Editing Tesla, Inc.

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox company
{{{Logo|[[File:Tesla logo.jpg|150px]]}}}
| name = Tesla, Inc.
| logo = Tesla Motors.svg
| logo_size = 109px
| image = Gigafactory Texas Building 1 June 2022.jpg
| image_caption = Headquarters ([[Gigafactory Texas]]) in [[Austin, Texas]]
| former_name = Tesla Motors (2003–2017)
| type = [[Public company|Public]]
| traded_as = {{Unbulleted list
  | {{NASDAQ|TSLA}}
  | [[Nasdaq-100]] component
  | [[S&P 100]] component
  | [[S&P 500]] component
  }}
| ISIN = {{ISIN|sl=n|pl=y|US88160R1014}}
| industry = {{Unbulleted list
  | [[Automotive industry|Automotive]]
  | [[Renewable energy industry|Renewable energy]]
  }}
| founded = {{Start date and age|2003|07|01}} in [[San Carlos, California]], U.S.
| founders = See [[#Founding (2003–2004)|§ Founding]]<!-- Has complications and is disputed, do not put individual names here -->
| hq_location = [[Gigafactory Texas|13101 Tesla Road]]
| hq_location_city = Austin<!-- Do not link, search MOS:GEOLINK for further guidance -->, Texas<!-- Do not link, search MOS:GEOLINK for further guidance -->
| hq_location_country = U.S.
| num_locations = 764 retail stores/galleries and service centers (2022)<!-- Reported in 10K_2022 -->
| area_served = {{Flatlist|
* East Asia
* Europe
* Middle East
* North America
* Oceania
* Southeast Asia
}}
| key_people = {{Unbulleted list
<!-- Do not add "Technoking" or "Master of Coin" to the titles in this list until reaching consensus on the Talk page.-->
  | [[Elon Musk]] (CEO)
  | [[Robyn Denholm]] (chair)
  }}
| products = {{Flatlist|
* [[Tesla Model 3|Model 3]]
* [[Tesla Model S|Model S]]
* [[Tesla Model X|Model X]]
* [[Tesla Model Y|Model Y]]
* [[Tesla Semi|Semi]]
* [[Tesla Powerwall|Powerwall]], [[Tesla Powerpack|Powerpack]], and [[Tesla Megapack|Megapack]]
* [[Tesla solar panels|solar panels]] and [[Tesla Solar Roof|Solar Roof]]
}}
| production = {{Unbulleted list
  | {{increase}} 1,369,611 vehicles (2022)
  | {{increase}} 6.54 GWh battery energy storage systems (2022)
  | {{increase}} 348 MW solar (2022)
  }}
| services = {{Flatlist|
* [[#Vehicle servicing|Service]]
* [[#Charging|charging]]
* [[#Insurance|insurance]]
* [[#Connectivity|connectivity]]
}}
| revenue = {{increase}} {{US$|81.46|linked=yes}}&nbsp;billion (2022)
| operating_income = {{increase}} {{US$|13.66}}&nbsp;billion (2022)
| net_income = {{increase}} {{US$|12.56}}&nbsp;billion (2022)
| assets = {{increase}} {{US$|82.34}}&nbsp;billion (2022)
| equity = {{increase}} {{US$|44.70}}&nbsp;billion (2022)
| owner = Elon Musk (20.6%)<ref>{{cite web|title=Tesla, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement (DEF 14A) |date=April 6, 2023|url=https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000119312523094075/d451342ddef14a.htm#toc451342_59|publisher=[[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]]}}</ref>
| num_employees = {{increase}} 127,855 (2022)<!-- Reported in 10K_2022 -->
| subsid = {{Unbulleted list
  | [[Tesla Energy]]
  | [[Tesla Automation]]
  }}
| website = {{Official URL}}
| footnotes = Financials {{as of|2022|12|31|df=US|lc=y}}.<br />References:<ref>{{cite web |title=The Making Of Tesla: Invention, Betrayal, And The Birth Of The Roadster |first=Drake |last=Baer|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/tesla-the-origin-story-2014-10
|date=November 11, 2014
|access-date=October 3, 2018 |website=Business Insider}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Tesla Energy Generation And Storage Business: Q4 2020 Results |url=https://insideevs.com/news/482496/tesla-energy-generation-storage-q4-2020-results/ | date=January 27, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Elon Musk |url=https://www.forbes.com/profile/elon-musk/ |website=[[Forbes]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000156459021044307/tsla-pre14a_20210813.htm | title=Schedule 14A Information  | publisher=[[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]]}}</ref><ref name="10K_2022">{{cite web |title=Annual report Form 10-K 2022 Tesla Inc. |url=https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000095017023001409/tsla-20221231.htm |date=January 31, 2023 |publisher=[[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]]}}</ref>
}}Energy production and consumption are responsible for 76% of annual human-caused greenhouse gas emissions<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" />, and Tesla is on a mission to accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy.<ref name=":3">https://www.tesla.com/about</ref>


The company sells and leases high-performance fully electric vehicles and energy generation and storage systems, and offers services related to its products. Tesla emphasises performance, attractive styling and the safety of its users in the design and manufacture of its products and is continuing to develop full self-driving technology for improved safety. The company also strives to lower the cost of ownership for its customers through continuous efforts to reduce manufacturing costs and by offering financial and other services tailored to its products.<ref name=":4">https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000156459021004599/tsla-10k_20201231.htm</ref>
{{Short description|On a mission to accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy.}}


Assuming that Tesla increases its share of the automotive market to 10% (from 2%) and other assumptions, the expected return of an investment in the company over the next five years is negative 24%, which equates to an annual return of negative 4%. In other words, an £100,000 investment in the company is expected to return £76,000 in five years time.
{| class="wikitable"
|+ Key information
|-
| Risk/return|| High
|-
| Price per share|| $703.55<ref name=":1">https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/quote/TSLA/profile?p=TSLA</ref>
|-
| Asset class|| Equities<ref name=":2">https://sec.report/CIK/0001318605#:~:text=Tesla%2C%20Inc.%20is%20incorporated%20in,motor%20vehicles%20%26%20passenger%20car%20bodies.</ref>
|-
| Industry|| Consumer Cyclical<ref name=":1" />
|-
| Country of incorporation|| United States<ref name=":2" />
|-
| Minimum investment amount|| $10<ref name=":10">https://www.business2community.com/stocks/buy-tesla-stock</ref>
|-
| Maximum investment amount|| $728.88 billion<ref name=":1" />
|-
| Current valuation|| $728.88 billion<ref name=":1" />
|-
| Investor type|| All
|-
| Bid/ask spread (%)|| 0.0015063%<ref name=":1" />
|-
| Commission amount|| Zero<ref name=":10" />
|-
| Market|| Public<ref name=":1" />
|}


