! colspan="2" |Model Y
! colspan="3" |Model Y
|-
|-
!Type
!Type
Line 159: Line 150:
!Long Range<ref name=":14" />
!Long Range<ref name=":14" />
!Performance<ref name=":14" />
!Performance<ref name=":14" />
!Standard
!Long Range<ref name=":15">https://www.tesla.com/modely</ref>
!Long Range<ref name=":15">https://www.tesla.com/modely</ref>
!Performance<ref name=":15" />
!Performance<ref name=":15" />
Line 170: Line 162:
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
|Yes
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
Line 181: Line 174:
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |4.2 seconds
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |4.2 seconds
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |3.1 seconds
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |3.1 seconds
|5.0 seconds
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |4.8 seconds
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |4.8 seconds
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |3.5 seconds
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |3.5 seconds
Line 190: Line 184:
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |333 miles
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |333 miles
| style="background: red; color: white;" |272 miles
| style="background: red; color: white;" |272 miles
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |358 miles
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |333 miles
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |315 miles
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |315 miles
|279 miles
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |330 miles
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |330 miles
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |303 miles
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |303 miles
|-
|-
|What's the top speed of the vehicle?
|What's the top speed of the vehicle?
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |155 miles per hour
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |149 miles per hour
|style="background: green; color: white;" |200 miles per hour
|style="background: green; color: white;" |200 miles per hour
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |155 miles per hour
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |149 miles per hour
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |163 miles per hour
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |149 miles per hour
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |140 miles per hour
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |140 miles per hour
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |145 miles per hour
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |145 miles per hour
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |162 miles per hour
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |162 miles per hour
|135 miles per hour
| style="background: red; color: white;" |135 miles per hour
| style="background: red; color: white;" |135 miles per hour
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |155 miles per hour
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |155 miles per hour
Line 214: Line 210:
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |Sedan (i.e. car)
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |Sedan (i.e. car)
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |Sedan (i.e. car)
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |Sedan (i.e. car)
|SUV (i.e. car)
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |SUV (i.e. car)
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |SUV (i.e. car)
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |SUV (i.e. car)
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |SUV (i.e. car)
Line 225: Line 222:
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 out of 5 stars
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 out of 5 stars
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 out of 5 stars
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 out of 5 stars
|5 out of 5 stars
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 out of 5 stars
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 out of 5 stars
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 out of 5 stars
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 out of 5 stars
Line 236: Line 234:
|style="background: red; color: white;" |5 seats
|style="background: red; color: white;" |5 seats
|style="background: red; color: white;" |5 seats
|style="background: red; color: white;" |5 seats
|5 seats
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |7 seats
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |7 seats
|style="background: red; color: white;" |5 seats
|style="background: red; color: white;" |5 seats
Line 242: Line 241:
| style="background: red; color: white;" |28 cubic feet
| style="background: red; color: white;" |28 cubic feet
|style="background: red; color: white;" |28 cubic feet
|style="background: red; color: white;" |28 cubic feet
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |88 cubic feet
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |92 cubic feet
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |88 cubic feet
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |92 cubic feet
| style="background: red; color: white;" |23 cubic feet
| style="background: red; color: white;" |23 cubic feet
|style="background: red; color: white;" |23 cubic feet
|style="background: red; color: white;" |23 cubic feet
|style="background: red; color: white;" |23 cubic feet
|style="background: red; color: white;" |23 cubic feet
|76 cubic feet
| style="background: red; color: white;" |76 cubic feet
| style="background: red; color: white;" |76 cubic feet
|style="background: red; color: white;" |76 cubic feet
|style="background: red; color: white;" |76 cubic feet
Line 258: Line 258:
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |All-wheel drive
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |All-wheel drive
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |All-wheel drive
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |All-wheel drive
|All-wheel drive
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |All-wheel drive
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |All-wheel drive
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |All-wheel drive
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |All-wheel drive
|-
|-
|What's the price of the vehicle?
|What's the price of the vehicle?
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |$99,990
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |$88,490
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$135,990
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$108,490
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |$114,990
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |$98,490
|style="background: red; color: white;" |$138,990
|style="background: red; color: white;" |$108,490
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$46,990
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$40,240
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$55,990
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$47,240
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$62,990
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$53,240
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |$62,990
|$47,740
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$67,990
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |$52,990
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$54,490
|-
|-
|What's the vehicle's price per cargo capacity?
|What's the vehicle's price per cargo capacity?
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |$3,571 per cubic feet
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |$3,160 per cubic feet
|style="background: red; color: white;" |$4,857 per cubic feet
|style="background: red; color: white;" |$3,875 per cubic feet
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |$1,307 per cubic feet
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |$1,071 per cubic feet
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$1,579 per cubic feet
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$1,179 per cubic feet
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |$2,043 per cubic feet
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |$1,750 per cubic feet
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$2,434 per cubic feet
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$2,054 per cubic feet
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$2,739 per cubic feet
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$2,315 per cubic feet
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$829 per cubic feet
|$628 per cubic feet
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$895 per cubic feet
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$697 per cubic feet
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$717 per cubic feet
|-
|-
|What's the vehicle's price per seat?
|What's the vehicle's price per seat?
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |$19,998 per seat
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |$17,698 per seat
|style="background: red; color: white;" |$27,198 per seat
|style="background: red; color: white;" |$21,698 per seat
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |$16,427 per seat
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |$14,070 per seat
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$23,165 per seat
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$18,082 per seat
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |$9,398 per seat
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |$8,048 per seat
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$11,198 per seat
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$9,448 per seat
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$12,598 per seat
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$10,648 per seat
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$8,999 per seat
|$9,548 per seat
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$13,598 per seat
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$7,570 per seat
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$10,898 per seat
|}
|}


Line 315: Line 319:
|Which Tesla car has the largest cargo capacity?
|Which Tesla car has the largest cargo capacity?
|Model X and Model X Plaid
|Model X and Model X Plaid
|The cargo capacity of the car is 88 cubic feet.
|The cargo capacity of the car is 92 cubic feet.
|-
|-
|Which Tesla car has the most seats?
|Which Tesla car has the most seats?
Line 323: Line 327:
|Which Tesla car is the lowest priced?
|Which Tesla car is the lowest priced?
|Model 3 Rear-Wheel Drive
|Model 3 Rear-Wheel Drive
|The price of the car is $46,990.
|The price of the car is $40,240.
|-
|-
|Which Tesla car has the lowest price per cargo capacity?
|Which Tesla car has the lowest price per cargo capacity?
|Model Y Long Range
|Model Y Standard
|The price per cargo capacity of the car is $829 per cubic feet.
|The price per cargo capacity of the car is $628 per cubic feet.
|-
|-
|Which Tesla car has the lowest price per seat?
|Which Tesla car has the lowest price per seat?
|Model Y Long Range
|Model Y Long Range
|The price per seat of the car is $8,999 per seat.
|The price per seat of the car is $7,570 per seat.
|}
|}


Line 368: Line 372:
'''Cybertruck'''
'''Cybertruck'''


Cybertruck is a truck, a motor vehicle designed to transport cargo, carry specialised payloads, or perform other utilitarian work. What will be unique about the offering is that it will be the safest vehicle that Tesla provides. The price of the offering is expected to be $39,900.<ref>https://www.autoexpress.co.uk/tesla/cybertruck/96447/tesla-cybertruck-delayed-until-least-2023#:~:text=Tesla%20Cybertruck%3A%20performance%20and%20range&text=Entry%2Dlevel%2C%20Single%20Motor%2C,a%20top%20speed%20of%20110mph.</ref>
Cybertruck is a truck, a motor vehicle designed to transport cargo, carry specialised payloads, or perform other utilitarian work. What will be unique about the offering is that it will be the safest vehicle that Tesla provides- combining both ultra-hard 30x cold-rolled stainless steel and Tesla Armor Glass. The price of the offering is expected to be $39,900.<ref>https://www.autoexpress.co.uk/tesla/cybertruck/96447/tesla-cybertruck-delayed-until-least-2023#:~:text=Tesla%20Cybertruck%3A%20performance%20and%20range&text=Entry%2Dlevel%2C%20Single%20Motor%2C,a%20top%20speed%20of%20110mph.</ref>


[[File:Cybertruck-Hero-Desktop.jpg]]
[[File:Cybertruck-Hero-Desktop.jpg]]
Line 380: Line 384:
'''Tesla Semi'''
'''Tesla Semi'''


Tesla Semi is a semi-trailer truck, a motor vehicle that is designed to transport large cargo, via one or more of its attached trailers. What will be unique about the offering is that it will be the largest cargo capacity vehicle that Tesla provides. The price of the offering is around $150,000.
Tesla Semi is a semi-trailer truck, a motor vehicle that is designed to transport large cargo, via one or more of its attached trailers. What will be unique about the offering is that it will be the largest cargo capacity vehicle that Tesla provides. Moreover, operators will see approximate savings of $200,000 after three years because charging with electricity is cheaper than refueling with diesel. The price of the offering is around $150,000.


[[File:Tesla-semi.jpg]]
[[File:Tesla-semi.jpg]]
Line 397: Line 401:
'''Powerwall'''
'''Powerwall'''


Powerwall is a energy storage system (i.e. a type of battery).<ref name=":4" /> What’s unique about the offering is that it's the lowest priced energy storage system that Tesla provides, selling at $10,500. The energy capacity of the product is 13.5 kilowatt hour (kWh). To help put the capacity into perspective, in 2020, the average household in the United States consumed 29 kWh per day.<ref>https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=97&t=3#:~:text=How%20much%20electricity%20does%20an,about%20893%20kWh%20per%20month.</ref> So, if the average household is powered from Powerwalls only, then it will require around two Powerwalls to power the whole house, at an average annual cost of $2,247.
Powerwall is a energy storage system (i.e. a type of battery).<ref name=":4" /> What’s unique about the offering is that it's the lowest priced energy storage system that Tesla provides, selling at $10,500. The energy capacity of the product is 13.5 kilowatt hour (kWh). To help put the capacity into perspective, in 2020, the average household in the United States consumed 29 kWh per day.<ref>https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=97&t=3#:~:text=How%20much%20electricity%20does%20an,about%20893%20kWh%20per%20month.</ref> So, if the average household is powered from Powerwalls only, then it will require around two Powerwalls to power the whole house, at an average annual cost of $2,247. Furthermore, Tesla offers its Powerwall buyers a $500 rebate for each Powerwall registered between June and October 2023.


[[File:Powerwall2.jpg]]
[[File:Powerwall2.jpg]]
Line 462: Line 466:
# Develop a self-driving capability that is 10x safer than manual, via massive fleet learning; and
# Develop a self-driving capability that is 10x safer than manual, via massive fleet learning; and
# Enable your car to make money for you when you aren't using it.
# Enable your car to make money for you when you aren't using it.
It's worth noting that 10 years earlier than the publication of the 2016 blog post, Elon detailed the company's first master plan<ref name=":9" />, and the company has managed to achieve all of the milestones, which were as follows:
It's worth noting that 10 years earlier than the publication of the 2016 blog post, Elon Musk detailed the company's first master plan<ref name=":9" />, and the company has managed to achieve all of the milestones, which were as follows:


#Build a sports car (i.e. the Tesla Model S);
#Build a sports car (i.e. the Tesla Model S);
Line 484: Line 488:


Here, the serviceable obtainable market (SOM) is defined as the US car market, and based on a number of assumptions, it is estimated that the size of the market as of today (30th May 2022), in terms of revenue, is $262 billion.
Here, the serviceable obtainable market (SOM) is defined as the US car market, and based on a number of assumptions, it is estimated that the size of the market as of today (30th May 2022), in terms of revenue, is $262 billion.
=== Industry Demand Drivers ===
The mayor drivers of industry performance within the electric and hybrid US vehicle manufacturing market are:<ref>https://0-my-ibisworld-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/us/en/industry-specialized/od4516/industry-performance</ref>
# '''Consumer confidence index:''' When consumers have less disposable income, they tend to delay purchases. The consumer confidence index plummeted during 2020 and is expected to further decrease during 2023 due to the expected recession.
# '''Demand from new car dealers:''' The financial crisis has greatly affected dealers as companies have struggled to find enough funds to stock their showrooms.
# '''World price of crude oil:''' Through 2023, the price of gasoline has grown, and consequently consumers have started to consider more purchasing more energy efficient vehicles like hybrid or electric cars.
# '''Trade-weighted index:''' Levels of international trade are affected by the relative strength of the US dollar to other international currencies. The trade-weighted index measures the value of the US dollar against key trading partner currencies.
# '''Tax credits for energy efficiency:''' Tax credits are expected to increase during 2023, which in turn incentivise demand for electric and hybrid cars. Customers have received up to $7,500 in tax credits.


== Competition==
== Competition==
Line 490: Line 503:


Tesla believes that its vehicles compete in the market both based on their traditional segment classification as well as based on their propulsion technology. For example, Model S and Model X compete primarily with premium sedans and premium SUVs, and Model 3 and Model Y compete with small to medium-sized sedans and compact SUVs, which are extremely competitive markets. Competing products typically include internal combustion vehicles from more established automobile manufacturers; however, many established and new automobile manufacturers have entered or have announced plans to enter the market for electric and other alternative fuel vehicles. Many major automobile manufacturers have electric vehicles available today in major markets including the US, China and Europe, and other current and prospective automobile manufacturers are also developing electric vehicles. In addition, several manufacturers offer hybrid vehicles, including plug-in versions.  
Tesla believes that its vehicles compete in the market both based on their traditional segment classification as well as based on their propulsion technology. For example, Model S and Model X compete primarily with premium sedans and premium SUVs, and Model 3 and Model Y compete with small to medium-sized sedans and compact SUVs, which are extremely competitive markets. Competing products typically include internal combustion vehicles from more established automobile manufacturers; however, many established and new automobile manufacturers have entered or have announced plans to enter the market for electric and other alternative fuel vehicles. Many major automobile manufacturers have electric vehicles available today in major markets including the US, China and Europe, and other current and prospective automobile manufacturers are also developing electric vehicles. In addition, several manufacturers offer hybrid vehicles, including plug-in versions.  
Moreover, Tesla holds a 51.9% market share within the Hybrid and Electric US vehicle manufacturing market in 2023.<ref>https://0-my-ibisworld-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/us/en/industry-specialized/od4516/industry-performance</ref> Other competitors within this market include Toyota Motor, Ford Motor Co, Honda Motor Co, and General Motors Company. 


Tesla also believes that there is increasing competition for its vehicle offerings as a platform for delivering self-driving technologies, charging offerings and other features and services, and it expects to compete in this developing market through continued progress on its autopilot, full self-driving and neural network capabilities, Supercharger network and its infotainment offerings.
Tesla also believes that there is increasing competition for its vehicle offerings as a platform for delivering self-driving technologies, charging offerings and other features and services, and it expects to compete in this developing market through continued progress on its autopilot, full self-driving and neural network capabilities, Supercharger network and its infotainment offerings.
Line 511: Line 526:
[[File:Elon Musk Royal Society (crop2).jpg|200px]]
[[File:Elon Musk Royal Society (crop2).jpg|200px]]


The Chief Executive Officer of Tesla is {{#property:P169|from=Q478214}} and he has served the position since October 2008 and as a member of the Board since April 2004. Elon has also served as Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technology Officer and Chairman of Space Exploration Technologies Corporation, an advanced rocket and spacecraft manufacturing and services company (“SpaceX ”), since May 2002, and served as Chairman of the Board of SolarCity Corporation, a solar installation company, from July 2006 until its acquisition by Tesla in November 2016. Elon is also a founder of The Boring Company, an infrastructure company, and of Neuralink Corp., a company focused on developing brain-machine interfaces. Prior to SpaceX, Elon co-founded PayPal, an electronic payment system, which was acquired by eBay in October 2002, and Zip2 Corporation, a provider of Internet enterprise software and services, which was acquired by Compaq in March 1999. Elon has also served on the board of directors of Endeavor Group Holdings, Inc. since April 2021. Elon holds a B.A. in physics from the University of Pennsylvania and a B.S. in business from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
Elon Musk is the Chief Executive Officer of Tesla and has served the position since October 2008 and as a member of the Board since April 2004. Elon has also served as Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technology Officer and Chairman of Space Exploration Technologies Corporation, an advanced rocket and spacecraft manufacturing and services company (“SpaceX ”), since May 2002, and served as Chairman of the Board of SolarCity Corporation, a solar installation company, from July 2006 until its acquisition by Tesla in November 2016 and served as Chief Executive Officer of Twitter, Inc., a social media company, since October 2022. Elon is also a founder of The Boring Company, an infrastructure company, and of Neuralink Corp., a company focused on developing brain-machine interfaces. Prior to SpaceX, Elon co-founded PayPal, an electronic payment system, which was acquired by eBay in October 2002, and Zip2 Corporation, a provider of Internet enterprise software and services, which was acquired by Compaq in March 1999. Elon has also served on the board of directors of Endeavor Group Holdings, Inc. since April 2021. Elon holds a B.A. in physics from the University of Pennsylvania and a B.S. in business from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.


====Chief Financial Officer====
====Chief Financial Officer====
Line 525: Line 540:
Andrew Baglino has served as Tesla's Senior Vice President, Powertrain and Energy Engineering since October 2019. Previously, Drew served in various engineering positions continuously since joining Tesla in March 2006. Drew holds a B.S. in electrical engineering from Stanford University.
Andrew Baglino has served as Tesla's Senior Vice President, Powertrain and Energy Engineering since October 2019. Previously, Drew served in various engineering positions continuously since joining Tesla in March 2006. Drew holds a B.S. in electrical engineering from Stanford University.


'''Senior Vice President'''
Tom Zhu has served as Senior Vice President, Automotive since April 2023. Mr. Zhu joined Tesla in April 2014, and served in various operational roles before being appointed as Vice President, Greater China, where he led the construction and operations of Gigafactory Shanghai. Mr. Zhu holds a bachelor’s degree of commerce in information technology from the Auckland University of Technology and an M.B.A. from Duke University.
===Board of Directors===
===Board of Directors===


Line 553: Line 571:
<noglossary>‎Ira received his JD/MBA from Stanford Graduate School of Business and Stanford Law School, where he was an Associate Editor of Stanford Law Review. He holds a B.A. from the University of California, Los Angeles, graduating Phi Beta Kappa and Summa Cum Laude.</noglossary>   
<noglossary>‎Ira received his JD/MBA from Stanford Graduate School of Business and Stanford Law School, where he was an Associate Editor of Stanford Law Review. He holds a B.A. from the University of California, Los Angeles, graduating Phi Beta Kappa and Summa Cum Laude.</noglossary>   


'''Larry Ellison'''
'''Joe Gebbia'''


[[File:1029px-Larry Ellison picture.png|200px]]
Mr. Gebbia has been a member of the Board since 2022. Mr. Gebbia co-founded Airbnb, Inc. in 2008 and has served on Airbnb’s board of directors since 2009. In 2022, Mr. Gebbia launched Samara, which produces fully customized, factory-made homes designed to create rental income, house family, support work from home, or bundled together, to form new types of housing communities. Mr. Gebbia received dual degrees in Graphic Design and Industrial Design from the Rhode Island School of Design, where he currently serves on the institution’s Board of Trustees. Mr. Gebbia is the Chairman of Airbnb.org, and also serves on the Olympic Refuge Foundation and leadership councils for UNHCR, Tent.org and Malala Fund. Mr. Gebbia is a sought-after speaker on design and entrepreneurship, and has been named in Business Week’s Top 20 Best Young Tech Entrepreneurs, Inc. Magazine’s Thirty-under-Thirty, Fortune’s Forty-under-Forty, and one of Fast Company’s Most Creative People.
 
Lawrence J. Ellison has been a member of the Board since December 2018. Mr. Ellison is the founder of Oracle Corporation, a software and technology company, has served as its Chief Technical Officer since September 2014 and previously served as its Chief Executive Officer from June 1977 to September 2014. Mr. Ellison has also served on Oracle’s board of directors since June 1977, including as its Chairman since September 2014 and previously from May 1995 to January 2004.
 
'''Hiro Mizuno'''
 
[[File:9H 8h7tW40QNtdH1Y ZsVOj-lnmRMD4R2MAuxy1ajM.jpg|200px]]
 
Hiromichi Mizuno has been a member of Board since April 2020. Since January 2021, Mr. Mizuno has served as the United Nations Special Envoy on Innovative Finance and Sustainable Investments. From January 2015 to March 2020, Mr. Mizuno served as Executive Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Japan’s Government Pension Investment Fund, the largest pension fund in the world. Previously, Mr. Mizuno was a partner at Coller Capital, a private equity firm, from 2003. In addition to being a career-long finance and investment professional, Mr. Mizuno has served as a board member of numerous business, government and other organizations, currently including the Mission Committee of Danone S.A., a global food products company, and the World Economic Forum’s Global Future Council. Mr. Mizuno is also involved in academia, having been named to leadership or advisory roles at Harvard University, Oxford University, University of Cambridge, Northwestern University and Osaka University. Mr. Mizuno holds a B.A. in Law from Osaka City University and an M.B.A. from the Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University.


'''James Murdoch'''
'''James Murdoch'''
Line 570: Line 580:


James Murdoch has been a member of the Board since July 2017. Since March 2019, Mr. Murdoch has been the Chief Executive Officer of Lupa Systems, a private investment company that he founded. Previously, Mr. Murdoch held a number of leadership roles at Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. (“21CF”), a media company, over two decades, including its Chief Executive Officer from 2015 to March 2019, its Co-Chief Operating Officer from 2014 to 2015, its Deputy Chief Operating Officer and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, International from 2011 to 2014 and its Chairman and Chief Executive, Europe and Asia from 2007 to 2011. Previously, he served as the Chief Executive Officer of Sky plc from 2003 to 2007, and as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of STAR Group Limited, a subsidiary of 21CF, from 2000 to 2003. Mr. Murdoch also formerly served on the boards of News Corporation from 2013 to July 2020, of 21CF from 2017 to 2019, of Sky plc from 2016 to 2018, of GlaxoSmithKline plc from 2009 to 2012 and of Sotheby’s from 2010 to 2012.
James Murdoch has been a member of the Board since July 2017. Since March 2019, Mr. Murdoch has been the Chief Executive Officer of Lupa Systems, a private investment company that he founded. Previously, Mr. Murdoch held a number of leadership roles at Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. (“21CF”), a media company, over two decades, including its Chief Executive Officer from 2015 to March 2019, its Co-Chief Operating Officer from 2014 to 2015, its Deputy Chief Operating Officer and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, International from 2011 to 2014 and its Chairman and Chief Executive, Europe and Asia from 2007 to 2011. Previously, he served as the Chief Executive Officer of Sky plc from 2003 to 2007, and as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of STAR Group Limited, a subsidiary of 21CF, from 2000 to 2003. Mr. Murdoch also formerly served on the boards of News Corporation from 2013 to July 2020, of 21CF from 2017 to 2019, of Sky plc from 2016 to 2018, of GlaxoSmithKline plc from 2009 to 2012 and of Sotheby’s from 2010 to 2012.
'''JB Straubel'''
Mr. Straubel is the Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Redwood Materials Inc., a Nevada-based company working to drive down the costs and environmental footprint of lithium-ion batteries by offering large-scale sources of domestic anode and cathode materials produced from recycled batteries. Mr. Straubel also co-founded and served as the Chief Technology Officer of Tesla from May 2005 to July 2019. Mr. Straubel previously served on the board of SolarCity Corporation and as a member of its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee from August 2006 until its acquisition by Tesla in November 2016. Mr. Straubel has served on the board of directors of QuantumScape since November 2020. Mr. Straubel holds a B.S. in Energy Systems Engineering and a M.S. in Engineering, with an emphasis on energy conversion, from Stanford University.


'''Kimbal Musk'''
'''Kimbal Musk'''
Line 599: Line 613:


==== All periods ====
==== All periods ====
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible"
|+Financials<ref>Source: Stockhub Limited</ref><ref group="Note" name="Note04" /><ref>Source: Stockhub Limited</ref><ref name="Note04" group="Note" />
|+Historic financials<ref>Source: Stockhub Limited</ref><ref group="Note" name="Note04" />
|-
|-
!Year  
!Year  
Line 617: Line 631:
!'''17'''
!'''17'''
!18
!18
!18
!19
!20
!21
!22
!23
!24
!25
!26
!27
!28
!29
!30
!31
!32
!33
!34
!35
!36
!37
!38
!39
!40
!41
!42
!43
!44
!45
!46
!47
!48
!49
!50
!51
!52
!53
!54
!55
!56
!57
!58
!59
|-
|-
|'''Year end date'''||'''31/12/2005'''||'''31/12/2006<ref name=":12">{{cite web|url=https://www.mercurynews.com/2014/07/14/2006-san-carlos-start-up-tesla-seeks-sexier-electric-car/|title=2006: San Carlos start-up Tesla seeks sexier electric car|date=July 14, 2014}}</ref><ref name="SEC">{{cite web | url=https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1318605 | title=Tesla, Inc. TSLA on Nasdaq | publisher=[[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]]}}</ref>'''||'''31/12/2007'''||'''31/12/2008'''||'''31/12/2009'''
|'''Year end date'''||'''31/12/2005'''||'''31/12/2006<ref name=":12">{{cite web|url=https://www.mercurynews.com/2014/07/14/2006-san-carlos-start-up-tesla-seeks-sexier-electric-car/|title=2006: San Carlos start-up Tesla seeks sexier electric car|date=July 14, 2014}}</ref><ref name="SEC">{{cite web | url=https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1318605 | title=Tesla, Inc. TSLA on Nasdaq | publisher=[[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]]}}</ref>'''||'''31/12/2007'''||'''31/12/2008'''||'''31/12/2009'''
|'''31/12/2010<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2010<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2011<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2011<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2012<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2012<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2013<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2013<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2014<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2014<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2015<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2015<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2016<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2016<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2017<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2017<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2018<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2018<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2019<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2019<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2020<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2020<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2021<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2021<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2022'''
|'''31/12/2022'''
|'''31/12/2022'''
|-
|'''31/12/2023'''
| colspan="19" |<div style="text-align: center;">'''Income statement'''</div>
|'''31/12/2024'''
|-
|'''31/12/2025'''
|Revenues ($'million)|| 0||0||0.073||15||112
|'''31/12/2026'''
|117
|'''31/12/2027'''
|204
|'''31/12/2028'''
|413
|'''31/12/2029'''
|2,013
|'''31/12/2030'''
|3,198
|'''31/12/2031'''
|4,046
|'''31/12/2032'''
|7,000
|'''31/12/2033'''
|11,759
|'''31/12/2034'''
|21,461
|'''31/12/2035'''
|24,578
|'''31/12/2036'''
|31,536
|'''31/12/2037'''
|53,823
|'''31/12/2038'''
|81,462
|'''31/12/2039'''
|-
|'''31/12/2040'''
|Net profits ($'million)||style="color: red;" |-12||style="color: red;" |-30||style="color: red;" |-78||style="color: red;" |-83|| style="color: red;" |−56
|'''31/12/2041'''
|style="color: red;" |−154
|'''31/12/2042'''
|style="color: red;" |−254
|'''31/12/2043'''
|style="color: red;" |−396
|'''31/12/2044'''
|style="color: red;" |−74
|'''31/12/2045'''
|style="color: red;" |−294
|'''31/12/2046'''
|style="color: red;" |−889
|'''31/12/2047'''
|style="color: red;" |−675
|'''31/12/2048'''
|style="color: red;" |−1,962
|'''31/12/2049'''
|style="color: red;" |−976
|'''31/12/2050'''
|style="color: red;" |−862
|'''31/12/2051'''
|721
|'''31/12/2052'''
|5,519
|'''31/12/2053'''
|12,556
|'''31/12/2054'''
|-
|'''31/12/2055'''
| colspan="19" |<div style="text-align: center;">'''Balance sheet'''</div>
|'''31/12/2056'''
|-
|'''31/12/2057'''
|Total assets<br />($'million)
|'''31/12/2058'''
|8
|'''31/12/2059'''
|44
|'''31/12/2060'''
|34
|'''31/12/2061'''
|52
|'''31/12/2062'''
|130
|'''31/12/2063'''
|386
|713
|1,114
|2,417
|5,831
|8,068
|22,664
|28,655
|29,740
|34,309
|52,148
|62,131
|82,338
|-
| colspan="19" |<div style="text-align: center;">'''Other'''</div>
|-
|-
|
|Employees
|'''Historic'''
|NA
|'''Historic'''
|70
|'''Historic'''
|268
|'''Historic'''
|252
|'''Historic'''
|514
|'''Historic'''
|899
|'''Historic'''
|1,417
|'''Historic'''
|2,914
|'''Historic'''
|5,859
|'''Historic'''
|10,161
|'''Historic'''
|13,058
|'''Historic'''
|17,782
|'''Historic'''
|37,543
|'''Historic'''
|48,817
|'''Historic'''
|48,016
|'''Historic'''
|70,757
|'''Historic'''
|99,290
|'''Historic'''
|127,855
|'''Forecast'''
|}
|'''Forecast'''
 
|'''Forecast'''
=== Forward ===
|'''Forecast'''
 