The degree of risk associated with an investment in Tesla is 'high', with the shares having a beta that is 112% above the market (2.12 vs. 1). Furthermore, Tesla's shares exhibit a 'high' level of liquidity, as evidenced by its bid-ask margin of 0.0297%.
==Summary==


Accordingly, based on the assumptions provided on the Stockhub platform,  an investment in the company is considered to be a 'suitable' one for you if, among other criteria, your required:
* {{{Summary|Tesla is on a mission to accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy.<ref name=":3">https://www.tesla.com/about</ref>
* Return level is negative 4% per year or less in absolute terms;
*The company sells and leases high-performance fully electric vehicles and energy generation and storage systems, and offers services related to its products. It emphasises performance, attractive styling and the safety of its users in the design and manufacture of its products and is continuing to develop full self-driving technology for improved safety. It also strives to lower the cost of ownership for its customers through continuous efforts to reduce manufacturing costs and by offering financial and other services tailored to its products.<ref name=":4">https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000156459021004599/tsla-10k_20201231.htm</ref>
* Risk level is 112% or more above the market risk level;
* Assuming that Tesla increases its share of the automotive market to 10% (from 2%) and other assumptions, the expected return of an investment in the company over the next five years is 72%. In other words, an £1,000 investment in the company is expected to return £1,720 in five years time.
* Time horizon is five years or longer;
* The degree of risk associated with an investment in Tesla is 'high'.}}}
* Bid-ask margin is 0.0297% or more; and/or
* Objective is to help accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy.


'''Fun fact:''' Tesla, Inc. was named after inventor Nikola Tesla and was founded in 2003 by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning, not Elon Musk, who joined later as an investor and chairman.
* The company sells and leases high-performance fully electric vehicles and energy generation and storage systems, and offers services related to its products. It emphasises performance, attractive styling and the safety of its users in the design and manufacture of its products and is continuing to develop full self-driving technology for improved safety. It also strives to lower the cost of ownership for its customers through continuous efforts to reduce manufacturing costs and by offering financial and other services tailored to its products.<ref name=":4">https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000156459021004599/tsla-10k_20201231.htm</ref>
* Assuming that Tesla increases its share of the automotive market to 10% (from 2%) and other assumptions, the expected return of an investment in the company over the next five years is 72%. In other words, an £1,000 investment in the company is expected to return £1,720 in five years time.
* The degree of risk associated with an investment in Tesla is 'high'.


==Operations==
==Operations==
Line 94: Line 47:
The idea of the company came about when the now founding team of the company realised that the current way that humankind is meeting its energy needs is unsustainable and bad for the planet.<ref name=":9">https://www.tesla.com/en_GB/blog/secret-tesla-motors-master-plan-just-between-you-and-me</ref>  
The idea of the company came about when the now founding team of the company realised that the current way that humankind is meeting its energy needs is unsustainable and bad for the planet.<ref name=":9">https://www.tesla.com/en_GB/blog/secret-tesla-motors-master-plan-just-between-you-and-me</ref>  


Currently, an estimated 85% of the world's energy needs are met by burning fossil fuels<ref>https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/30797/EGR2019.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y</ref>, and energy production and consumption are responsible for 76% of annual human-caused greenhouse gas emissions.<ref name=":1">https://www.climatewatchdata.org/ghg-emissions?breakBy=sector&chartType=percentage&end_year=2018&sectors=total-including-lucf&start_year=1990</ref><ref name=":2">https://www.wri.org/insights/4-charts-explain-greenhouse-gas-emissions-countries-and-sectors</ref>
Currently, an estimated 85% of the world's energy needs are met by burning fossil fuels<ref>https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/30797/EGR2019.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y</ref>, and energy production and consumption are responsible for 76% of annual human-caused greenhouse gas emissions.<ref>https://www.climatewatchdata.org/ghg-emissions?breakBy=sector&chartType=percentage&end_year=2018&sectors=total-including-lucf&start_year=1990</ref><ref>https://www.wri.org/insights/4-charts-explain-greenhouse-gas-emissions-countries-and-sectors</ref>


Researching into a better way to meet the energy needs, the team concluded that the best way to do so is to move to a solar electric economy, from a mine-and-burn hydrocarbon economy.<ref name=":9" />
Researching into a better way to meet the energy needs, the team concluded that the best way to do so is to move to a solar electric economy, from a mine-and-burn hydrocarbon economy.<ref name=":9" />
Line 121: Line 74:
Model S is the fastest accelerating and longest ranging car that Tesla provides, with a zero-to-60 miles per hour acceleration of 3.1 seconds and a maximum distance range on a single battery charge of 405 miles, respectively.<ref>https://www.tesla.com/</ref> The price of the car in the US is $99,990.<ref name=":8" />
Model S is the fastest accelerating and longest ranging car that Tesla provides, with a zero-to-60 miles per hour acceleration of 3.1 seconds and a maximum distance range on a single battery charge of 405 miles, respectively.<ref>https://www.tesla.com/</ref> The price of the car in the US is $99,990.<ref name=":8" />


[[File:Model S.jpg]]
[[File:Model S.jpg|600px]]


'''Model 3'''
'''Model 3'''
Line 127: Line 80:
Model 3 is the lowest priced car that Tesla provides, selling in the US at $46,990.
Model 3 is the lowest priced car that Tesla provides, selling in the US at $46,990.


[[File:Rhd-model-3-social.png]]
[[File:Rhd-model-3-social.png|600px]]


'''Model X'''
'''Model X'''
Line 133: Line 86:
Model X is the largest cargo capacity car that Tesla provides, with a cargo capacity of 88 cubic feet. The price of the car in the US is $114,990.
Model X is the largest cargo capacity car that Tesla provides, with a cargo capacity of 88 cubic feet. The price of the car in the US is $114,990.


[[File:MX-Hero-Desktop.jpg]]
[[File:MX-Hero-Desktop.jpg|600px]]


'''Model Y'''
'''Model Y'''
Line 139: Line 92:
Model Y is the lowest price per cargo capacity and lowest price per seat car that Tesla provides, at $829 per cubic feet and $8,999 per seat, respectively. The price of the car in the US is $62,990.
Model Y is the lowest price per cargo capacity and lowest price per seat car that Tesla provides, at $829 per cubic feet and $8,999 per seat, respectively. The price of the car in the US is $62,990.


[[File:Model y red.jpg]]
[[File:Model y red.jpg|600px]]


A detailed comparison of the Tesla vehicles is shown in the two tables below.
A detailed comparison of the Tesla vehicles is shown in the two tables below.
Line 370: Line 323:
Cybertruck is a truck, a motor vehicle designed to transport cargo, carry specialised payloads, or perform other utilitarian work. What will be unique about the offering is that it will be the safest vehicle that Tesla provides. The price of the offering is expected to be $39,900.<ref>https://www.autoexpress.co.uk/tesla/cybertruck/96447/tesla-cybertruck-delayed-until-least-2023#:~:text=Tesla%20Cybertruck%3A%20performance%20and%20range&text=Entry%2Dlevel%2C%20Single%20Motor%2C,a%20top%20speed%20of%20110mph.</ref>
Cybertruck is a truck, a motor vehicle designed to transport cargo, carry specialised payloads, or perform other utilitarian work. What will be unique about the offering is that it will be the safest vehicle that Tesla provides. The price of the offering is expected to be $39,900.<ref>https://www.autoexpress.co.uk/tesla/cybertruck/96447/tesla-cybertruck-delayed-until-least-2023#:~:text=Tesla%20Cybertruck%3A%20performance%20and%20range&text=Entry%2Dlevel%2C%20Single%20Motor%2C,a%20top%20speed%20of%20110mph.</ref>


[[File:Cybertruck-Hero-Desktop.jpg]]
[[File:Cybertruck-Hero-Desktop.jpg|600px]]


'''Tesla Roadster'''
'''Tesla Roadster'''
Line 376: Line 329:
The Tesla Roadster is a car. What will be unique about the offering is that it will be the fastest accelerating and longest ranging car that Tesla provides. The price of the offering is around $200,000.<ref>https://carbuzz.com/cars/tesla/roadster</ref>
The Tesla Roadster is a car. What will be unique about the offering is that it will be the fastest accelerating and longest ranging car that Tesla provides. The price of the offering is around $200,000.<ref>https://carbuzz.com/cars/tesla/roadster</ref>


[[File:Tesla-roadster.jpg]]
[[File:Tesla-roadster.jpg|600px]]


'''Tesla Semi'''
'''Tesla Semi'''
Line 382: Line 335:
Tesla Semi is a semi-trailer truck, a motor vehicle that is designed to transport large cargo, via one or more of its attached trailers. What will be unique about the offering is that it will be the largest cargo capacity vehicle that Tesla provides. The price of the offering is around $150,000.
Tesla Semi is a semi-trailer truck, a motor vehicle that is designed to transport large cargo, via one or more of its attached trailers. What will be unique about the offering is that it will be the largest cargo capacity vehicle that Tesla provides. The price of the offering is around $150,000.


[[File:Tesla-semi.jpg]]
[[File:Tesla-semi.jpg|600px]]


======Ride-hailing service======
======Ride-hailing service======
Line 399: Line 352:
Powerwall is a energy storage system (i.e. a type of battery).<ref name=":4" /> What’s unique about the offering is that it's the lowest priced energy storage system that Tesla provides, selling at $10,500. The energy capacity of the product is 13.5 kilowatt hour (kWh). To help put the capacity into perspective, in 2020, the average household in the United States consumed 29 kWh per day.<ref>https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=97&t=3#:~:text=How%20much%20electricity%20does%20an,about%20893%20kWh%20per%20month.</ref> So, if the average household is powered from Powerwalls only, then it will require around two Powerwalls to power the whole house, at an average annual cost of $2,247.
Powerwall is a energy storage system (i.e. a type of battery).<ref name=":4" /> What’s unique about the offering is that it's the lowest priced energy storage system that Tesla provides, selling at $10,500. The energy capacity of the product is 13.5 kilowatt hour (kWh). To help put the capacity into perspective, in 2020, the average household in the United States consumed 29 kWh per day.<ref>https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=97&t=3#:~:text=How%20much%20electricity%20does%20an,about%20893%20kWh%20per%20month.</ref> So, if the average household is powered from Powerwalls only, then it will require around two Powerwalls to power the whole house, at an average annual cost of $2,247.


[[File:Powerwall2.jpg]]
[[File:Powerwall2.jpg|600px]]


'''Megapack'''
'''Megapack'''
Line 405: Line 358:
Megapack is an energy storage system.<ref name=":4" /> What’s unique about the offering is that it's the largest energy storage system that Tesla provides, at 3.5 megawatt hour. To help put the energy capacity into perspective, each unit has enough energy to power an average of 3,600 homes for one hour. A single Megapack sells for $1,000,000.
Megapack is an energy storage system.<ref name=":4" /> What’s unique about the offering is that it's the largest energy storage system that Tesla provides, at 3.5 megawatt hour. To help put the energy capacity into perspective, each unit has enough energy to power an average of 3,600 homes for one hour. A single Megapack sells for $1,000,000.


[[File:Megapack-CleanerGrid-D.jpg]]
[[File:Megapack-CleanerGrid-D.jpg|600px]]


'''Solar Roof'''
'''Solar Roof'''
Line 411: Line 364:
Solar Roof is a roof tile.<ref name=":4" /> What makes the tile unique is that it's the most aesthetically-beautiful, energy generation roof tile. In other words, it's the most beautiful roof tile that generates electricity.  
Solar Roof is a roof tile.<ref name=":4" /> What makes the tile unique is that it's the most aesthetically-beautiful, energy generation roof tile. In other words, it's the most beautiful roof tile that generates electricity.  


[[File:5c603e0d86d2c7c005d1df44a jVVOsV8.jpg]]
{{{Cover Image|[[File:5c603e0d86d2c7c005d1df44a jVVOsV8.jpg|600px]]}}}


For the average house in the US, the total cost of having the solar roof is $59,700, or around $3,078 per year over the expected lifetime of the roof (the key assumptions used to determine the expected cost can be found in the table below). To help put the cost into perspective, the average energy bill in the United States is $1,380 per year, so, at the moment, meeting the energy needs of the average US household using the Tesla Solar Roof is 2x more expensive than the alternative.
For the average house in the US, the total cost of having the solar roof is $59,700, or around $3,078 per year over the expected lifetime of the roof (the key assumptions used to determine the expected cost can be found in the table below). To help put the cost into perspective, the average energy bill in the United States is $1,380 per year, so, at the moment, meeting the energy needs of the average US household using the Tesla Solar Roof is 2x more expensive than the alternative.
Line 462: Line 415:
# Develop a self-driving capability that is 10x safer than manual, via massive fleet learning; and
# Develop a self-driving capability that is 10x safer than manual, via massive fleet learning; and
# Enable your car to make money for you when you aren't using it.
# Enable your car to make money for you when you aren't using it.
It's worth noting that 10 years earlier than the publication of the 2016 blog post, Elon detailed the company's first master plan<ref name=":9" />, and the company has managed to achieve all of the milestones, which were as follows:
It's worth noting that 10 years earlier than the 2016 blog post, Elon detailed the company's first master plan<ref name=":9" />, and the company has managed to achieve all of the milestones, which were as follows:


#Build a sports car (i.e. the Tesla Model S);
#Build a sports car (i.e. the Tesla Model S);
Line 474: Line 427:


Here, the total addressable market (TAM) is defined as the global automotive market, and based on a number of assumptions, it is estimated that the size of the market as of today (30th May 2022), in terms of revenue, is $3.0 trillion.
Here, the total addressable market (TAM) is defined as the global automotive market, and based on a number of assumptions, it is estimated that the size of the market as of today (30th May 2022), in terms of revenue, is $3.0 trillion.
It can be strongly argued that given the company's mission, the total addressable market is actually the global energy market; and research suggests that the estimated size of that market is $6.1 trillion.<ref name=":16" />


===Serviceable Available Market===
===Serviceable Available Market===
Line 511: Line 462:
[[File:Elon Musk Royal Society (crop2).jpg|200px]]
[[File:Elon Musk Royal Society (crop2).jpg|200px]]


The Chief Executive Officer of Tesla is {{#property:P169|from=Q478214}} and he has served the position since October 2008 and as a member of the Board since April 2004. Elon has also served as Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technology Officer and Chairman of Space Exploration Technologies Corporation, an advanced rocket and spacecraft manufacturing and services company (“SpaceX ”), since May 2002, and served as Chairman of the Board of SolarCity Corporation, a solar installation company, from July 2006 until its acquisition by Tesla in November 2016. Elon is also a founder of The Boring Company, an infrastructure company, and of Neuralink Corp., a company focused on developing brain-machine interfaces. Prior to SpaceX, Elon co-founded PayPal, an electronic payment system, which was acquired by eBay in October 2002, and Zip2 Corporation, a provider of Internet enterprise software and services, which was acquired by Compaq in March 1999. Elon has also served on the board of directors of Endeavor Group Holdings, Inc. since April 2021. Elon holds a B.A. in physics from the University of Pennsylvania and a B.S. in business from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
Elon Musk is the Chief Executive Officer of Tesla and has served the position since October 2008 and as a member of the Board since April 2004. Elon has also served as Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technology Officer and Chairman of Space Exploration Technologies Corporation, an advanced rocket and spacecraft manufacturing and services company (“SpaceX ”), since May 2002, and served as Chairman of the Board of SolarCity Corporation, a solar installation company, from July 2006 until its acquisition by Tesla in November 2016. Elon is also a founder of The Boring Company, an infrastructure company, and of Neuralink Corp., a company focused on developing brain-machine interfaces. Prior to SpaceX, Elon co-founded PayPal, an electronic payment system, which was acquired by eBay in October 2002, and Zip2 Corporation, a provider of Internet enterprise software and services, which was acquired by Compaq in March 1999. Elon has also served on the board of directors of Endeavor Group Holdings, Inc. since April 2021. Elon holds a B.A. in physics from the University of Pennsylvania and a B.S. in business from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.


====Chief Financial Officer====
====Chief Financial Officer====
Line 551: Line 502:
Ira has served as the Chairman of the Silicon Valley Technology Innovation & Entrepreneurship Forum (SVIEF) for many years. He is also an active leader at Stanford University, where he has served on the Board of Visitors of Stanford Law School and is currently an advisory board member of the Stanford Global Climate and Energy Project (GCEP) and the Stanford Precourt Institute for Energy (PIE) Advisory Council. Ira has also been a guest lecturer, including helping to teach a course on Venture Capital. In addition, Ira served for many years on the Advisory Board of the Forum for Women Entrepreneurs (FWE).
Ira has served as the Chairman of the Silicon Valley Technology Innovation & Entrepreneurship Forum (SVIEF) for many years. He is also an active leader at Stanford University, where he has served on the Board of Visitors of Stanford Law School and is currently an advisory board member of the Stanford Global Climate and Energy Project (GCEP) and the Stanford Precourt Institute for Energy (PIE) Advisory Council. Ira has also been a guest lecturer, including helping to teach a course on Venture Capital. In addition, Ira served for many years on the Advisory Board of the Forum for Women Entrepreneurs (FWE).


<noglossary>‎Ira received his JD/MBA from Stanford Graduate School of Business and Stanford Law School, where he was an Associate Editor of Stanford Law Review. He holds a B.A. from the University of California, Los Angeles, graduating Phi Beta Kappa and Summa Cum Laude.</noglossary> 
Ira received his JD/MBA from Stanford Graduate School of Business and Stanford Law School, where he was an Associate Editor of Stanford Law Review. He holds a B.A. from the University of California, Los Angeles, graduating Phi Beta Kappa and Summa Cum Laude.  


'''Larry Ellison'''
'''Larry Ellison'''
Line 589: Line 540:
==Financials==
==Financials==


{{Tesla's revenue}}
'''Tesla revenues over the lifetime of the company'''
 
[[File:Tesla revenues over the lifetime of the company.png]]
 