|'''Forecast'''
====What are the financial forecasts?====
|'''Forecast'''
{| class="wikitable"
|'''Forecast'''
|+Forward financials<ref>Source: Stockhub Limited</ref><ref group="Note" name="Note04" />
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|
|-
|-
| colspan="61" |<div style="text-align: center;">'''Income statement'''</div>
!Year
|-
!18 !!19!!20!!21!!22
|Revenues ($'million)|| 0||0||0.073||15||112
!23
|117
!24
|204
!25
|413
!26
|2,013
!27
|3,198
!28
|4,046
!29
|7,000
!30
|11,759
!31
|21,461
!32
|24,578
!33
|31,536
!34
|53,823
!35
|81,462
!36
|$78,935
!37
|$112,257
!38
|$154,816
!39
|$207,049
!40
|$268,527
!41
|$337,721
!42
|$411,894
!43
|$487,157
!44
|$558,739
!45
|$621,448
!46
|$670,282
!47
|$701,078
!48
|$711,102
!49
|$699,445
!50
|$667,163
!51
|$617,116
!52
|$553,551
!53
|$481,510
!54
|$406,171
!55
|$332,253
!56
|$263,564
!57
|$202,749
!58
|$151,247
!59
|$109,414
|-
|$76,757
|'''Year end date'''||'''31/12/2022'''||'''31/12/2023'''||'''31/12/2024'''||'''31/12/2025'''||'''31/12/2026'''
|$52,217
|'''31/12/2027'''
|$34,448
|'''31/12/2028'''
|$22,038
|'''31/12/2029'''
|$13,673
|'''31/12/2030'''
|$8,226
|'''31/12/2031'''
|$4,799
|'''31/12/2032'''
|$2,715
|'''31/12/2033'''
|$1,490
|'''31/12/2034'''
|$793
|'''31/12/2035'''
|$409
|'''31/12/2036'''
|$205
|'''31/12/2037'''
|$99
|'''31/12/2038'''
|$47
|'''31/12/2039'''
|$21
|'''31/12/2040'''
|$9
|'''31/12/2041'''
|$4
|'''31/12/2042'''
|$2
|'''31/12/2043'''
|-
|'''31/12/2044'''
|Gross profits ($'million)
|'''31/12/2045'''
|
|'''31/12/2046'''
|
|'''31/12/2047'''
|
|'''31/12/2048'''
|
|'''31/12/2049'''
|
|'''31/12/2050'''
|
|'''31/12/2051'''
|
|'''31/12/2052'''
|
|'''31/12/2053'''
|
|'''31/12/2054'''
|
|'''31/12/2055'''
|
|'''31/12/2056'''
|
|'''31/12/2057'''
|
|'''31/12/2058'''
|
|'''31/12/2059'''
|
|'''31/12/2060'''
|
|'''31/12/2061'''
|
|'''31/12/2062'''
|
|'''31/12/2063'''
|$23,680
|-
|$33,677
| colspan="43" |<div style="text-align: center;">'''Income statement'''</div>
|$46,445
|-
|$62,115
|Revenues ($'million)|| $78,935||$112,257||$154,816||$207,049||$268,527
|$80,558
|$337,721
|$101,316
|$411,894
|$185,352
|$487,157
|$219,221
|$558,739
|$251,432
|$621,448
|$279,652
|$670,282
|$301,627
|$701,078
|$315,485
|$711,102
|$319,996
|$699,445
|$314,750
|$667,163
|$300,223
|$617,116
|$277,702
|$553,551
|$249,098
|$481,510
|$216,679
|$406,171
|$182,777
|$332,253
|$149,514
|$263,564
|$118,604
|$202,749
|$91,237
|$151,247
|$68,061
|$109,414
|$49,236
|$76,757
|$34,541
|$52,217
|$23,498
|$34,448
|$15,502
|$22,038
|$9,917
|$13,673
|$6,153
|$8,226
|$3,702
|$4,799
|$2,160
|$2,715
|$1,222
|$1,490
|$670
|$793
|$357
|$409
|$184
|$205
|$92
|$99
|$45
|$47
|$21
|$21
|$10
|$9
|$4
|$4
|$2
|$2
|$1
|-
|-
|Operating profits ($'million)
|Gross profits ($'million)||$23,680||$33,677||$46,445||$62,115||$80,558
|
|$101,316
|
|$185,352
|
|$219,221
|
|$251,432
|
|$279,652
|
|$301,627
|
|$315,485
|
|$319,996
|
|$314,750
|
|$300,223
|
|$277,702
|
|$249,098
|
|$216,679
|
|$182,777
|
|$149,514
|
|$118,604
|
|$91,237
|
|$68,061
|$11,840
|$49,236
|$16,839
|$34,541
|$23,222
|$23,498
|$31,057
|$15,502
|$40,279
|$9,917
|$6,153
|$3,702
|$2,160
|$1,222
|$670
|$357
|$184
|$92
|$45
|$21
|$10
|$4
|$2
|$1
|-
|Operating profits ($'million)||$11,840||$16,839||$23,222||$31,057||$40,279
|$50,658
|$50,658
|$123,568
|$123,568
Line 962: Line 928:
|$1
|$1
|-
|-
|Net profits ($'million)|| style="color: red;" |-12|| style="color: red;" |-30|| style="color: red;" |-78|| style="color: red;" |-83|| style="color: red;" |−56
|Net profits ($'million)||$9,354||$13,302||$18,346||$24,535|| $31,820
| style="color: red;" |−154
| style="color: red;" |−254
| style="color: red;" |−396
| style="color: red;" |−74
| style="color: red;" |−294
| style="color: red;" |−889
| style="color: red;" |−675
| style="color: red;" |−1,962
| style="color: red;" |−976
| style="color: red;" |−862
|721
|5,519
|12,556
|$9,354
|$13,302
|$18,346
|$24,535
|$31,820
|$40,020
|$40,020
|$97,619
|$97,619
Line 1,018: Line 966:
|$1
|$1
|$0
|$0
|}
==== What are the assumptions used to estimate the financial forecasts?====
{| class="wikitable"
|+Key inputs
!Description
!Value
!Commentary
|-
|-
| colspan="61" |<div style="text-align: center;">'''Balance sheet'''</div>
| colspan="3" | <div style="text-align: center;">'''Revenue'''</div>
|-
|-
|Total assets<br />($'million)
|What's the estimated current size of the total addressable market?
|8
|$2,975,000,000
|44
|Here, the total addressable market (TAM) is defined as the global automotive market, and based on a number of assumptions<ref group="Note" name="Note01" />, it is estimated that the size of the market as of today (30th May 2022), in terms of revenue, is $2.975 trillion.
|34
 
|52
 
|130
If the TAM is defined as the global energy market, then research suggests that the estimated size of the market is $6.777 trillion.<ref name=":16">https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/sustainable/sites/bartlett/files/an_exploration_of_energy_cost_ranges_limits_and_adjustment_process.pdf</ref>
|386
|-
|713
|What is the estimated company lifespan?
|1,114
|60 years
|2,417
|Tesla employs around 110,000, making the company a large organisation (more than 10,000 employees), and research shows that the average lifespan of a large corporation is around 50 years.<ref>Stadler, Enduring Success, 3–5.</ref>
|5,831
|-
|8,068
|What's the estimated annual growth rate of the total addressable market over the lifecycle of the company?
|22,664
|3%
|28,655
|Research shows that the growth rate of the global automotive market (i.e. the total addressable market) is similar to the growth rate of global gross domestic product<ref>http://www.robertpicard.net/files/econgrowthandadvertising.pdf</ref>, which has averaged (medium) around 3% per year in the last 20 years (2001 to 2022)<ref>https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/WLD/world/gdp-growth-rate</ref>.
|29,740
|-
|34,309
|What's the estimated company peak market share?
|52,148
|10%
|62,131
|The Stockhub users estimate that especially given the leadership of the company, the peak market share of Tesla is around 10%, and, therefore, suggests using the share amount here. As of 31st December 2021, Tesla's current share of the market is estimated at around 1.8%.
|82,338
|-
|
|Which distribution function do you want to use to estimate company revenue?
|
|Gaussian
|
|Research suggests that the revenue pattern of companies is similar to the pattern produced by the Gaussian distribution function  (i.e. the revenue distribution is bell shaped)<ref>http://escml.umd.edu/Papers/ObsCPMT.pdf</ref>, so the Stockhub users suggest using that function here.
|
|-
|
|What's the estimated standard deviation of company revenue?
|
| 6 years
|
|Another way of asking this question is this way: within how many years either side of the mean does 68% of revenue occur? Based on Tesla's current revenue amount (i.e. $54 billion) and Tesla's estimated lifespan (i.e. 60 years) and Tesla's estimated current stage of its lifecycle (i.e. growth stage), the Stockhub users suggest using 6 years (i.e. 68% of all sales happen within 6 years either side of the mean year), so that's what's used here.
|
|-
|
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stages</div>'''
|
|-
|
|How many main stages of growth is the company expected to go through?
|
| 4 stages
|
|Research suggests that a company typically goes through four distinct stages of cash flow growth.<ref>Levie J, Lichtenstein BB (2010) A terminal assessment of stages theory: Introducing a dynamic approach to entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 34(2): 317–350. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00377.x</nowiki></ref> Research also shows that incorporating those stages into the discounted cash flow model improves the quality of the model and, ultimately, the quality of the value estimation.<ref>Stef Hinfelaar et al.:, 2019.</ref>
|
 
|
In addition, research shows that a key way to determine the stage which a company is in is by examining the cash flow patterns of the company.<ref>Dickinson, 2010.</ref> A summary of the economic links to cash flow patterns can be found in the appendix of this report. The Stockhub users estimate that with Tesla's operating cash flows positive (+), investing cash flows negative (-) and its financing cash flows positive (+), the company is in the second stage of growth (i.e. the 'growth' stage), and, therefore, it has a total of three main stages of growth. Note, to account for one-off events, the three-year average (median) amount was used to calculate the cash flows.
|
 
|
On 7th February 2022, Tesla said it currently expects: to continue to generate net positive operating cash flow as it has done in the last four fiscal years; its capital expenditures to be between $5.00 to $7.00 billion in 2022 and each of the next two fiscal years; and its ability to be self-funding to continue as long as macroeconomic factors support current trends in its sales. Accordingly, based on forward looking statements, it appears that the company is in stage two of the business lifecycle  (i.e. the 'growth' stage), and, therefore, it has a total of three main stages of growth remaining.
|
|-
|
|What proportion of the company lifecycle is represented by growth stage 1?
|
|30%
|
|Research suggests 30%.<ref name=":6">http://escml.umd.edu/Papers/ObsCPMT.pdf</ref>
|
|-
|
|What proportion of the company lifecycle is represented by growth stage 2?
|
|10%
|
|Research suggests 10%.<ref name=":6" />
|
|-
|
| What proportion of the company lifecycle is represented by growth stage 3?
|
|20%
|
| Research suggests 20%.<ref name=":6" />
|
|-
|
|What proportion of the company lifecycle is represented by growth stage 4?
|
|40%
|
|Research suggests 40%.<ref name=":6" />
|
|-
|
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 2</div>'''
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
| colspan="61" |<div style="text-align: center;">'''Other'''</div>
|Cost of goods sold as a proportion of revenue (%)
|79%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7">http://people.stern.nyu.edu/adamodar/pdfiles/papers/younggrowth.pdf</ref>, and the margin for its peers is 79%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|-
|-
|Employees
|Operating expenses as a proportion of revenue (%)
|NA
|15%
|70
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 15%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|268
|-
|252
|Tax rate (%)
|514
|11%
|899
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7" />, and the rate for its peers is 11%.
|1,417
|-
|2,914
|Depreciation and amortisation as a proportion of revenue (%)
|5,859
|7%
|10,161
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 7%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|13,058
|-
|17,782
|Fixed capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
|37,543
|10%
|48,817
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 10%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|48,016
|-
|70,757
|Working capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
|99,290
|15%
|127,855
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 15%.
|
|-
|
|Net borrowing ($000)
|
|Zero
|
|Stockhub suggests that for simplicity, the net borrowing figure is zero.
|
|-
|
|Interest amount ($000)
|
|Zero
|
|Stockhub suggests that for simplicity, the interest amount figure is zero.
|
|-
|
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 3</div>'''
|
|-
|
|Cost of goods sold as a proportion of revenue (%)
|
|62%
|
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 3)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 62%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|
|-
|
|Operating expenses as a proportion of revenue (%)
|
|13%
|
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 3)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 13%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|
|-
|
|Tax rate (%)
|
|14%
|
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 3)<ref name=":7" />, and the rate for its peers is 14%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|
|-
|
|Depreciation and amortisation as a proportion of revenue (%)
|
|4%
|
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 3)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 4%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|
|-
|
|Fixed capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
|
|3%
|
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 3)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 3%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|
|-
|
|Working capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
|
|10%
|
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 10%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|}
 
=== What are the assumptions used to estimate the financial forecasts? ===
 
{| class="wikitable"
|+Key inputs
!Description
!Value
!Commentary
|-
|-
| colspan="3" | <div style="text-align: center;">'''Revenue'''</div>
|Net borrowing ($000)
|Zero
|The Stockhub users suggest that for simplicity, the net borrowing figure is zero.
|-
|-
|What's the estimated current size of the total addressable market?
|Interest amount ($000)
|$2,975,000,000
|Zero
|Here, the total addressable market (TAM) is defined as the global automotive market, and based on a number of assumptions<ref group="Note" name="Note01" />, it is estimated that the size of the market as of today (30th May 2022), in terms of revenue, is $2.975 trillion.
|The Stockhub users suggest that for simplicity, the interest amount figure is zero.
 
 
If the TAM is defined as the global energy market, then research suggests that the estimated size of the market is $6.777 trillion.<ref name=":16">https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/sustainable/sites/bartlett/files/an_exploration_of_energy_cost_ranges_limits_and_adjustment_process.pdf</ref>
|-
|-
|What is the estimated company lifespan?
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 4</div>'''
|60 years
|Tesla employs around 110,000, making the company a large organisation (more than 10,000 employees), and research shows that the average lifespan of a large corporation is around 50 years.<ref>Stadler, Enduring Success, 3–5.</ref>
|-
|-
|What's the estimated annual growth rate of the total addressable market over the lifecycle of the company?
|Cost of goods sold as a proportion of revenue (%)
|3%
|99%
|Research shows that the growth rate of the global automotive market (i.e. the total addressable market) is similar to the growth rate of global gross domestic product<ref>http://www.robertpicard.net/files/econgrowthandadvertising.pdf</ref>, which has averaged (medium) around 3% per year in the last 20 years (2001 to 2022)<ref>https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/WLD/world/gdp-growth-rate</ref>.
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 99%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.  
|-
|-
|What's the estimated company peak market share?
|Operating expenses as a proportion of revenue (%)
|10%
|15%
|The Stockhub users estimate that especially given the leadership of the company, the peak market share of Tesla is around 10%, and, therefore, suggests using the share amount here. As of 31st December 2021, Tesla's current share of the market is estimated at around 1.8%.
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 15%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|-
|-
|Which distribution function do you want to use to estimate company revenue?
|Tax rate (%)
|Gaussian
|0%
|Research suggests that the revenue pattern of companies is similar to the pattern produced by the Gaussian distribution function  (i.e. the revenue distribution is bell shaped)<ref>http://escml.umd.edu/Papers/ObsCPMT.pdf</ref>, so the Stockhub users suggest using that function here.
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the rate for its peers is 0%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|-
|-
|What's the estimated standard deviation of company revenue?
|Depreciation and amortisation as a proportion of revenue (%)
| 6 years
|37%
|Another way of asking this question is this way: within how many years either side of the mean does 68% of revenue occur? Based on Tesla's current revenue amount (i.e. $54 billion) and Tesla's estimated lifespan (i.e. 60 years) and Tesla's estimated current stage of its lifecycle (i.e. growth stage), the Stockhub users suggest using 6 years (i.e. 68% of all sales happen within 6 years either side of the mean year), so that's what's used here.
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 37%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|-
|-
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stages</div>'''
|Fixed capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
| 1%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 1%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|-
|-
|How many main stages of growth is the company expected to go through?
|Working capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
| 4 stages
| 10%
|Research suggests that a company typically goes through four distinct stages of cash flow growth.<ref>Levie J, Lichtenstein BB (2010) A terminal assessment of stages theory: Introducing a dynamic approach to entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 34(2): 317–350. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00377.x</nowiki></ref> Research also shows that incorporating those stages into the discounted cash flow model improves the quality of the model and, ultimately, the quality of the value estimation.<ref>Stef Hinfelaar et al.:, 2019.</ref>
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 10%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|-
|Net borrowing ($000)
|Zero
|The Stockhub users suggest that for simplicity, the net borrowing figure is zero.
|-
|Interest amount ($000)
|Zero
|The Stockhub users suggest that for simplicity, the interest amount figure is zero.
|}
 
==Risks==
 
As with any investment, investing in Tesla carries a level of risk. Overall, based on the key risks highlighted below, the degree of risk associated with an investment in Tesla is high.