=== Historic ===
=== Historic ===


Line 600: Line 554:
==== All periods ====
==== All periods ====
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+Financials<ref>Source: Stockhub Limited</ref><ref group="Note" name="Note04" /><ref>Source: Stockhub Limited</ref><ref name="Note04" group="Note" />
|+Historic financials<ref>Source: Stockhub Limited</ref><ref group="Note" name="Note04" />
|-
|-
!Year  
!Year  
Line 616: Line 570:
!'''16'''
!'''16'''
!'''17'''
!'''17'''
!18
!18
!19
!20
!21
!22
!23
!24
!25
!26
!27
!28
!29
!30
!31
!32
!33
!34
!35
!36
!37
!38
!39
!40
!41
!42
!43
!44
!45
!46
!47
!48
!49
!50
!51
!52
!53
!54
!55
!56
!57
!58
!59
|-
|-
|'''Year end date'''||'''31/12/2005'''||'''31/12/2006<ref name=":12">{{cite web|url=https://www.mercurynews.com/2014/07/14/2006-san-carlos-start-up-tesla-seeks-sexier-electric-car/|title=2006: San Carlos start-up Tesla seeks sexier electric car|date=July 14, 2014}}</ref><ref name="SEC">{{cite web | url=https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1318605 | title=Tesla, Inc. TSLA on Nasdaq | publisher=[[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]]}}</ref>'''||'''31/12/2007'''||'''31/12/2008'''||'''31/12/2009'''
|'''Year end date'''||'''31/12/2005'''||'''31/12/2006<ref name=":12">{{cite web|url=https://www.mercurynews.com/2014/07/14/2006-san-carlos-start-up-tesla-seeks-sexier-electric-car/|title=2006: San Carlos start-up Tesla seeks sexier electric car|date=July 14, 2014}}</ref><ref name="SEC">{{cite web | url=https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1318605 | title=Tesla, Inc. TSLA on Nasdaq | publisher=[[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]]}}</ref>'''||'''31/12/2007'''||'''31/12/2008'''||'''31/12/2009'''
|'''31/12/2010<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2010<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2011<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2011<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2012<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2012<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2013<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2013<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2014<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2014<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2015<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2015<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2016<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2016<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2017<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2017<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2018<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2018<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2019<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2019<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2020<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2020<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2021<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2021<ref name="SEC" />'''
|'''31/12/2022'''
|-
|'''31/12/2022'''
| colspan="18" |<div style="text-align: center;">'''Income statement'''</div>
|'''31/12/2023'''
|-
|'''31/12/2024'''
|Revenues ($'million)|| 0||0||0.073||15||112
|'''31/12/2025'''
|117
|'''31/12/2026'''
|204
|'''31/12/2027'''
|413
|'''31/12/2028'''
|2,013
|'''31/12/2029'''
|3,198
|'''31/12/2030'''
|4,046
|'''31/12/2031'''
|7,000
|'''31/12/2032'''
|11,759
|'''31/12/2033'''
|21,461
|'''31/12/2034'''
|24,578
|'''31/12/2035'''
|31,536
|'''31/12/2036'''
|53,823
|'''31/12/2037'''
|-
|'''31/12/2038'''
|Net profits ($'million)||style="color: red;" |-12||style="color: red;" |-30||style="color: red;" |-78||style="color: red;" |-83|| style="color: red;" |−56
|'''31/12/2039'''
|style="color: red;" |−154
|'''31/12/2040'''
|style="color: red;" |−254
|'''31/12/2041'''
|style="color: red;" |−396
|'''31/12/2042'''
|style="color: red;" |−74
|'''31/12/2043'''
|style="color: red;" |−294
|'''31/12/2044'''
|style="color: red;" |−889
|'''31/12/2045'''
|style="color: red;" |−675
|'''31/12/2046'''
|style="color: red;" |−1,962
|'''31/12/2047'''
|style="color: red;" |−976
|'''31/12/2048'''
|style="color: red;" |−862
|'''31/12/2049'''
|721
|'''31/12/2050'''
|5,519
|'''31/12/2051'''
|-
|'''31/12/2052'''
| colspan="18" |<div style="text-align: center;">'''Balance sheet'''</div>
|'''31/12/2053'''
|-
|'''31/12/2054'''
|Total assets<br />($'million)
|'''31/12/2055'''
|8
|'''31/12/2056'''
|44
|'''31/12/2057'''
|34
|'''31/12/2058'''
|52
|'''31/12/2059'''
|130
|'''31/12/2060'''
|386
|'''31/12/2061'''
|713
|'''31/12/2062'''
|1,114
|'''31/12/2063'''
|2,417
|5,831
|8,068
|22,664
|28,655
|29,740
|34,309
|52,148
|62,131
|-
| colspan="18" |<div style="text-align: center;">'''Other'''</div>
|-
|-
|
|Employees
|'''Historic'''
|NA
|'''Historic'''
|70
|'''Historic'''
|268
|'''Historic'''
|252
|'''Historic'''
|514
|'''Historic'''
|899
|'''Historic'''
|1,417
|'''Historic'''
|2,914
|'''Historic'''
|5,859
|'''Historic'''
|10,161
|'''Historic'''
|13,058
|'''Historic'''
|17,782
|'''Historic'''
|37,543
|'''Historic'''
|48,817
|'''Historic'''
|48,016
|'''Historic'''
|70,757
|'''Historic'''
|99,290
|'''Historic'''
|}
|'''Forecast'''
 
|'''Forecast'''
=== Forward ===
|'''Forecast'''
 