In addition, research shows that a key way to determine the stage which a company is in is by examining the cash flow patterns of the company.<ref>Dickinson, 2010.</ref> A summary of the economic links to cash flow patterns can be found in the appendix of this report. The Stockhub users estimate that with Tesla's operating cash flows positive (+), investing cash flows negative (-) and its financing cash flows positive (+), the company is in the second stage of growth (i.e. the 'growth' stage), and, therefore, it has a total of three main stages of growth. Note, to account for one-off events, the three-year average (median) amount was used to calculate the cash flows.
===Risks related to the ability to grow the business===


On 7th February 2022, Tesla said it currently expects: to continue to generate net positive operating cash flow as it has done in the last four fiscal years; its capital expenditures to be between $5.00 to $7.00 billion in 2022 and each of the next two fiscal years; and its ability to be self-funding to continue as long as macroeconomic factors support current trends in its sales. Accordingly, based on forward looking statements, it appears that the company is in stage two of the business lifecycle  (i.e. the 'growth' stage), and, therefore, it has a total of three main stages of growth remaining.
*Tesla may be impacted by macroeconomic conditions resulting from the global COVID-19 pandemic.
|-
*Tesla may experience delays in launching and ramping the production of its products and features, or Tesla may be unable to control its manufacturing costs.
|What proportion of the company lifecycle is represented by growth stage 1?
*Tesla may be unable to grow its global product sales, delivery and installation capabilities and its servicing and vehicle charging networks, or Tesla may be unable to accurately project and effectively manage its growth.
|30%
*Tesla's future growth and success is dependent upon consumers’ demand for electric vehicles and specifically its vehicles in an automotive industry that is generally competitive, cyclical and volatile.
|Research suggests 30%.<ref name=":6">http://escml.umd.edu/Papers/ObsCPMT.pdf</ref>
*Tesla's suppliers may fail to deliver components according to schedules, prices, quality and volumes that are acceptable to us, or Tesla may be unable to manage these components effectively.
|-
*Tesla may be unable to meet its projected construction timelines, costs and production ramps at new factories, or Tesla may experience difficulties in generating and maintaining demand for products manufactured there.
|What proportion of the company lifecycle is represented by growth stage 2?
* Tesla will need to maintain and significantly grow its access to battery cells, including through the development and manufacture of its own cells, and control its related costs.
|10%
*Tesla faces strong competition for its products and services from a growing list of established and new competitors.
|Research suggests 10%.<ref name=":6" />
 
|-
===Risks related to the company's operations===
| What proportion of the company lifecycle is represented by growth stage 3?
 
|20%
*Tesla may experience issues with lithium-ion cells or other components manufactured at Gigafactory Nevada and Gigafactory Shanghai, which may harm the production and profitability of its vehicle and energy storage products.
| Research suggests 20%.<ref name=":6" />
*Tesla faces risks associated with maintaining and expanding its international operations, including unfavourable and uncertain regulatory, political, economic, tax and labour conditions.
|-
*Tesla's business may suffer if its products or features contain defects, fail to perform as expected or take longer than expected to become fully functional.
|What proportion of the company lifecycle is represented by growth stage 4?
*Tesla may be required to defend or insure against product liability claims.
|40%
*Tesla will need to maintain public credibility and confidence in its long-term business prospects in order to succeed.
|Research suggests 40%.<ref name=":6" />
*Tesla may be unable to effectively grow, or manage the compliance, residual value, financing and credit risks related to, its various financing programs.
|-
*Tesla must manage ongoing obligations under its agreement with the Research Foundation for the State University of New York relating to its Gigafactory New York.
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 2</div>'''
*If Tesla is unable to attract, hire and retain key employees and qualified personnel, its ability to compete may be harmed.
|-
*Tesla is highly dependent on the services of Elon Musk, its Chief Executive Officer.
|Cost of goods sold as a proportion of revenue (%)
*Tesla's information technology systems or data, or those of its service providers or customers or users could be subject to cyber-attacks or other security incidents, which could result in data breaches, intellectual property theft, claims, litigation, regulatory investigations, significant liability, reputational damage and other adverse consequences.
|79%
*Any unauthorized control or manipulation of Tesla's products’ systems could result in loss of confidence in it and its products.
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7">http://people.stern.nyu.edu/adamodar/pdfiles/papers/younggrowth.pdf</ref>, and the margin for its peers is 79%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.  
*Tesla's business may be adversely affected by any disruptions caused by union activities.
|-
*Tesla may choose to or be compelled to undertake product recalls or take other similar actions.
|Operating expenses as a proportion of revenue (%)
*Tesla's current and future warranty reserves may be insufficient to cover future warranty claims.
|15%
*Tesla's insurance coverage strategy may not be adequate to protect it from all business risks.
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 15%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
*Tesla's debt agreements contain covenant restrictions that may limit its ability to operate its business.
|-
*Additional funds may not be available to Tesla when it needs or want them.
|Tax rate (%)
*Tesla may be negatively impacted by any early obsolescence of its manufacturing equipment.
|11%
*Tesla holds and may acquire digital assets that may be subject to volatile market prices, impairment and unique risks of loss.
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7" />, and the rate for its peers is 11%.
*There is no guarantee that Tesla will have sufficient cash flow from its business to pay its indebtedness or that it will not incur additional indebtedness.
|-
*Tesla is exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
|Depreciation and amortisation as a proportion of revenue (%)
*Tesla may need to defend itself against intellectual property infringement claims, which may be time-consuming and expensive.
|7%
*Increased scrutiny and changing expectations from stakeholders with respect to the company's ESG practices may result in additional costs or risks.
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 7%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
* Tesla's operations could be adversely affected by events outside of its control, such as natural disasters, wars or health epidemics.
|-
 
|Fixed capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
===Risks related to government laws and regulations=== 
|10%
 
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 10%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
* Demand for Tesla's products and services may be impacted by the status of government and economic incentives supporting the development and adoption of such products.
|-
*Tesla is subject to evolving laws and regulations that could impose substantial costs, legal prohibitions or unfavourable changes upon its operations or products.
|Working capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
*Any failure by Tesla to comply with a variety of United States and international privacy and consumer protection laws may harm the company.
|15%
*Tesla could be subject to liability, penalties and other restrictive sanctions and adverse consequences arising out of certain governmental investigations and proceedings.
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 15%.
*Tesla may face regulatory challenges to or limitations on its ability to sell vehicles directly.
|-
 
|Net borrowing ($000)
===Risks related to the ownership of the company's common stock===
|Zero
 
|Stockhub suggests that for simplicity, the net borrowing figure is zero.
*The trading price of Tesla's common stock is likely to continue to be volatile.
* Tesla's financial results may vary significantly from period to period due to fluctuations in its operating costs and other factors.
*Tesla may fail to meet its publicly announced guidance or other expectations about its business, which could cause its stock price to decline.
*Transactions relating to Tesla's convertible senior notes may dilute the ownership interest of existing stockholders, or may otherwise depress the price of its common stock.
*If Elon Musk were forced to sell shares of Tesla's common stock that he has pledged to secure certain personal loan obligations, such sales could cause its stock price to decline.
* Anti-takeover provisions contained in Tesla's governing documents, applicable laws and its convertible senior notes could impair a takeover attempt.
 
==Valuation==
 
===What's the expected return of an investment in the company?===
 
The Stockhub users estimate that the expected return of an investment in the company over the next five years is negative 24%. In other words, an £1,000 investment in the company is expected to return £760 in five years time. The assumptions used to estimate the return figure can be found in the table below.
 
Assuming that a suitable return level over five years is 10% per year and Tesla achieves its expected return level (of negative 24%), then an investment in the company is considered to be an 'unsuitable' one.
 
===What are the assumptions used to estimate the return?===
 
{| class="wikitable"
|+ Key inputs
!Description
!Value
!Commentary
|-
|-
|Interest amount ($000)
| Which valuation model do you want to use?
|Zero
|Discounted cash flow
|Stockhub suggests that for simplicity, the interest amount figure is zero.
| There are two main approaches to estimating the value of an investment:
# By calculating the present value of the investment's expected future cash flows (i.e. discounted cash flow valuation); and
#By comparing the investment to other similar investments (i.e. relative valuation).
 
Research suggests that in terms of estimating the expected return of an investment over a period of 12 months or more, the approach that is more accurate is the discounted cash flow approach<ref name=":5">Demirakos et al., 2010; Gleason et al., 2013</ref>; nevertheless, for completeness purposes, separately, the valuation of the company is also estimated using the relative valuation approach (the valuation based on the relative approach can be found in the appendix of this report). 
 
Tesla has never paid cash dividends, and on 7th February 2022, it said that it currently does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the free cash flow valuation method is recommended(rather than the dividend discount model).
|-
|Which financial forecasts to use?
| Stockhub
|The only available long-term forecasts (i.e. >15 years) are the ones that are supplied by the Stockhub users (the forecasts can be found in the financials section of this report), so the Stockhub users suggest using those.
|-
|-
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 3</div>'''
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 2</div>'''  
|-
|-
|Cost of goods sold as a proportion of revenue (%)  
|Discount rate (%)
|62%
| 15%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 3)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 62%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.  
|There are two key risk parameters for a firm that need to be estimated: its cost of equity and its cost of debt. A key way to estimate the cost of equity is by looking at the beta (or betas) of the company in question, the cost of debt from a measure of default risk (an actual or synthetic rating) and apply the market value weights for debt and equity to come up with the cost of capital.
|-
|-
|Operating expenses as a proportion of revenue (%)
|Probability of success (%)
|13%
| 90%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 3)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 13%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
| Research suggests that a suitable rate for a company in this growth stage (i.e. stage 2) is 90%.
 
|-
|-
|Tax rate (%)
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 3</div>'''
|14%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 3)<ref name=":7" />, and the rate for its peers is 14%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|-
|-
|Depreciation and amortisation as a proportion of revenue (%)  
|Discount rate (%)
|4%
| 10%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 3)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 4%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|There are two key risk parameters for a firm that need to be estimated: its cost of equity and its cost of debt. A key way to estimate the cost of equity is by looking at the beta (or betas) of the company in question, the cost of debt from a measure of default risk (an actual or synthetic rating) and apply the market value weights for debt and equity to come up with the cost of capital.
|-
|-
|Fixed capital as a proportion of revenue (%)  
|Probability of success (%)
|3%
|100%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 3)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 3%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|Research suggests that a suitable rate for a company in this growth stage (i.e. stage 3) is 100%.
 
|-
|-
|Working capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 4</div>'''
|10%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 10%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|-
|-
|Net borrowing ($000)
|Discount rate (%)
|Zero
| 10%
|The Stockhub users suggest that for simplicity, the net borrowing figure is zero.
|There are two key risk parameters for a firm that need to be estimated: its cost of equity and its cost of debt. A key way to estimate the cost of equity is by looking at the beta (or betas) of the company in question, the cost of debt from a measure of default risk (an actual or synthetic rating) and apply the market value weights for debt and equity to come up with the cost of capital.
|-
|-
|Interest amount ($000)
|Probability of success (%)
|Zero
| 100%
|The Stockhub users suggest that for simplicity, the interest amount figure is zero.
|Research suggests that a suitable rate for a company in this growth stage (i.e. stage 4) is 100%.
 
|-
|-
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 4</div>'''
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Other key inputs</div>'''
|-
|-
|Cost of goods sold as a proportion of revenue (%)
|What's the current value of the company?
|99%
|$950.54 billion
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 99%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.  
|As at 5th June 2022, the current value of the Tesla company is $950.54 billion.
|-
|-
|Operating expenses as a proportion of revenue (%)
|Which time period do you want to use to estimate the expected return?
|15%
| Between now and five years time
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 15%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|Research suggests that following a market crash, the average amount of time it takes for the price of a stock market to return to its pre-crash level (i.e. the recovery period) is at least three years.<ref>https://www.newyorkfed.org/mediabrary/media/medialibrary/media/research/staff_reports/research_papers/9809.pdf</ref> Accordingly, Stockhub suggests that to account for general market cyclicity, it's best to estimate the expected return of the company between now and five years time.
|}
 
===Sensitive analysis===
 
The main inputs that result in the greatest change in the expected return of the Tesla investment are, in order of importance (from highest to lowest): 
 
#The size of the total addressable market (the default size is $3.0 trillion);
#Tesla peak market share (the default share is 10%); and  
#The discount rate (the default time-weighted average rate is 10%).
 
The impact of a 50% change in those main inputs to the expected return of the Tesla investment is shown in the table below.
 
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|+Tesla investment expected return sensitive analysis
!Main input
!50% worse
!Unchanged
!50% better
|-
|-
|Tax rate (%)  
|The size of the total addressable market
|0%
|(18%)
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the rate for its peers is 0%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|(24%)
|(36%)
|-
|-
|Depreciation and amortisation as a proportion of revenue (%)  
|Tesla peak market share
|37%
|(30%)
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 37%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
| (24%)
| (12%)
|-
|-
|Fixed capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
|The discount rate
| 1%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 1%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|-
|Working capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
| 10%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 10%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|-
|Net borrowing ($000)
|Zero
|The Stockhub users suggest that for simplicity, the net borrowing figure is zero.
|-
|Interest amount ($000)
|Zero
|The Stockhub users suggest that for simplicity, the interest amount figure is zero.
|}


==Risks==
|(32%)
|(24%)
| (18%)


As with any investment, investing in Tesla carries a level of risk.  Overall, based on the Tesla's adjusted beta (i.e. 2.12), the degree of risk associated with an investment in Tesla is 'high'.
|}


Here, to estimate the adjusted beta, we used the iShares MSCI World ETF to represent the market portfolio; and in terms of the time period and frequency of observations, we used five years of monthly data (i.e. 60 observations in total), which is supported by a study and is the most common choice. The beta value in a future period has been found to be on average closer to the mean value of 1.0, and because valuation is forward-looking, it is logical to adjust the raw beta so it more accurately predicts a future beta. In addition, here, we have assumed that for an investment to be considered 'high' risk, it must have a beta value of 1.5 or more. Further information about the beta ratings can be found in the appendix section of this report.
==Appendix==


The key risks can be found below. For us, currently, the biggest risk to the valuation of the company relates to the strong competition for its products and services from a growing list of established and new competitors (i.e. competition risk).
=== Competition ===
 
==== Automotive ====
===Risks related to the ability to grow the business===  
{| class="wikitable"
 
|+Model S competition comparison
*Tesla may be impacted by macroeconomic conditions resulting from the global COVID-19 pandemic.
!Category
*Tesla may experience delays in launching and ramping the production of its products and features, or Tesla may be unable to control its manufacturing costs.
!Model S<ref name=":8">https://www.porsche.com/usa/models/taycan/taycan-models/taycan/</ref>
*Tesla may be unable to grow its global product sales, delivery and installation capabilities and its servicing and vehicle charging networks, or Tesla may be unable to accurately project and effectively manage its growth.
!Porsche Taycan<ref name=":8" />
*Tesla's future growth and success is dependent upon consumers’ demand for electric vehicles and specifically its vehicles in an automotive industry that is generally competitive, cyclical and volatile.
|-
*Tesla's suppliers may fail to deliver components according to schedules, prices, quality and volumes that are acceptable to us, or Tesla may be unable to manage these components effectively.
|Is the vehicle fully electric?
*Tesla may be unable to meet its projected construction timelines, costs and production ramps at new factories, or Tesla may experience difficulties in generating and maintaining demand for products manufactured there.
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
* Tesla will need to maintain and significantly grow its access to battery cells, including through the development and manufacture of its own cells, and control its related costs.
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
*Tesla faces strong competition for its products and services from a growing list of established and new competitors.
|-
 
|What's the top acceleration of the vehicle?
===Risks related to the company's operations===
| style="background: green; color: white;" |3.1 seconds
 
| style="background: red; color: white;" |5.1 seconds
*Tesla may experience issues with lithium-ion cells or other components manufactured at Gigafactory Nevada and Gigafactory Shanghai, which may harm the production and profitability of its vehicle and energy storage products.
|-
*Tesla faces risks associated with maintaining and expanding its international operations, including unfavourable and uncertain regulatory, political, economic, tax and labour conditions.
|What's the maximum distance range of the vehicle on a single battery charge?
*Tesla's business may suffer if its products or features contain defects, fail to perform as expected or take longer than expected to become fully functional.
| style="background: green; color: white;" |405 miles
*Tesla may be required to defend or insure against product liability claims.
| style="background: red; color: white;" |200 miles
*Tesla will need to maintain public credibility and confidence in its long-term business prospects in order to succeed.
|-
*Tesla may be unable to effectively grow, or manage the compliance, residual value, financing and credit risks related to, its various financing programs.
|What's the top speed of the vehicle?
*Tesla must manage ongoing obligations under its agreement with the Research Foundation for the State University of New York relating to its Gigafactory New York.
| style="background: green; color: white;" |155 miles per hour
*If Tesla is unable to attract, hire and retain key employees and qualified personnel, its ability to compete may be harmed.
| style="background: red; color: white;" |143 miles per hour
*Tesla is highly dependent on the services of Elon Musk, its Chief Executive Officer.
|-
*Tesla's information technology systems or data, or those of its service providers or customers or users could be subject to cyber-attacks or other security incidents, which could result in data breaches, intellectual property theft, claims, litigation, regulatory investigations, significant liability, reputational damage and other adverse consequences.
|Which design type is the vehicle?
*Any unauthorized control or manipulation of Tesla's products’ systems could result in loss of confidence in it and its products.
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Sedan (i.e. car)
*Tesla's business may be adversely affected by any disruptions caused by union activities.
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Sedan (i.e. car)
*Tesla may choose to or be compelled to undertake product recalls or take other similar actions.
|-
*Tesla's current and future warranty reserves may be insufficient to cover future warranty claims.
|What is the safety rating of the vehicle?
*Tesla's insurance coverage strategy may not be adequate to protect it from all business risks.
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 out of 5 stars
*Tesla's debt agreements contain covenant restrictions that may limit its ability to operate its business.
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 out of 5 stars
*Additional funds may not be available to Tesla when it needs or want them.
|-
*Tesla may be negatively impacted by any early obsolescence of its manufacturing equipment.
|How many seats does the vehicle have?
*Tesla holds and may acquire digital assets that may be subject to volatile market prices, impairment and unique risks of loss.
| style="background: green; color: white;" |5 seats
*There is no guarantee that Tesla will have sufficient cash flow from its business to pay its indebtedness or that it will not incur additional indebtedness.
| style="background: red; color: white;" |4 seats
*Tesla is exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
|-
*Tesla may need to defend itself against intellectual property infringement claims, which may be time-consuming and expensive.
|What's the cargo capacity of the vehicle?
*Increased scrutiny and changing expectations from stakeholders with respect to the company's ESG practices may result in additional costs or risks.
| style="background: green; color: white;" |28 cubic feet
* Tesla's operations could be adversely affected by events outside of its control, such as natural disasters, wars or health epidemics.
| style="background: red; color: white;" |17.2 cubic feet
|-
|Which drive wheel does the vehicle have?
| style="background: green; color: white;" |All-wheel drive
| style="background: red; color: white;" |Rear-wheel drive
|-
|What's the price of the vehicle?
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$99,990
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$86,700
|-
|What's the vehicle's price per cargo capacity?
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$3,571 per cubic feet
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$5,041 per cubic feet
|-
|What's the vehicle's price per seat?
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$19,998 per seat
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$21,675 per seat
|}


===Risks related to government laws and regulations=== 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|+Model 3 competition comparison
* Demand for Tesla's products and services may be impacted by the status of government and economic incentives supporting the development and adoption of such products.
!Category
*Tesla is subject to evolving laws and regulations that could impose substantial costs, legal prohibitions or unfavourable changes upon its operations or products.
!Model 3<ref>https://www.tesla.com/model3</ref>
*Any failure by Tesla to comply with a variety of United States and international privacy and consumer protection laws may harm the company.
!Mustang Mach-E<ref>https://www.ford.com/suvs/mach-e/?gnav=header-electrified-vhp</ref>
*Tesla could be subject to liability, penalties and other restrictive sanctions and adverse consequences arising out of certain governmental investigations and proceedings.
|-
*Tesla may face regulatory challenges to or limitations on its ability to sell vehicles directly.
|Is the vehicle fully electric?
 
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
===Risks related to the ownership of the company's common stock=== 
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
 
*The trading price of Tesla's common stock is likely to continue to be volatile.
* Tesla's financial results may vary significantly from period to period due to fluctuations in its operating costs and other factors.
*Tesla may fail to meet its publicly announced guidance or other expectations about its business, which could cause its stock price to decline.
*Transactions relating to Tesla's convertible senior notes may dilute the ownership interest of existing stockholders, or may otherwise depress the price of its common stock.
*If Elon Musk were forced to sell shares of Tesla's common stock that he has pledged to secure certain personal loan obligations, such sales could cause its stock price to decline.
* Anti-takeover provisions contained in Tesla's governing documents, applicable laws and its convertible senior notes could impair a takeover attempt.
 
==Valuation==
 
===What's the expected return of an investment in the company?===
 
The Stockhub users estimate that the expected return of an investment in the company over the next five years is negative 24%. In other words, an £1,000 investment in the company is expected to return £760 in five years time. The assumptions used to estimate the return figure can be found in the table below.
 
Assuming that a suitable return level over five years is 10% per year and Tesla achieves its expected return level (of negative 24%), then an investment in the company is considered to be an 'unsuitable' one.
 
===What are the assumptions used to estimate the return?===
 
{| class="wikitable"
|+ Key inputs
!Description
!Value
!Commentary
|-
|-
| Which valuation model do you want to use?
|What's the top acceleration of the vehicle?
|Discounted cash flow
| style="background: red; color: white;" |5.8 seconds
| There are two main approaches to estimate the value of an investment:  
| style="background: green; color: white;" |5.2 seconds
# By calculating the present value of the investment's expected future cash flows (i.e. discounted cash flow valuation); and
#By comparing the investment to other similar investments (i.e. relative valuation).
 
Research suggests that in terms of estimating the expected return of an investment over a period of 12-months or more, the approach that is more accurate is the discounted cash flow approach<ref name=":5">Demirakos et al., 2010; Gleason et al., 2013</ref>, so that's the approach that he Stockhub users suggest to use here; nevertheless, for completeness purposes, separately, the valuation of the company is also estimated using the using the relative valuation approach (the valuation based on the relative approach can be found in the appendix of this report). 
 
Tesla has never paid cash dividends, and on 7th February 2022, it said that it currently does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the Stockhub users suggest using the free cash flow valuation method (rather than the dividend discount model).  
|-
|-
|Which financial forecasts to use?
|What's the maximum distance range of the vehicle on a single battery charge?
| Stockhub
| style="background: green; color: white;" |272 miles
|The only available long-term forecasts (i.e. >15 years) are the ones that are supplied by the Stockhub users (the forecasts can be found in the financials section of this report), so the Stockhub users suggest using those.
| style="background: red; color: white;" |247 miles
|-
|-
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 2</div>'''
|What's the top speed of the vehicle?
| style="background: green; color: white;" |140 miles per hour
| style="background: red; color: white;" |124 miles per hour
|-
|-
|Discount rate (%)
|Which design type is the vehicle?
| 15%
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Sedan (i.e. car)
|There are two key risk parameters for a firm that need to be estimated: its cost of equity and its cost of debt. A key way to estimate the cost of equity is by looking at the beta (or betas) of the company in question, the cost of debt from a measure of default risk (an actual or synthetic rating) and apply the market value weights for debt and equity to come up with the cost of capital.
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |SUV (i.e. car)
|-
|-
|Probability of success (%)
|What is the safety rating of the vehicle?
| 90%
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 out of 5 stars
| Research suggests that a suitable rate for a company in this growth stage (i.e. stage 2) is 90%.
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 out of 5 stars
 
|-
|-
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 3</div>'''
|How many seats does the vehicle have?
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 seats
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 seats
|-
|-
|Discount rate (%)
|What's the cargo capacity of the vehicle?
| 10%
| style="background: red; color: white;" |23 cubic feet
|There are two key risk parameters for a firm that need to be estimated: its cost of equity and its cost of debt. A key way to estimate the cost of equity is by looking at the beta (or betas) of the company in question, the cost of debt from a measure of default risk (an actual or synthetic rating) and apply the market value weights for debt and equity to come up with the cost of capital.
| style="background: green; color: white;" |59.7 cubic feet
|-
|-
|Probability of success (%)
|Which drive wheel does the vehicle have?
|100%
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Rear-wheel drive
|Research suggests that a suitable rate for a company in this growth stage (i.e. stage 3) is 100%.
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Rear-wheel drive
 
|-
|-
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 4</div>'''
|What's the price of the vehicle?
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$46,990
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$43,895
|-
|-
|Discount rate (%)
|What's the vehicle's price per cargo capacity?
| 10%
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$2,043 per cubic feet
|There are two key risk parameters for a firm that need to be estimated: its cost of equity and its cost of debt. A key way to estimate the cost of equity is by looking at the beta (or betas) of the company in question, the cost of debt from a measure of default risk (an actual or synthetic rating) and apply the market value weights for debt and equity to come up with the cost of capital.
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$735 per cubic feet
|-
|-
|Probability of success (%)
|What's the vehicle's price per seat?
| 100%
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$9,398 per seat
|Research suggests that a suitable rate for a company in this growth stage (i.e. stage 4) is 100%.
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$8,779 per seat
|}


{| class="wikitable"
|+Model X competition comparison
!Category
!Model X<ref name=":13" />
!Audi e-tron<ref>https://www.audiusa.com/us/web/en/models/e-tron/e-tron/2022/overview.html#2022-Audi-e-tron%C2%AE</ref>
|-
|-
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Other key inputs</div>'''
|Is the vehicle fully electric?
|-
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
|What's the current value of the company?
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
|$950.54 billion
|As at 5th June 2022, the current value of the Tesla company is $950.54 billion.
|-
|-
|Which time period do you want to use to estimate the expected return?
|What's the top acceleration of the vehicle?
| Between now and five years time
| style="background: green; color: white;" |3.8 seconds
|Research suggests that following a market crash, the average amount of time it takes for the price of a stock market to return to its pre-crash level (i.e. the recovery period) is at least three years.<ref>https://www.newyorkfed.org/mediabrary/media/medialibrary/media/research/staff_reports/research_papers/9809.pdf</ref> Accordingly, Stockhub suggests that to account for general market cyclicity, it's best to estimate the expected return of the company between now and five years time.
| style="background: red; color: white;" |5.5 seconds
|}
 
===Sensitive analysis===
 
The main inputs that result in the greatest change in the expected return of the Tesla investment are, in order of importance (from highest to lowest):  
 
#The size of the total addressable market (the default size is $3.0 trillion);
#Tesla peak market share (the default share is 10%); and
#The discount rate (the default time-weighted average rate is 10%).
 
The impact of a 50% change in those main inputs to the expected return of the Tesla investment is shown in the table below.
 
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|+Tesla investment expected return sensitive analysis
!Main input
!50% worse
!Unchanged
!50% better
|-
|-
|The size of the total addressable market
|What's the maximum distance range of the vehicle on a single battery charge?
|N/A
| style="background: green; color: white;" |348 miles
|(24%)
| style="background: red; color: white;" |222 miles
|N/A
|-
|-
|Tesla peak market share
|What's the top speed of the vehicle?
|N/A
| style="background: green; color: white;" |155 miles per hour
| (24%)
| style="background: red; color: white;" |124 miles per hour
| N/A
|-
|-
|The discount rate
|Which design type is the vehicle?
 
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |SUV (i.e. car)
|N/A
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |SUV (i.e. car)
|(24%)
| N/A
 
|}
 
==Appendix==
 
=== Competition ===
==== Automotive ====
{| class="wikitable"
|+Model S competition comparison
!Category
!Model S<ref name=":8">https://www.porsche.com/usa/models/taycan/taycan-models/taycan/</ref>
!Porsche Taycan<ref name=":8" />
|-
|-
|Is the vehicle fully electric?
|What is the safety rating of the vehicle?
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 out of 5 stars
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 out of 5 stars
|-
|What's the top acceleration of the vehicle?
| style="background: green; color: white;" |3.1 seconds
| style="background: red; color: white;" |5.1 seconds
|-
|What's the maximum distance range of the vehicle on a single battery charge?
| style="background: green; color: white;" |405 miles
| style="background: red; color: white;" |200 miles
|-
|What's the top speed of the vehicle?
| style="background: green; color: white;" |155 miles per hour
| style="background: red; color: white;" |143 miles per hour
|-
|Which design type is the vehicle?
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Sedan (i.e. car)
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Sedan (i.e. car)
|-
|What is the safety rating of the vehicle?
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 out of 5 stars
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 out of 5 stars
|-
|-
|How many seats does the vehicle have?
|How many seats does the vehicle have?
| style="background: green; color: white;" |5 seats
| style="background: green; color: white;" |7 seats
| style="background: red; color: white;" |4 seats
| style="background: red; color: white;" |5 seats
|-
|-
|What's the cargo capacity of the vehicle?
|What's the cargo capacity of the vehicle?
| style="background: green; color: white;" |28 cubic feet
| style="background: green; color: white;" |88 cubic feet
| style="background: red; color: white;" |17.2 cubic feet
| style="background: red; color: white;" |56 cubic feet
|-
|-
|Which drive wheel does the vehicle have?  
|Which drive wheel does the vehicle have?  
| style="background: green; color: white;" |All-wheel drive
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |All-wheel drive
| style="background: red; color: white;" |Rear-wheel drive
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |All-wheel drive
|-
|-
|What's the price of the vehicle?
|What's the price of the vehicle?
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$99,990
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$114,990
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$86,700
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$65,900
|-
|-
|What's the vehicle's price per cargo capacity?
|What's the vehicle's price per cargo capacity?
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$3,571 per cubic feet
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$1,307 per cubic feet
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$5,041 per cubic feet
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$1,168 per cubic feet
|-
|-
|What's the vehicle's price per seat?
|What's the vehicle's price per seat?
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$19,998 per seat
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$16,427 per seat
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$21,675 per seat
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$13,180 per seat
|}
|}


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+Model 3 competition comparison
|+Model Y competition comparison
!Category
!Category
!Model 3<ref>https://www.tesla.com/model3</ref>
!Model Y<ref name=":13" />
!Mustang Mach-E<ref>https://www.ford.com/suvs/mach-e/?gnav=header-electrified-vhp</ref>
!Volkswagen ID.4
|-
|-
|Is the vehicle fully electric?
|Is the vehicle fully electric?
Line 1,556: Line 1,482:
|-
|-
|What's the top acceleration of the vehicle?
|What's the top acceleration of the vehicle?
| style="background: red; color: white;" |5.8 seconds
| style="background: green; color: white;" |4.8 seconds
| style="background: green; color: white;" |5.2 seconds
| style="background: red; color: white;" |8.5 seconds
|-
|-
|What's the maximum distance range of the vehicle on a single battery charge?
|What's the maximum distance range of the vehicle on a single battery charge?
| style="background: green; color: white;" |272 miles
| style="background: green; color: white;" |330 miles
| style="background: red; color: white;" |247 miles
| style="background: red; color: white;" |275 miles
|-
|-
|What's the top speed of the vehicle?
|What's the top speed of the vehicle?
| style="background: green; color: white;" |140 miles per hour
| style="background: green; color: white;" |135 miles per hour
| style="background: red; color: white;" |124 miles per hour
| style="background: red; color: white;" |100 miles per hour
|-
|-
|Which design type is the vehicle?
|Which design type is the vehicle?
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Sedan (i.e. car)
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |SUV (i.e. car)
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |SUV (i.e. car)
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |SUV (i.e. car)
|-
|-
Line 1,576: Line 1,502:
|-
|-
|How many seats does the vehicle have?
|How many seats does the vehicle have?
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 seats
| style="background: green; color: white;" |7 seats
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 seats
| style="background: red; color: white;" |5 seats
|-
|-
|What's the cargo capacity of the vehicle?
|What's the cargo capacity of the vehicle?
| style="background: red; color: white;" |23 cubic feet
| style="background: green; color: white;" |76 cubic feet
| style="background: green; color: white;" |59.7 cubic feet
| style="background: red; color: white;" |55.6 cubic feet
|-
|-
|Which drive wheel does the vehicle have?  
|Which drive wheel does the vehicle have?  
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Rear-wheel drive
| style="background: green; color: white;" |All-wheel drive
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Rear-wheel drive
| style="background: red; color: white;" |Rear-wheel drive
|-
|-
|What's the price of the vehicle?
|What's the price of the vehicle?
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$46,990
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$62,990
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$43,895
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$41,230
|-
|-
|What's the vehicle's price per cargo capacity?
|What's the vehicle's price per cargo capacity?
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$2,043 per cubic feet
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$829 per cubic feet
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$735 per cubic feet
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$742 per cubic feat
|-
|-
|What's the vehicle's price per seat?
|What's the vehicle's price per seat?
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$9,398 per seat
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$8,999 per seat
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$8,779 per seat
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$8,248 per seat
|}
|}
==== Energy generation and storage ====