|'''Forecast'''
====What are the financial forecasts?====
|'''Forecast'''
{| class="wikitable"
|'''Forecast'''
|+Forward financials<ref>Source: Stockhub Limited</ref><ref group="Note" name="Note04" />
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|'''Forecast'''
|
|-
|-
| colspan="61" |<div style="text-align: center;">'''Income statement'''</div>
!Year
|-
!18 !!19!!20!!21!!22
|Revenues ($'million)|| 0||0||0.073||15||112
!23
|117
!24
|204
!25
|413
!26
|2,013
!27
|3,198
!28
|4,046
!29
|7,000
!30
|11,759
!31
|21,461
!32
|24,578
!33
|31,536
!34
|53,823
!35
|81,462
!36
|$78,935
!37
|$112,257
!38
|$154,816
!39
|$207,049
!40
|$268,527
!41
|$337,721
!42
|$411,894
!43
|$487,157
!44
|$558,739
!45
|$621,448
!46
|$670,282
!47
|$701,078
!48
|$711,102
!49
|$699,445
!50
|$667,163
!51
|$617,116
!52
|$553,551
!53
|$481,510
!54
|$406,171
!55
|$332,253
!56
|$263,564
!57
|$202,749
!58
|$151,247
!59
|$109,414
|$76,757
|$52,217
|$34,448
|$22,038
|$13,673
|$8,226
|$4,799
|$2,715
|$1,490
|$793
|$409
|$205
|$99
|$47
|$21
|$9
|$4
|$2
|-
|-
|Gross profits ($'million)
|'''Year end date'''||'''31/12/2022'''||'''31/12/2023'''||'''31/12/2024'''||'''31/12/2025'''||'''31/12/2026'''
|
|'''31/12/2027'''
|
|'''31/12/2028'''
|
|'''31/12/2029'''
|
|'''31/12/2030'''
|
|'''31/12/2031'''
|
|'''31/12/2032'''
|
|'''31/12/2033'''
|
|'''31/12/2034'''
|
|'''31/12/2035'''
|
|'''31/12/2036'''
|
|'''31/12/2037'''
|
|'''31/12/2038'''
|
|'''31/12/2039'''
|
|'''31/12/2040'''
|
|'''31/12/2041'''
|
|'''31/12/2042'''
|
|'''31/12/2043'''
|
|'''31/12/2044'''
|$23,680
|'''31/12/2045'''
|$33,677
|'''31/12/2046'''
|$46,445
|'''31/12/2047'''
|$62,115
|'''31/12/2048'''
|$80,558
|'''31/12/2049'''
|$101,316
|'''31/12/2050'''
|$185,352
|'''31/12/2051'''
|$219,221
|'''31/12/2052'''
|$251,432
|'''31/12/2053'''
|$279,652
|'''31/12/2054'''
|$301,627
|'''31/12/2055'''
|$315,485
|'''31/12/2056'''
|$319,996
|'''31/12/2057'''
|$314,750
|'''31/12/2058'''
|$300,223
|'''31/12/2059'''
|$277,702
|'''31/12/2060'''
|$249,098
|'''31/12/2061'''
|$216,679
|'''31/12/2062'''
|$182,777
|'''31/12/2063'''
|$149,514
|-
|$118,604
| colspan="43" |<div style="text-align: center;">'''Income statement'''</div>
|$91,237
|-
|$68,061
|Revenues ($'million)|| $78,935||$112,257||$154,816||$207,049||$268,527
|$49,236
|$337,721
|$34,541
|$411,894
|$23,498
|$487,157
|$15,502
|$558,739
|$9,917
|$621,448
|$6,153
|$670,282
|$3,702
|$701,078
|$2,160
|$711,102
|$1,222
|$699,445
|$670
|$667,163
|$357
|$617,116
|$184
|$553,551
|$92
|$481,510
|$45
|$406,171
|$21
|$332,253
|$10
|$263,564
|$4
|$202,749
|$2
|$151,247
|$1
|$109,414
|-
|$76,757
|Operating profits ($'million)
|$52,217
|
|$34,448
|
|$22,038
|
|$13,673
|
|$8,226
|
|$4,799
|
|$2,715
|
|$1,490
|
|$793
|
|$409
|
|$205
|
|$99
|
|$47
|
|$21
|
|$9
|
|$4
|
|$2
|
|-
|
|Gross profits ($'million)||$23,680||$33,677||$46,445||$62,115||$80,558
|$11,840
|$101,316
|$16,839
|$185,352
|$23,222
|$219,221
|$31,057
|$251,432
|$40,279
|$279,652
|$50,658
|$301,627
|$123,568
|$315,485
|$146,147
|$319,996
|$167,622
|$314,750
|$186,434
|$300,223
|$201,085
|$277,702
|$210,323
|$249,098
|$213,331
|$216,679
|$209,834
|$182,777
|$200,149
|$149,514
|$185,135
|$118,604
|$166,065
|$91,237
|$144,453
|$68,061
|$121,851
|$49,236
|$99,676
|$34,541
|$79,069
|$23,498
|$60,825
|$15,502
|$45,374
|$9,917
|$32,824
|$6,153
|$23,027
|$3,702
|$15,665
|$2,160
|$10,335
|$1,222
|$6,612
|$670
|$4,102
|$357
|$2,468
|$184
|$1,440
|$92
|$815
|$45
|$447
|$21
|$238
|$10
|$123
|$4
|$61
|$2
|$30
|$14
|$6
|$3
|$1
|$1
|$1
|-
|-
|Net profits ($'million)|| style="color: red;" |-12|| style="color: red;" |-30|| style="color: red;" |-78|| style="color: red;" |-83|| style="color: red;" |−56
|Operating profits ($'million)||$11,840||$16,839||$23,222||$31,057||$40,279
| style="color: red;" |−154
|$50,658
| style="color: red;" |−254
|$123,568
| style="color: red;" |−396
|$146,147
| style="color: red;" |−74
|$167,622
| style="color: red;" |−294
|$186,434
| style="color: red;" |−889
|$201,085
| style="color: red;" |−675
|$210,323
| style="color: red;" |−1,962
|$213,331
| style="color: red;" |−976
|$209,834
| style="color: red;" |−862
|$200,149
|721
|$185,135
|5,519
|$166,065
|12,556
|$144,453
|$9,354
|$121,851
|$13,302
|$99,676
|$18,346
|$79,069
|$24,535
|$60,825
|$31,820
|$45,374
|$40,020
|$32,824
|$97,619
|$23,027
|$115,456
|$15,665
|$132,421
|$10,335
|$147,283
|$6,612
|$158,857
|$4,102
|$166,156
|$2,468
|$168,531
|$1,440
|$165,769
|$815
|$158,118
|$447
|$146,256
|$238
|$131,192
|$123
|$114,118
|$61
|$96,263
|$30
|$78,744
|$14
|$62,465
|$6
|$48,052
|$3
|$35,846
|$1
|$25,931
|$18,191
|$12,376
|$8,164
|$5,223
|$3,240
|$1,949
|$1,137
|$643
|$353
|$188
|$97
|$48
|$24
|$11
|$5
|$2
|$1
|$1
|$0
|-
|-
| colspan="61" |<div style="text-align: center;">'''Balance sheet'''</div>
|Net profits ($'million)||$9,354||$13,302||$18,346||$24,535|| $31,820
|-
|$40,020
|Total assets<br />($'million)
|$97,619
|8
|$115,456
|44
|$132,421
|34
|$147,283
|52
|$158,857
|130
|$166,156
|386
|$168,531
|713
|$165,769
|1,114
|$158,118
|2,417
|$146,256
|5,831
|$131,192
|8,068
|$114,118
|22,664
|$96,263
|28,655
|$78,744
|29,740
|$62,465
|34,309
|$48,052
|52,148
|$35,846
|62,131
|$25,931
|82,338
|$18,191
|
|$12,376
|
|$8,164
|
|$5,223
|
|$3,240
|
|$1,949
|
|$1,137
|
|$643
|
|$353
|
|$188
|
|$97
|
|$48
|
|$24
|
|$11
|
|$5
|
|$2
|
|$1
|
|$0
|
|}
|
 
|
==== What are the assumptions used to estimate the financial forecasts?====
|
 
|
{| class="wikitable"
|
|+Key inputs
|
!Description
|
!Value
|
!Commentary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
| colspan="61" |<div style="text-align: center;">'''Other'''</div>
| colspan="3" | <div style="text-align: center;">'''Revenue'''</div>
|-
|What's the estimated current size of the total addressable market?
|$2,975,000,000
|Here, the total addressable market (TAM) is defined as the global automotive market, and based on a number of assumptions<ref group="Note" name="Note01" />, it is estimated that the size of the market as of today (30th May 2022), in terms of revenue, is $2.975 billion.
|-
|What's the estimated terminal annual growth rate of the total addressable market?
|3%
|Research shows that the growth rate of the global automotive market (i.e. the total addressable market) is similar to the growth rate of global gross domestic product<ref>http://www.robertpicard.net/files/econgrowthandadvertising.pdf</ref>, which has averaged (medium) around 3% per year in the last 20 years (2001 to 2022)<ref>https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/WLD/world/gdp-growth-rate</ref>.
|-
|What's the estimated company peak market share?
|10%
|Stockhub estimates that the peak market share of Tesla is around 10%, and, therefore, suggests using the share amount here. As of 31st December 2021, Tesla's current share of the market is around 1.8%.
|-
|Which distribution function do you want to use to estimate company revenue?
|Gaussian
|Research suggests that the revenue pattern of companies is similar to the pattern produced by the Gaussian distribution function  (i.e. the revenue distribution is bell shaped)<ref>http://escml.umd.edu/Papers/ObsCPMT.pdf</ref>, so Stockhub suggests using that function here.
|-
|What is the estimated company lifespan?
|60 years
| Tesla employs around 110,000, making the company a large organisation (more than 10,000 employees), and research shows that the average lifespan of a large corporation is around 50 years.<ref>Stadler, Enduring Success, 3–5.</ref>
|-
|-
|Employees
|What's the estimated standard deviation of company revenue?
|NA
| 6 years
|70
|Another way of asking this question is this way: within how many years either side of the mean does 68% of revenue occur? Based on Tesla's current revenue amount (i.e. $54 billion) and Tesla's estimated lifespan (i.e. 60 years) and Tesla's estimated current stage of its lifecycle (i.e. growth stage), the Stockhub company suggests using 6 years (i.e. 68% of all sales happen within 6 years either side of the mean year), so that's what's used here.
|268
|-
|252
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stages</div>'''
|514
|-
|899
|How many main stages of growth is the company expected to go through?
|1,417
| 4 stages
|2,914
|Research suggests that a company typically goes through four distinct stages of cash flow growth.<ref>Levie J, Lichtenstein BB (2010) A terminal assessment of stages theory: Introducing a dynamic approach to entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 34(2): 317–350. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00377.x</nowiki></ref> Research also shows that incorporating those stages into the discounted cash flow model improves the quality of the model and, ultimately, the quality of the value estimation.<ref>Stef Hinfelaar et al.:, 2019.</ref>
|5,859
 