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+Model X competition comparison
|+All Tesla energy storage competition comparison
!Category
|-
!Model X<ref name=":13" />
! !!Powerwall!!'''Megapack'''
!Audi e-tron<ref>https://www.audiusa.com/us/web/en/models/e-tron/e-tron/2022/overview.html#2022-Audi-e-tron%C2%AE</ref>
|-
|-
|Is the vehicle fully electric?
|Is the source of energy solar?||style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes||style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
|-
|-
|What's the top acceleration of the vehicle?
|Is it designed for houses (i.e. smaller electricity demand)?||style="background: green; color: white;" |Yes||style="background: red; color: white;" |No
| style="background: green; color: white;" |3.8 seconds
| style="background: red; color: white;" |5.5 seconds
|-
|-
|What's the maximum distance range of the vehicle on a single battery charge?
|Is it designed for commercial buildings (i.e. greater electricity demand)?||style="background: red; color: white;" |No|| style="background: green; color: white;" |Yes
| style="background: green; color: white;" |348 miles
| style="background: red; color: white;" |222 miles
|-
|-
|What's the top speed of the vehicle?
|What's the energy capacity of the product?
| style="background: green; color: white;" |155 miles per hour
|style="background: red; color: white;" |13.5 kilowatt hour
| style="background: red; color: white;" |124 miles per hour
|style="background: green; color: white;" |3.5 megawatt hour
|-
|-
|Which design type is the vehicle?
|What’s the power of the product?
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |SUV (i.e. car)
|style="background: red; color: white;" |5 kilowatts
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |SUV (i.e. car)
|style="background: green; color: white;" |1.54 megawatts
|-
|-
|What is the safety rating of the vehicle?
|How long does it take to charge the battery if there’s sufficient solar energy?
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 out of 5 stars
|style="background: red; color: white;" |2.7 hours
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 out of 5 stars
|style="background: green; color: white;" |2.3 hours
|-
|-
|How many seats does the vehicle have?
|What's the price of the product?
| style="background: green; color: white;" |7 seats
|style="background: green; color: white;" |$10,500
| style="background: red; color: white;" |5 seats
|style="background: red; color: white;" |$1,000,000
|-
|-
|What's the cargo capacity of the vehicle?
|What's the price per energy capacity?
| style="background: green; color: white;" |88 cubic feet
|style="background: red; color: white;" |$593 per kilowatt hour
| style="background: red; color: white;" |56 cubic feet
|style="background: green; color: white;" |$286 per kilowatt hour
|}
Note: 1 megawatt is equivalent to 1,000 kilowatts.
{| class="wikitable"
|+Powerwall competition comparison
!What's the name of the product?
!Powerwall
!LG Chem
!SonnenCore
|-
|-
|Which drive wheel does the vehicle have?  
|Is the source of energy solar?
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |All-wheel drive
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |All-wheel drive
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
|-
|-
|What's the price of the vehicle?
|What's the energy capacity of the product?
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$114,990
|style="background: green; color: white;" |13.5 kilowatt hour
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$65,900
|style="background: red; color: white;" |9.3 kilowatt hour
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |10 kilowatt hour
|-
|-
|What's the vehicle's price per cargo capacity?
|What's the price of the product?
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$1,307 per cubic feet
|style="background: red; color: white;" |$10,500
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$1,168 per cubic feet
|style="background: green; color: white;" |$7,000
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$9,500
|-
|-
|What's the vehicle's price per seat?
|What's the price per energy capacity?
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$16,427 per seat
|style="background: green; color: white;" |$593 per kilowatt hour
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$13,180 per seat
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$753 per kilowatt hour
|style="background: red; color: white;" |$950 per kilowatt hour
|}
|}


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+Model Y competition comparison
|+Solar Roof competition comparison
!Category
!Model Y<ref name=":13" />
!Volkswagen ID.4
|-
|-
|Is the vehicle fully electric?
! !!Solar Roof!!Traditional roof tile
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
!Other solar-energy generation roof tile
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
|-
|-
|What's the top acceleration of the vehicle?
|Does it generate electricity?|| style="background: green; color: white;" |Yes|| style="background: red; color: white;" |No
| style="background: green; color: white;" |4.8 seconds
| style="background: green; color: white;" |Yes
| style="background: red; color: white;" |8.5 seconds
|-
|-
|What's the maximum distance range of the vehicle on a single battery charge?
|Is it aesthetically beautiful?|| style="background: green; color: white;" |Yes|| style="background: green; color: white;" |Yes
| style="background: green; color: white;" |330 miles
| style="background: red; color: white;" |No
| style="background: red; color: white;" |275 miles
|}
 
=== Financial statements ===
{| class="wikitable"
|+Balance sheet
!Year end date
!31/12/2022
!31/12/2021
!31/12/2020
!31/12/2019
!31/12/2018
|-
|-
|What's the top speed of the vehicle?
|'''Current Assets'''
| style="background: green; color: white;" |135 miles per hour
|
| style="background: red; color: white;" |100 miles per hour
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Which design type is the vehicle?
|Cash and Cash Equivalents ($million)
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |SUV (i.e. car)
|$16,253
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |SUV (i.e. car)
|$17,576
|$19,384
|$6,268
|$3,879
|-
|-
|What is the safety rating of the vehicle?
|Short-Term Investments ($million)
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 out of 5 stars
|$5,932
| style="background: orange; color: white;" |5 out of 5 stars
|$131
| --
| --
| --
|-
|-
|How many seats does the vehicle have?
|Net Receivables ($million)
| style="background: green; color: white;" |7 seats
|$2,952
| style="background: red; color: white;" |5 seats
|$1,913
|$1,886
|$1,324
|$949
|-
|-
|What's the cargo capacity of the vehicle?
|Inventory ($million)
| style="background: green; color: white;" |76 cubic feet
|$12,839
| style="background: red; color: white;" |55.6 cubic feet
|$5,757
|$4,101
|$3,552
|$3,113
|-
|-
|Which drive wheel does the vehicle have?
|Other Current Assets ($million)
| style="background: green; color: white;" |All-wheel drive
|$2,941
| style="background: red; color: white;" |Rear-wheel drive
|$1,723
|$1,346
|$959
|$366
|-
|-
|What's the price of the vehicle?
|Total Current Assets ($million)
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$62,990
|$40,917
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$41,230
|$27,100
|$26,717
|$12,103
|$8,307
|-
|-
|What's the vehicle's price per cargo capacity?
|'''Long-Term Assets'''
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$829 per cubic feet
|
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$742 per cubic feat
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|What's the vehicle's price per seat?
|Long-Term Investments ($million)
| style="background: red; color: white;" |$8,999 per seat
| --
| style="background: green; color: white;" |$8,248 per seat
| --
|}
| --
 
| --
==== Energy generation and storage ====
|$422
 
{| class="wikitable"
|+All Tesla energy storage competition comparison
|-
|-
! !!Powerwall!!'''Megapack'''
|Fixed Assets ($million)
|$31,146
|$25,411
|$17,396
|$14,061
|$13,420
|-
|-
|Is the source of energy solar?||style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes||style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
|Goodwill ($million)
|-
|$194
|Is it designed for houses (i.e. smaller electricity demand)?||style="background: green; color: white;" |Yes||style="background: red; color: white;" |No
|$200
|$207
|$198
|$68
|-
|-
|Is it designed for commercial buildings (i.e. greater electricity demand)?||style="background: red; color: white;" |No|| style="background: green; color: white;" |Yes
|Intangible Assets ($million)
|$215
|$257
|$313
|$339
|$282
|-
|-
|What's the energy capacity of the product?
|Other Assets ($million)
|style="background: red; color: white;" |13.5 kilowatt hour
|$9,866
|style="background: green; color: white;" |3.5 megawatt hour
|$9,163
|$7,515
|$7,608
|$7,241
|-
|-
|What’s the power of the product?
|Deferred Asset Charges ($million)
|style="background: red; color: white;" |5 kilowatts
| --
|style="background: green; color: white;" |1.54 megawatts
| --
| --
| --
| --
|-
|-
|How long does it take to charge the battery if there’s sufficient solar energy?
|Total Assets ($million)
|style="background: red; color: white;" |2.7 hours
|$82,338
|style="background: green; color: white;" |2.3 hours
|$62,131
|$52,148
|$34,309
|$29,740
|-
|-
|What's the price of the product?
|'''Current Liabilities'''
|style="background: green; color: white;" |$10,500
|
|style="background: red; color: white;" |$1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|What's the price per energy capacity?
|Accounts Payable ($million)
|style="background: red; color: white;" |$593 per kilowatt hour
|$22,397
|style="background: green; color: white;" |$286 per kilowatt hour
|$15,744
|}
|$9,906
Note: 1 megawatt is equivalent to 1,000 kilowatts.
|$6,993
{| class="wikitable"
|$5,499
|+Powerwall competition comparison
!What's the name of the product?
!Powerwall
!LG Chem
!SonnenCore
|-
|-
|Is the source of energy solar?
|Short-Term Debt / Current Portion of Long-Term Debt ($million)
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
|$1,502
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
|$1,589
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |Yes
|$2,132
|$1,785
|$2,568
|-
|Other Current Liabilities ($million)
|$2,810
|$2,372
|$2,210
|$1,889
|$1,926
|-
|-
|What's the energy capacity of the product?
|Total Current Liabilities ($million)
|style="background: green; color: white;" |13.5 kilowatt hour
|$26,709
|style="background: red; color: white;" |9.3 kilowatt hour
|$19,705
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |10 kilowatt hour
|$14,248
|$10,667
|$9,993
|-
|-
|What's the price of the product?
|Long-Term Debt ($million)
|style="background: red; color: white;" |$10,500
|$1,597
|style="background: green; color: white;" |$7,000
|$5,245
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$9,500
|$9,556
|$11,634
|$9,404
|-
|-
|What's the price per energy capacity?
|Other Liabilities ($million)
|style="background: green; color: white;" |$593 per kilowatt hour
|$5,330
|style="background: orange; color: white;" |$753 per kilowatt hour
|$3,546
|style="background: red; color: white;" |$950 per kilowatt hour
|$3,330
|}
|$2,691
 
|$3,039
{| class="wikitable"
|+Solar Roof competition comparison
|-
|-
! !!Solar Roof!!Traditional roof tile
|Deferred Liability Charges ($million)
!Other solar-energy generation roof tile
|$2,804
|$2,052
|$1,284
|$1,207
|$991
|-
|-
|Does it generate electricity?|| style="background: green; color: white;" |Yes|| style="background: red; color: white;" |No
|Misc. Stocks ($million)
| style="background: green; color: white;" |Yes
|$785
|$826
|$850
|$849
|$834
|-
|-
|Is it aesthetically beautiful?|| style="background: green; color: white;" |Yes|| style="background: green; color: white;" |Yes
|Minority Interest ($million)
| style="background: red; color: white;" |No
|$409
|}
|$568
 
|$655
=== Financial statements ===
|$643
{| class="wikitable"
|$556
|+Balance sheet
|-
!Year end date
|Total Liabilities ($million)
!31/12/2021
|$37,634
!31/12/2020
|$31,374
!31/12/2019
|$29,268
!31/12/2018
|$27,048
|$24,261
|-
|-
|'''Current Assets'''
|'''Stock Holders Equity'''  
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,800: Line 1,800:
|
|
|-
|-
|Cash and Cash Equivalents ($million)
|Common Stocks ($million)
|$17,576
|$1
|$19,384
|$1
|$6,268
|$1
|$3,879
|$1
|-
|Short-Term Investments ($million)
|$131
| --
| --
| --
| --
|-
|-
|Net Receivables ($million)
|Capital Surplus ($million)
|$1,913
|$12,887
|$1,886
|$331
|$1,324
| style="color: red;" |-$5,399
|$949
| style="color: red;" |-$6,083
| style="color: red;" |-$5,318
|-
|-
|Inventory ($million)
|Retained Earnings
|$5,757
| ---
|$4,101
| --
|$3,552
|$3,113
|-
|Other Current Assets ($million)
|$1,723
|$1,346
|$959
|$366
|-
|Total Current Assets ($million)
|$27,100
|$26,717
|$12,103
|$8,307
|-
|'''Long-Term Assets'''
|
|
|
|
|-
|Long-Term Investments ($million)
| --
| --
| --
| --
| --
| --
|$422
|-
|-
|Fixed Assets ($million)
|Treasury Stock ($million)
|$25,411
|$32,177
|$17,396
|$29,803
|$14,061
|$27,260
|$13,420
|$12,736
|$10,249
|-
|-
|Goodwill ($million)
|Other Equity ($million)
|$200
| -$361
|$207
|$54
|$198
|$363
|$68
| style="color: red;" |-$36
| style="color: red;" |-$8
|-
|-
|Intangible Assets ($million)
|Total Equity ($million)
|$257
|$44,704
|$313
|$30,189
|$339
|$22,225
|$282
|$6,618
|$4,923
|-
|-
|Other Assets ($million)
|Total Liabilities & Equity ($million)
|$9,163
|$82,338
|$7,515
|$7,608
|$7,241
|-
|Deferred Asset Charges ($million)
| --
| --
| --
| --
|-
|Total Assets ($million)
|$62,131
|$62,131
|$52,148
|$52,148
|$34,309
|$34,309
|$29,740
|$29,740
|}
{| class="wikitable"
|+Cash flow
!Year end date
!31/12/2022
!31/12/2021
!31/12/2020
!31/12/2019
!31/12/2018
|-
|Net Income ($million)
|$12,587
|$5,519
|$721
| style="color: red;" |-$862
| style="color: red;" |-$976
|-
|-
|'''Current Liabilities'''
|'''Cash Flows-Operating Activities'''
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,890: Line 1,873:
|
|
|-
|-
|Accounts Payable ($million)
|Depreciation ($million)
|$15,744
|$3,747
|$9,906
|$2,911
|$6,993
|$2,322
|$5,499
|$2,154
|$2,060
|-
|-
|Short-Term Debt / Current Portion of Long-Term Debt ($million)
|Net Income Adjustments ($million)
|$1,589
|?
|$2,132
|$2,424
|$1,785
| $2,575
|$2,568
| $1,375
| $1,043
|-
|-
|Other Current Liabilities ($million)
|'''Changes in Operating Activities'''
|$2,372
|
|$2,210
|
|$1,889
|
|$1,926
|
|
|-
|-
|Total Current Liabilities ($million)
|Accounts Receivable ($million)
|$19,705
| -$1,124
|$14,248
| style="color: red;" |-$130
|$10,667
| style="color: red;" |-$652
|$9,993
| style="color: red;" |-$367
| style="color: red;" |-$497
|-
|-
|Long-Term Debt ($million)
|Changes in Inventories ($million)
|$5,245
| -$6,465
|$9,556
| style="color: red;" |-$1,709
|$11,634
| style="color: red;" |-$422
|$9,404
| style="color: red;" |-$429
| style="color: red;" |-$1,023
|-
|-
|Other Liabilities ($million)
|Other Operating Activities ($million)
|$3,546
|?
|$3,330
| style="color: red;" |-$3,676
|$2,691
| style="color: red;" |-$1,667
|$3,039
| style="color: red;" |-$937
| style="color: red;" |-$504
|-
|-
|Deferred Liability Charges ($million)
|Liabilities ($million)
|$2,052
|?
|$1,284
|$6,033
|$1,207
|$2,925
|$991
|$1,384
|$2,082
|-
|-
|Misc. Stocks ($million)
|Net Cash Flow-Operating ($million)
|$826
|$14,724
|$850
| $11,497
|$849
| $5,943
|$834
| $2,405
|$2,098
|-
|-
|Minority Interest ($million)
|'''Cash Flows-Investing Activities'''
|$568
|
|$655
|$643
|$556
|-
|Total Liabilities ($million)
|$31,374
|$29,268
|$27,048
|$24,261
|-
|'''Stock Holders Equity'''  
|
|
|
|
Line 1,956: Line 1,936:
|
|
|-
|-
|Common Stocks ($million)
|Capital Expenditures ($million)
|$1
|$7,163
|$1
| style="color: red;" |-$6,514
|$1
| style="color: red;" |-$3,232
| --
| style="color: red;" |-$1,432
| style="color: red;" |-$2,319
|-
|-
|Capital Surplus ($million)
|Investments ($million)
|$331
| -$5,835
| style="color: red;" |-$5,399
| style="color: red;" |-$132
| style="color: red;" |-$6,083
| style="color: red;" |-$5,318
|-
|Retained Earnings
| --
| --
| --
| --
| --
| --
| --
|-
|-
|Treasury Stock ($million)
|Other Investing Activities ($million)
|$29,803
|$1012
|$27,260
| style="color: red;" |-$1,222
|$12,736
|$100
|$10,249
| style="color: red;" |-$4
| style="color: red;" |-$18
|-
|-
|Other Equity ($million)
|Net Cash Flows-Investing ($million)
|$54
| -$11,973
|$363
| style="color: red;" |-$7,868
| style="color: red;" |-$36
| style="color: red;" |-$3,132
| style="color: red;" |-$8
| style="color: red;" |-$1,436
| style="color: red;" |-$2,337
|-
|-
|Total Equity ($million)
|'''Cash Flows-Financing Activities'''
|$30,189
|
|$22,225
|$6,618
|$4,923
|-
|Total Liabilities & Equity ($million)
|$62,131
|$52,148
|$34,309
|$29,740
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
|+Cash flow
!Year end date
!31/12/2021
!31/12/2020
!31/12/2019
!31/12/2018
|-
|Net Income ($million)
|$5,519
|$721
| style="color: red;" |-$862
| style="color: red;" |-$976
|-
|'''Cash Flows-Operating Activities'''
|
|
|
|
Line 2,019: Line 1,971:
|
|
|-
|-
|Depreciation ($million)
|Sale and Purchase of Stock ($million)
|$2,911
| --
|$2,322
|$699
|$2,154
|$12,675
|$2,060
|$1,555
|$727
|-
|-
|Net Income Adjustments ($million)
|Net Borrowings ($million)
|$2,424
| --
| $2,575
| style="color: red;" |-$5,732
| $1,375
| style="color: red;" |-$2,488
| $1,043
|$798
|$89
|-
|-
|'''Changes in Operating Activities'''
|Other Financing Activities ($million)
|
|
|
|
|
| --
| --
| --
| --
|-
|-
|Accounts Receivable ($million)
|Net Cash Flows-Financing ($million)
| style="color: red;" |-$130
| -$3,527
| style="color: red;" |-$652
| style="color: red;" |-$5,203
| style="color: red;" |-$367
|$9,973
| style="color: red;" |-$497
|$1,529
|$574
|-
|-
|Changes in Inventories ($million)
|Effect of Exchange Rate ($million)
| style="color: red;" |-$1,709
| -$444
| style="color: red;" |-$422
| style="color: red;" |-$183
| style="color: red;" |-$429
|$334
| style="color: red;" |-$1,023
|$8
| style="color: red;" |-$23
|-
|-
|Other Operating Activities ($million)
|Net Cash Flow ($million)
| style="color: red;" |-$3,676
| -$1,220
| style="color: red;" |-$1,667
| style="color: red;" |-$1,757
| style="color: red;" |-$937
|$13,118
| style="color: red;" |-$504
|$2,506
|-
|$312
|Liabilities ($million)
|}
|$6,033
 
|$2,925
{{Tesla income statement}}
|$1,384
 
|$2,082
{| class="wikitable"
|+Financial ratios
!Year end date
!31/12/2021
!31/12/2020
!31/12/2019
!31/12/2018
|-
|-
|Net Cash Flow-Operating ($million)
| colspan="5" |'''Liquidity Ratios'''
| $11,497
| $5,943
| $2,405
|$2,098
|-
|-
|'''Cash Flows-Investing Activities'''
|Current Ratio
|
|138%
|
| 188%
|
| 113%
|
| 83%
|-
|-
|Capital Expenditures ($million)
|Quick Ratio
| style="color: red;" |-$6,514
|108%
| style="color: red;" |-$3,232
|159%
| style="color: red;" |-$1,432
|80%
| style="color: red;" |-$2,319
|52%
|-
|-
|Investments ($million)
|Cash Ratio
| style="color: red;" |-$132
|90%
| --
|136%
| --
|59%
| --
|39%
|-
|-
|Other Investing Activities ($million)
| colspan="5" |'''Profitability Ratios'''
| style="color: red;" |-$1,222
|$100
| style="color: red;" |-$4
| style="color: red;" |-$18
|-
|-
|Net Cash Flows-Investing ($million)
|Gross Margin
| style="color: red;" |-$7,868
|25%
| style="color: red;" |-$3,132
|21%
| style="color: red;" |-$1,436
|17%
| style="color: red;" |-$2,337
|19%
|-
|-
|'''Cash Flows-Financing Activities'''
|Operating Margin
|
|12%
|
|6%
|
|0%
|
|0%
|-
|-
|Sale and Purchase of Stock ($million)
|Pre-Tax Margin
|$699
| 12%
|$12,675
| 4%
|$1,555
| 0%
|$727
|0%
|-
|-
|Net Borrowings ($million)
|Profit Margin
| style="color: red;" |-$5,732
|10%
| style="color: red;" |-$2,488
|2%
|$798
|0%
|$89
|0%
|-
|-
|Other Financing Activities ($million)
|Pre-Tax ROE
| --
|21%
| --
|5%
| --
|0%
| --
|0%
|-
|-
|Net Cash Flows-Financing ($million)
|After Tax ROE
| style="color: red;" |-$5,203
|18%
|$9,973
|3%
|$1,529
|0%
|$574
|0%
|-
|Effect of Exchange Rate ($million)
| style="color: red;" |-$183
|$334
|$8
| style="color: red;" |-$23
|-
|Net Cash Flow ($million)
| style="color: red;" |-$1,757
|$13,118
|$2,506
|$312
|}
|}


{{Tesla income statement}}
===Relative valuation approach===
As noted earlier in this report, research suggests that in terms of estimating the expected return of an investment over a period of 12-months or more, the approach that is more accurate is the discounted cash flow approach, so that's the approach that Stockhub suggests using to determine the estimated value of the company (the valuation based on the discounted cash flow approach can be found in the valuation section of this report); nevertheless, for completeness purposes, separately, the valuation of the company is also estimated using the relative valuation approach.
 
====What's the expected return of an investment in Tesla using the relative valuation approach?====


{| class="wikitable"
Accordingly, Stockhub estimates that the expected return of an investment in Tesla Inc over the next five years is 4.4x. In other words, an £1,000 investment in the company is expected to return £4,400 in five years time.  The assumptions used to estimate the return figure can be found in the table below.
|+Financial ratios
 
!Year end date
Assuming that a suitable return level over five years is 10% per year and Tesla achieves its expected return level (of 4.4x), then an investment in the company is considered to be a 'suitable' one.
!31/12/2021
 
!31/12/2020
====What are the assumptions used to estimate the return figure?====
!31/12/2019
{| class="wikitable"
!31/12/2018
|+Key inputs
!Description
!Value
!Commentary
|-
|-
| colspan="5" |'''Liquidity Ratios'''
| Which type of multiple do you want to use?
| Growth-adjusted EV/sales
| For the numerator, the Stockhub users believe that to account for the different financial leverage levels of its peers, it's best to use enterprise value (EV), rather than price. For the denominator, the Stockhub users believe that because it expects Tesla to reinvest almost all of its revenue back into the business  over the five year forecast period and therefore its earnings are expected to be abnormally low over the period, it's best to use sales. Accordingly, the Stockhub users suggest valuing its company using the EV/sales ratio. However, the Stockhub users think that to take into account the different business lifecycle stages of its peers, the most suitable valuation multiple to use is the growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple<ref group="Note" name="Note15" />, rather than the EV/sales multiple.
|-
|-
|Current Ratio
|In regards to the growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple, for the sales figure, which year to you want to use?
|138%
 
| 188%
|Year 5
| 113%
|Stockhub suggests that with sales forecast to grow exponential over the five year forecast period, it's best to use forward-looking data, rather than historic data.
| 83%
 
 
In regards to the growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple, for the sales figure, Stockhub suggests that in order to account for the forecasted exponential growth of the business, it's best to use one at the end of the forecast period (i.e. Year 5).
|-
|-
|Quick Ratio
|In regards to the growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple, for the sales growth figure, which year(s) do you want to use?
|108%
|Year 6 to 8, from now
|159%
|Stockhub suggests that for the sales growth figure, it's best to use Year 6 to 8.
|80%
|52%
|-
|-
|Cash Ratio
|In regards to the growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple, what multiple figure do you want to use?
|90%
|89x
|136%
|In Stockhub's view, Tesla closest peer is [[Apple, Inc.|Apple, Inc]]. [[Apple, Inc.|Apple, Inc]] trades on a multiple of 89x.
|59%
|39%
|-
|-
| colspan="5" |'''Profitability Ratios'''
|Which financial forecasts to use?
|Stockhub
|The only available forecasts are the ones that are supplied by the Stockhub company (the forecasts can be found in the financials section of this report), so Stockhub suggests using those.
|-
|-
|Gross Margin
| What's the current value of the Stockhub company?
|25%
|$688 billion
|21%
|As at 21st May 2022, the current value of its company at $688 billion.
|17%
|19%
|-
|-
|Operating Margin
|Which time period do you want to use to estimate the expected return?
|12%
|Between now and five years time
|6%
|Stockhub suggests that to account for general market cyclicity, it's best to estimate the expected return of the company between now and five years time.
|0%
|}
|0%
 
===Tesla peer(s)===
 
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|+Valuation table
|-
|-
|Pre-Tax Margin
!Investments!! Industry !!Enterprise value/sales!!1-year forward revenue growth rates (%)!!Growth-adjusted enterprise value/sales ratio
| 12%
| 4%
| 0%
|0%
|-
|-
|Profit Margin
| [[Apple, Inc.|Apple, Inc]]||Internet content & communication||7.27x<ref name=":0">Morningstar, Inc.</ref>||8.20%<ref name=":0" />|| style="background: blue; color: white;" |89x
|10%
|}
|2%
{| class="wikitable"
|0%
|+Tesla peers
|0%
!Peer
!Three-year average COGS margin (%)
!Three-year average SG&A margin (%)
!Three-year average tax margin (%)
!Three-year average depreciation rate (%)
!Three-year average fixed capital margin (%)
!Three-year average change in working capital ($000)
!Three-year average growth stage
!Discount rate
|-
|-
|Pre-Tax ROE
|Rivian Automotive, Inc.
|21%
|945%
|5%
|6827%
|0%
|0%
|0%
|358%
|3262%
|7,569,000
|1
|NA
|-
|Tesla, Inc.
|79%
|15%
|11%
|7%
|10%
|3,121,828
|2
|14.96%
|-
|-
|After Tax ROE
|Apple, Inc
|18%
|62%
|13%
|14%
|4%
|3%
|3%
|0%
| -18,780,000
|0%
|3
|}
|9.91%
 
===Relative valuation approach===
As noted earlier in this report, research suggests that in terms of estimating the expected return of an investment over a period of 12-months or more, the approach that is more accurate is the discounted cash flow approach, so that's the approach that Stockhub suggests using to determine the estimated value of the company (the valuation based on the discounted cash flow approach can be found in the valuation section of this report); nevertheless, for completeness purposes, separately, the valuation of the company is also estimated using the relative valuation approach.
 
====What's the expected return of an investment in Tesla using the relative valuation approach?====
 
Accordingly, Stockhub estimates that the expected return of an investment in Tesla Inc over the next five years is 4.4x. In other words, an £1,000 investment in the company is expected to return £4,400 in five years time.  The assumptions used to estimate the return figure can be found in the table below.
 
Assuming that a suitable return level over five years is 10% per year and Tesla achieves its expected return level (of 4.4x), then an investment in the company is considered to be a 'suitable' one.
 
====What are the assumptions used to estimate the return figure?====
{| class="wikitable"
|+Key inputs
!Description
!Value
!Commentary
|-
|-
| Which type of multiple do you want to use?
|Workhorse Group
| Growth-adjusted EV/sales
|938%
| For the numerator, the Stockhub users believe that to account for the different financial leverage levels of its peers, it's best to use enterprise value (EV), rather than price. For the denominator, the Stockhub users believe that because it expects Tesla to reinvest almost all of its revenue back into the business  over the five year forecast period and therefore its earnings are expected to be abnormally low over the period, it's best to use sales. Accordingly, the Stockhub users suggest valuing its company using the EV/sales ratio. However, the Stockhub users think that to take into account the different business lifecycle stages of its peers, the most suitable valuation multiple to use is the growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple<ref group="Note" name="Note15" />, rather than the EV/sales multiple.  
| -6077%
|0%
|58%
|411%
| -2,978
|4
|18.75%
|-
|-
|In regards to the growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple, for the sales figure, which year to you want to use?
|Cenntro Electric Group Limited
 
|90%
|Year 5
|209%
|Stockhub suggests that with sales forecast to grow exponential over the five year forecast period, it's best to use forward-looking data, rather than historic data.
|0%
 
|37%
 
|0%
In regards to the growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple, for the sales figure, Stockhub suggests that in order to account for the forecasted exponential growth of the business, it's best to use one at the end of the forecast period (i.e. Year 5).  
|138,382
|4
|10.44%
|-
|-
|In regards to the growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple, for the sales growth figure, which year(s) do you want to use?
|Liaoning SG Automotive Group Co
|Year 6 to 8, from now
|99%
|Stockhub suggests that for the sales growth figure, it's best to use Year 6 to 8.
|15%
|-
|18%
|In regards to the growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple, what multiple figure do you want to use?
|8%
|89x
|1%
|In Stockhub's view, Tesla closest peer is [[Apple, Inc.|Apple, Inc]]. [[Apple, Inc.|Apple, Inc]] trades on a multiple of 89x.
|154,153
|-
|4
|Which financial forecasts to use?
|6.39%
|Stockhub
|}
|The only available forecasts are the ones that are supplied by the Stockhub company (the forecasts can be found in the financials section of this report), so Stockhub suggests using those.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|+Growth stage
| What's the current value of the Stockhub company?
!Growth stage
|$688 billion
|As at 21st May 2022, the current value of its company at $688 billion.
|-
|Which time period do you want to use to estimate the expected return?
|Between now and five years time
|Stockhub suggests that to account for general market cyclicity, it's best to estimate the expected return of the company between now and five years time.
|}
 