|10,161
 
|13,058
 
|17,782
In addition, research shows that a key way to determine the stage which a company is in is by examining the cash flow patterns of the company.<ref>Dickinson, 2010.</ref> A summary of the economic links to cash flow patterns can be found in the appendix of this report. Stockhub estimates that with Tesla's operating cash flows positive (+), investing cash flows negative (-) and its financing cash flows positive (+), the company is in the second stage of growth (i.e. the 'growth' stage), and, therefore, it has a total of three main stages of growth.
|37,543
 
|48,817
On 7th February 2022, Tesla said it currently expects: to continue to generate net positive operating cash flow as it has done in the last four fiscal years; its capital expenditures to be between $5.00 to $7.00 billion in 2022 and each of the next two fiscal years; and its ability to be self-funding to continue as long as macroeconomic factors support current trends in its sales. Accordingly, based on forward looking statements, it appears that the company is in stage two of the business lifecycle  (i.e. the 'growth' stage), and, therefore, it has a total of three main stages of growth remaining.
|48,016
|-
|70,757
|What proportion of the company lifecycle is represented by growth stage 1?
|99,290
|30%
|127,855
|Research suggests 30%.<ref name=":6">http://escml.umd.edu/Papers/ObsCPMT.pdf</ref>
|
|-
|
|What proportion of the company lifecycle is represented by growth stage 2?
|
|10%
|
|Research suggests 10%.<ref name=":6" />
|
|-
|
| What proportion of the company lifecycle is represented by growth stage 3?
|
|20%
|
| Research suggests 20%.<ref name=":6" />
|
|-
|
|What proportion of the company lifecycle is represented by growth stage 4?
|
|40%
|
|Research suggests 40%.<ref name=":6" />
|
|-
|
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 2</div>'''
|
|-
|
|Cost of goods sold as a proportion of revenue (%)
|
|70%
|
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7">http://people.stern.nyu.edu/adamodar/pdfiles/papers/younggrowth.pdf</ref>, and the margin for its peers is 70%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|}
 
=== What are the assumptions used to estimate the financial forecasts? ===
 
{| class="wikitable"
|+Key inputs
!Description
!Value
!Commentary
|-
|-
| colspan="3" | <div style="text-align: center;">'''Revenue'''</div>
|Operating expenses as a proportion of revenue (%)
|15%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 15%.
|-
|-
|What's the estimated current size of the total addressable market?
|Tax rate (%)
|$2,975,000,000
|21%
|Here, the total addressable market (TAM) is defined as the global automotive market, and based on a number of assumptions<ref group="Note" name="Note01" />, it is estimated that the size of the market as of today (30th May 2022), in terms of revenue, is $2.975 trillion.
|Research suggests that it's best to use the marginal tax rate of the country in which the company mainly operates. Tesla mainly operates in the United States, and the marginal tax rate there is 21%.
 
 
If the TAM is defined as the global energy market, then research suggests that the estimated size of the market is $6.777 trillion.<ref name=":16">https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/sustainable/sites/bartlett/files/an_exploration_of_energy_cost_ranges_limits_and_adjustment_process.pdf</ref>
|-
|-
|What is the estimated company lifespan?
|Depreciation and amortisation as a proportion of revenue (%)
|60 years
|5%
|Tesla employs around 110,000, making the company a large organisation (more than 10,000 employees), and research shows that the average lifespan of a large corporation is around 50 years.<ref>Stadler, Enduring Success, 3–5.</ref>
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 5%.
|-
|-
|What's the estimated annual growth rate of the total addressable market over the lifecycle of the company?
|Fixed capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
|3%
|15%
|Research shows that the growth rate of the global automotive market (i.e. the total addressable market) is similar to the growth rate of global gross domestic product<ref>http://www.robertpicard.net/files/econgrowthandadvertising.pdf</ref>, which has averaged (medium) around 3% per year in the last 20 years (2001 to 2022)<ref>https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/WLD/world/gdp-growth-rate</ref>.
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 15%.
|-
|-
|What's the estimated company peak market share?
|Working capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
|10%
|15%  
|The Stockhub users estimate that especially given the leadership of the company, the peak market share of Tesla is around 10%, and, therefore, suggests using the share amount here. As of 31st December 2021, Tesla's current share of the market is estimated at around 1.8%.
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 15%.
|-
|-
|Which distribution function do you want to use to estimate company revenue?
|Net borrowing ($000)
|Gaussian
|Zero
|Research suggests that the revenue pattern of companies is similar to the pattern produced by the Gaussian distribution function  (i.e. the revenue distribution is bell shaped)<ref>http://escml.umd.edu/Papers/ObsCPMT.pdf</ref>, so the Stockhub users suggest using that function here.
|Stockhub suggests that for simplicity, the net borrowing figure is zero.
|-
|-
|What's the estimated standard deviation of company revenue?
|Interest amount ($000)
| 6 years
|Zero
|Another way of asking this question is this way: within how many years either side of the mean does 68% of revenue occur? Based on Tesla's current revenue amount (i.e. $54 billion) and Tesla's estimated lifespan (i.e. 60 years) and Tesla's estimated current stage of its lifecycle (i.e. growth stage), the Stockhub users suggest using 6 years (i.e. 68% of all sales happen within 6 years either side of the mean year), so that's what's used here.
|Stockhub suggests that for simplicity, the interest amount figure is zero.
|-
|-
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stages</div>'''
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 3</div>'''
|-
|-
|How many main stages of growth is the company expected to go through?
|Cost of goods sold as a proportion of revenue (%)
| 4 stages
|55%
|Research suggests that a company typically goes through four distinct stages of cash flow growth.<ref>Levie J, Lichtenstein BB (2010) A terminal assessment of stages theory: Introducing a dynamic approach to entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 34(2): 317–350. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00377.x</nowiki></ref> Research also shows that incorporating those stages into the discounted cash flow model improves the quality of the model and, ultimately, the quality of the value estimation.<ref>Stef Hinfelaar et al.:, 2019.</ref>
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 3)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 55%.  
 
In addition, research shows that a key way to determine the stage which a company is in is by examining the cash flow patterns of the company.<ref>Dickinson, 2010.</ref> A summary of the economic links to cash flow patterns can be found in the appendix of this report. The Stockhub users estimate that with Tesla's operating cash flows positive (+), investing cash flows negative (-) and its financing cash flows positive (+), the company is in the second stage of growth (i.e. the 'growth' stage), and, therefore, it has a total of three main stages of growth. Note, to account for one-off events, the three-year average (median) amount was used to calculate the cash flows.
 
On 7th February 2022, Tesla said it currently expects: to continue to generate net positive operating cash flow as it has done in the last four fiscal years; its capital expenditures to be between $5.00 to $7.00 billion in 2022 and each of the next two fiscal years; and its ability to be self-funding to continue as long as macroeconomic factors support current trends in its sales. Accordingly, based on forward looking statements, it appears that the company is in stage two of the business lifecycle  (i.e. the 'growth' stage), and, therefore, it has a total of three main stages of growth remaining.
|-
|-
|What proportion of the company lifecycle is represented by growth stage 1?
|Operating expenses as a proportion of revenue (%)
|30%
|Research suggests 30%.<ref name=":6">http://escml.umd.edu/Papers/ObsCPMT.pdf</ref>
|-
|What proportion of the company lifecycle is represented by growth stage 2?
|10%
|Research suggests 10%.<ref name=":6" />
|-
| What proportion of the company lifecycle is represented by growth stage 3?
|20%
| Research suggests 20%.<ref name=":6" />
|-
|What proportion of the company lifecycle is represented by growth stage 4?
|40%
|Research suggests 40%.<ref name=":6" />
|-
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 2</div>'''
|-
|Cost of goods sold as a proportion of revenue (%)
|79%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7">http://people.stern.nyu.edu/adamodar/pdfiles/papers/younggrowth.pdf</ref>, and the margin for its peers is 79%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|-
|Operating expenses as a proportion of revenue (%)
|15%
|15%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 15%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 3)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 15%.
|-
|-
|Tax rate (%)  
|Tax rate (%)  
|11%
|21%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7" />, and the rate for its peers is 11%.
|Research suggests that it's best to use the marginal tax rate of the country in which the company mainly operates. Tesla mainly operates in the United States, and the marginal tax rate there is 21%.
|-
|-
|Depreciation and amortisation as a proportion of revenue (%)  
|Depreciation and amortisation as a proportion of revenue (%)  
|7%
|5%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 7%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 3)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 5%.
|-
|-
|Fixed capital as a proportion of revenue (%)  
|Fixed capital as a proportion of revenue (%)  
|10%
|3%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 10%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 3)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 3%.
|-
|-
|Working capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
|Working capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
|15%  
|10%  
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 2)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 15%.
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 10%.
|-
|-
|Net borrowing ($000)
|Net borrowing ($000)
Line 1,245: Line 1,032:
|Stockhub suggests that for simplicity, the interest amount figure is zero.
|Stockhub suggests that for simplicity, the interest amount figure is zero.
|-
|-
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 3</div>'''
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 4</div>'''
|-
|-
|Cost of goods sold as a proportion of revenue (%)  
|Cost of goods sold as a proportion of revenue (%)  
|62%
|55%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 3)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 62%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.  
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 55%.  
|-
|-
|Operating expenses as a proportion of revenue (%)
|Operating expenses as a proportion of revenue (%)
|13%
|15%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 3)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 13%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 15%.
|-
|-
|Tax rate (%)  
|Tax rate (%)  
|14%
|21%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 3)<ref name=":7" />, and the rate for its peers is 14%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|Research suggests that it's best to use the marginal tax rate of the country in which the company mainly operates. Tesla mainly operates in the United States, and the marginal tax rate there is 21%.
|-
|-
|Depreciation and amortisation as a proportion of revenue (%)  
|Depreciation and amortisation as a proportion of revenue (%)  
|4%
|5%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 3)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 4%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 5%.
|-
|Fixed capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
|3%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 3)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 3%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|-
|Working capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
|10%  
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 10%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|-
|Net borrowing ($000)
|Zero
|The Stockhub users suggest that for simplicity, the net borrowing figure is zero.
|-
|Interest amount ($000)
|Zero
|The Stockhub users suggest that for simplicity, the interest amount figure is zero.
|-
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 4</div>'''
|-
|Cost of goods sold as a proportion of revenue (%)
|99%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 99%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|-
|Operating expenses as a proportion of revenue (%)
|15%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar margin rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the margin for its peers is 15%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|-
|Tax rate (%)
|0%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar rate as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the rate for its peers is 0%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|-
|Depreciation and amortisation as a proportion of revenue (%)
|37%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 37%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|-
|-
|Fixed capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
|Fixed capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
| 1%
| 3%
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 1%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 3%.
|-
|-
|Working capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
|Working capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
| 10%  
| 10%  
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 10%. Information on the peers and the calculation of the figure used here can be found in the appendix of this report.
|Research suggests that it's best to use a similar amount as the one used by peers that are in the same growth stage (i.e. growth stage 4)<ref name=":7" />, and the amount for its peers is 10%.
|-
|-
|Net borrowing ($000)
|Net borrowing ($000)
|Zero
|Zero
|The Stockhub users suggest that for simplicity, the net borrowing figure is zero.
|Stockhub suggests that for simplicity, the net borrowing figure is zero.
|-
|-
|Interest amount ($000)
|Interest amount ($000)
|Zero
|Zero
|The Stockhub users suggest that for simplicity, the interest amount figure is zero.
|Stockhub suggests that for simplicity, the interest amount figure is zero.
|}
|}


==Risks==
==Risks==


As with any investment, investing in Tesla carries a level of risk. Overall, based on the Tesla's adjusted beta (i.e. 2.12), the degree of risk associated with an investment in Tesla is 'high'.
As with any investment, investing in Tesla carries a level of risk. Overall, based on the key risks highlighted below, the degree of risk associated with an investment in Tesla is high.
 
Here, to estimate the adjusted beta, we used the iShares MSCI World ETF to represent the market portfolio; and in terms of the time period and frequency of observations, we used five years of monthly data (i.e. 60 observations in total), which is supported by a study and is the most common choice. The beta value in a future period has been found to be on average closer to the mean value of 1.0, and because valuation is forward-looking, it is logical to adjust the raw beta so it more accurately predicts a future beta. In addition, here, we have assumed that for an investment to be considered 'high' risk, it must have a beta value of 1.5 or more. Further information about the beta ratings can be found in the appendix section of this report.
 
The key risks can be found below. For us, currently, the biggest risk to the valuation of the company relates to the strong competition for its products and services from a growing list of established and new competitors (i.e. competition risk).


===Risks related to the ability to grow the business===  
===Risks related to the ability to grow the business===  
Line 1,381: Line 1,130:
===What's the expected return of an investment in the company?===
===What's the expected return of an investment in the company?===


The Stockhub users estimate that the expected return of an investment in the company over the next five years is negative 24%. In other words, an £1,000 investment in the company is expected to return £760 in five years time. The assumptions used to estimate the return figure can