===Tesla peer(s)===
 
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|+Valuation table
|-
!Investments!! Industry !!Enterprise value/sales!!1-year forward revenue growth rates (%)!!Growth-adjusted enterprise value/sales ratio
|-
| [[Apple, Inc.|Apple, Inc]]||Internet content & communication||7.27x<ref name=":0">Morningstar, Inc.</ref>||8.20%<ref name=":0" />|| style="background: blue; color: white;" |89x
|}
{| class="wikitable"
|+Tesla peers
!Peer
!Three-year average COGS margin (%)
!Three-year average COGS margin (%)
!Three-year average SG&A margin (%)
!Three-year average SG&A margin (%)
Line 2,276: Line 2,222:
!Three-year average fixed capital margin (%)
!Three-year average fixed capital margin (%)
!Three-year average change in working capital ($000)
!Three-year average change in working capital ($000)
!Three-year average growth stage
!Discount rate
!Discount rate
|-
|-
|Rivian Automotive, Inc.
|One
|945%
|945%
|6827%
|6827%
Line 2,286: Line 2,231:
|3262%
|3262%
|7,569,000
|7,569,000
|1
|NA
|NA
|-
|-
|Tesla, Inc.
|Two
|79%
|79%
|15%
|15%
Line 2,296: Line 2,240:
|10%
|10%
|3,121,828
|3,121,828
|2
|14.96%
|14.96%
|-
|-
|Apple, Inc
|Three
|62%
|62%
|13%
|13%
Line 2,306: Line 2,249:
|3%
|3%
| -18,780,000
| -18,780,000
|3
|9.91%
|9.91%
|-
|-
|Workhorse Group
|Four
|938%
|99%
| -6077%
|15%
|0%
|58%
|411%
| -2,978
|4
|18.75%
|-
|Cenntro Electric Group Limited
|90%
|209%
|0%
|0%
|37%
|37%
|0%
|1%
|138,382
|138,382
|4
|10.44%
|10.44%
|-
|Liaoning SG Automotive Group Co
|99%
|15%
|18%
|8%
|1%
|154,153
|4
|6.39%
|}
|}
==== Apple Inc. ====
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+Growth stage
|+Cost of equity (%)
!Growth stage
!Input
!Three-year average COGS margin (%)
!Input value
!Three-year average SG&A margin (%)
!Additional information
!Three-year average tax margin (%)
!Three-year average depreciation rate (%)
!Three-year average fixed capital margin (%)
!Three-year average change in working capital ($000)
!Discount rate
|-
|-
|One
|Risk-free rate (%)
|945%
|3.44%
|6827%
|Here, the risk free rate is the US 30 year treasury bond, and is calculated as at 15th September 2022.
|0%
|358%
|3262%
|7,569,000
|NA
|-
|-
|Two
|Beta
|79%
|1.23
|15%
|The asset’s beta measures its market or systematic risk, which in theory is the sensitivity of its returns to the returns on the “market portfolio” of risky assets. Concretely, beta equals the covariance of returns with the returns on the market portfolio divided by the market portfolio’s variance of returns. In typical practice for equity valuation, the market portfolio is represented by a broad value-weighted equity market index. The asset’s beta is estimated by a least squares regression of the asset’s returns on the index’s returns.
|11%
 
|7%
In the typical case in which the equity risk premium is based on a national equity market index and estimated beta is based on sensitivity to that index, the assumption is being made implicitly that equity prices are largely determined by local investors. When equities markets are segmented in that sense (i.e., local market prices are largely determined by local investors rather than by investors worldwide), two issues with the same risk characteristics can have different required returns if they trade in different markets.
|10%
 
|3,121,828
The opposite assumption is that all investors worldwide participate equally in setting prices (perfectly integrated markets). That assumption results in the international CAPM (or world CAPM) in which the risk premium is relative to a world market portfolio. In practice, the international CAPM is not commonly relied on for required return on equity estimation.
|14.96%
 
For estimating the required return on the equity using the Capital Asset Pricing Model, in terms of time period, and frequency of observations, the most common choice is five years of monthly data, yielding 60 observations. One study of U.S. stocks found support for five years of monthly data over alternatives. An argument can be made that the 2 years, weekly data can be especially appropriate in fast growing markets.
 
The beta value in a future period has been found to be on average closer to the mean value of 1.0, the beta of an average-systematic-risk security, than to the value of the raw beta. Because valuation is forward looking, it is logical to adjust the raw beta so it more accurately predicts a future beta.
 
The figure here is taken from Yahoo Finance on 16th September 2022<ref>https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/quote/AAPL?p=AAPL&.tsrc=fin-srch</ref>.
|-
|-
|Three
|Equity risk premium (%)
|62%
|{{#lst:Template:Regional weighted average equity risk premium|Global weighted average equity risk premium}}
|13%
|The equity risk premium is the incremental return (premium) that investors require for holding equities rather than a risk-free asset (e.g., government bills or government bonds). Thus, it is the difference between the required return on equities and a specified expected risk-free rate of return. The equity risk premium, like the required return, depends strictly on expectations for the future because the investor’s returns depend only on the investment’s future cash flows.  
|14%
Note: the definition of risk-free asset used in estimating the equity risk premium should correspond to the one used in specifying the current expected risk-free return.
|4%
 
|3%
Typically, analysts estimate the equity risk premium for the national equity market of the issues being analyzed (but if a global CAPM is being used, a world equity premium is estimated that takes into account the totality of equity markets).
| -18,780,000
|9.91%
|-
|Four
|99%
|15%
|0%
|37%
|1%
|138,382
|10.44%
|}
 
==== Apple Inc. ====
{| class="wikitable"
|+Cost of equity (%)
!Input
!Input value
!Additional information
|-
|Risk-free rate (%)
|3.44%
|Here, the risk free rate is the US 30 year treasury bond, and is calculated as at 15th September 2022.
|-
|Beta
|1.23
|The asset’s beta measures its market or systematic risk, which in theory is the sensitivity of its returns to the returns on the “market portfolio” of risky assets. Concretely, beta equals the covariance of returns with the returns on the market portfolio divided by the market portfolio’s variance of returns. In typical practice for equity valuation, the market portfolio is represented by a broad value-weighted equity market index. The asset’s beta is estimated by a least squares regression of the asset’s returns on the index’s returns.
 
In the typical case in which the equity risk premium is based on a national equity market index and estimated beta is based on sensitivity to that index, the assumption is being made implicitly that equity prices are largely determined by local investors. When equities markets are segmented in that sense (i.e., local market prices are largely determined by local investors rather than by investors worldwide), two issues with the same risk characteristics can have different required returns if they trade in different markets.
 
The opposite assumption is that all investors worldwide participate equally in set- ting prices (perfectly integrated markets). That assumption results in the international CAPM (or world CAPM) in which the risk premium is relative to a world market portfolio. In practice, the international CAPM is not commonly relied on for required return on equity estimation.
 
For estimating the required return on the equity using the Capital Asset Pricing Model, in terms of time period, and frequency of observations, the most common choice is five years of monthly data, yielding 60 observations. One study of U.S. stocks found support for five years of monthly data over alternatives. An argument can be made that the 2 years, weekly data can be especially appropriate in fast growing markets.
 
The beta value in a future period has been found to be on average closer to the mean value of 1.0, the beta of an average-systematic-risk security, than to the value of the raw beta. Because valuation is forward looking, it is logical to adjust the raw beta so it more accurately predicts a future beta.
 
The figure here is taken from Yahoo Finance (https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/quote/AAPL?p=AAPL&.tsrc=fin-srch), on 16th September 2022.
|-
|Equity risk premium (%)
|{{#lst:Template:Regional weighted average equity risk premium|Global weighted average equity risk premium}}
|The equity risk premium is the incremental return (premium) that investors require for holding equities rather than a risk-free asset (e.g., government bills or government bonds). Thus, it is the difference between the required return on equities and a specified expected risk-free rate of return. The equity risk premium, like the required return, depends strictly on expectations for the future because the investor’s returns depend only on the investment’s future cash flows.  
Note: the definition of risk-free asset used in estimating the equity risk premium should correspond to the one used in specifying the current expected risk-free return.
 
Typically, analysts estimate the equity risk premium for the national equity market of the issues being analyzed (but if a global CAPM is being used, a world equity premium is estimated that takes into account the totality of equity markets).


'''Historical estimates'''
'''Historical estimates'''
Line 2,427: Line 2,301:
'''Forward-looking estimates'''
'''Forward-looking estimates'''


Because the equity risk premium is based only on expectations for economic and financial variables from the present going forward, it is logical to estimate the premium directly based on current information and expectations concerning such variables. Such estimates are often called forward-looking or ex ante estimates. In principle, such estimates may agree with, be higher, or be lower than historical equity risk premium estimates. Ex ante estimates are likely to be less subject to an issue such as non-stationarity or data biases than historical estimates. However, such estimates are often subject to other potential errors related to financial and economic models and potential behavioural biases in forecasting.
Because the equity risk premium is based only on expectations for economic and financial variables from the present going forward, it is logical to estimate the premium directly based on current information and expectations concerning such variables. Such estimates are often called forward-looking or ex ante estimates. In principle, such estimates may agree with, be higher, or be lower than historical equity risk premium estimates. Ex ante estimates are likely to be less subject to an issue such as non-stationarity or data biases than historical estimates. However, such estimates are often subject to other potential errors related to financial and economic models and potential behavioural biases in forecasting. Here, the equity risk premium is in relation to the global region, and is calculated as at 1st January 2022 <ref>https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/ctryprem.html</ref>.
 
Here, the equity risk premium is in relation to the global region, and is calculated as at 1st January 2022 (<nowiki>https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/ctryprem.html</nowiki>).
|-
|-
|Cost of equity (%)
|Cost of equity (%)
Line 2,673: Line 2,545:
|Agriculture, Forestry and Land Use
|Agriculture, Forestry and Land Use
|}
|}
=== Liquidity ===
Our assessment reveals that Tesla's shares exhibit a high level of liquidity, as evidenced by its bid-ask margin of 0.0297%. To gauge the bid-ask margin, we divided the ask-bid spread by the ask price. Our criterion for classifying an investment as 'highly' liquid is a bid-ask margin of 1% or less. For more details on liquidity ratings, please refer to the appendix section of this report.
Furthermore, the average daily trading volume of Tesla, Inc. shares is 132,160,233 for 30 days and 127,970,670 for 90 days, which, based on the current share price (i.e. $168.29), equates to a share value of $22.24 billion and $21.54 billion.
{| class="wikitable"
|+Tesla bid-ask margin
!Metric
!Amount
|-
|Bid price (USD)
|168.24
|-
|Ask price (USD)
|168.29
|-
|Spread (USD)
|0.05
|-
|Margin (%)
|0.0297
|}
{| class="wikitable"
|+Average Tesla shares trade volume
!Days
!Average shares volume
|-
|30 days
|   132,160,233
|-
|90 days
|  127,970,670
|}
{| class="wikitable"
|+Tesla shares trade volume over the last 90 days
!Date
!Volume
|-
|28/04/2023
|        122,515,800
|-
|01/05/2023
|        109,015,000
|-
|02/05/2023
|        128,259,700
|-
|03/05/2023
|        119,728,000
|-
|04/05/2023
|          95,108,500
|-
|05/05/2023
|        107,440,900
|-
|08/05/2023
|        112,249,400
|-
|09/05/2023
|          88,965,000
|-
|10/05/2023
|        119,840,700
|-
|11/05/2023
|        103,889,900
|-
|12/05/2023
|        157,577,100
|-
|15/05/2023
|        105,592,500
|-
|16/05/2023
|          98,288,800
|-
|17/05/2023
|        125,473,600
|-
|18/05/2023
|        109,520,300
|-
|19/05/2023
|        136,024,200
|-
|22/05/2023
|        132,001,400
|-
|23/05/2023
|        156,952,100
|-
|24/05/2023
|        137,605,100
|-
|25/05/2023
|          96,870,700
|-
|26/05/2023
|        162,061,500
|-
|30/05/2023
|        128,818,700
|-
|31/05/2023
|        150,711,700
|-
|01/06/2023
|        148,029,900
|-
|02/06/2023
|        164,129,000
|-
|05/06/2023
|        151,143,100
|-
|06/06/2023
|        146,911,600
|-
|07/06/2023
|        185,710,800
|-
|08/06/2023
|        164,489,700
|-
|09/06/2023
|        199,882,300
|-
|12/06/2023
|        150,337,900
|-
|13/06/2023
|        162,384,300
|-
|14/06/2023
|        170,575,500
|-
|15/06/2023
|        160,171,200
|-
|16/06/2023
|        167,563,700
|-
|20/06/2023
|        165,611,200
|-
|21/06/2023
|        211,797,100
|-
|22/06/2023
|        166,875,900
|-
|23/06/2023
|        176,584,100
|-
|26/06/2023
|        179,990,600
|-
|27/06/2023
|        164,968,200
|-
|28/06/2023
|        159,770,800
|-
|29/06/2023
|        131,283,400
|-
|30/06/2023
|        112,267,600
|-
|03/07/2023
|        119,685,900
|-
|05/07/2023
|        131,530,900
|-
|06/07/2023
|        120,332,100
|-
|07/07/2023
|        113,602,000
|-
|10/07/2023
|        119,425,400
|-
|11/07/2023
|          91,972,400
|-
|12/07/2023
|          95,672,100
|-
|13/07/2023
|        112,681,500
|-
|14/07/2023
|        119,771,100
|-
|17/07/2023
|        131,569,600
|-
|18/07/2023
|        112,434,700
|-
|19/07/2023
|        142,355,400
|-
|20/07/2023
|        175,158,300
|-
|21/07/2023
|        161,050,100
|-
|24/07/2023
|        136,508,500
|-
|25/07/2023
|        112,757,300
|-
|26/07/2023
|          95,856,200
|-
|27/07/2023
|        103,697,300
|-
|28/07/2023
|        111,446,000
|-
|31/07/2023
|          84,582,200
|-
|01/08/2023
|          83,166,000
|-
|02/08/2023
|        101,752,900
|-
|03/08/2023
|          97,569,100
|-
|04/08/2023
|          99,242,600
|-
|07/08/2023
|        111,097,900
|-
|08/08/2023
|          96,642,200
|-
|09/08/2023
|        101,596,300
|-
|10/08/2023
|        109,498,600
|-
|11/08/2023
|          98,866,600
|-
|14/08/2023
|          98,595,300
|-
|15/08/2023
|          88,197,600
|-
|16/08/2023
|        112,484,500
|-
|17/08/2023
|        120,718,400
|-
|18/08/2023
|        135,813,700
|-
|21/08/2023
|        135,702,700
|-
|22/08/2023
|        130,597,900
|-
|23/08/2023
|        101,077,600
|-
|24/08/2023
|          99,777,400
|-
|25/08/2023
|        106,612,200
|-
|28/08/2023
|        107,673,700
|-
|29/08/2023
|        134,047,600
|-
|30/08/2023
|        121,988,400
|-
|31/08/2023
|        108,861,700
|-
|01/09/2023
|        132,272,500
|-
|05/09/2023
|        129,469,600
|-
|06/09/2023
|        116,959,800
|}


== Notes==
== Notes==
Line 3,032: Line 2,595:


The kilowatt-hour (kWh) is a unit of energy equal to one kilowatt of power sustained for one hour and is commonly used as a measure of electrical energy. One kilowatt-hour is equal to 3600 kilojoules (3.6 megajoules).
The kilowatt-hour (kWh) is a unit of energy equal to one kilowatt of power sustained for one hour and is commonly used as a measure of electrical energy. One kilowatt-hour is equal to 3600 kilojoules (3.6 megajoules).
'''Powerwall annual cost calculation'''
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+'''Powerwall annual cost calculation'''
|+'''Powerwall annual cost calculation'''
Please note that all contributions to Stockhub may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Stockhub:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Stockhub entities used in this page

Templates used on this page: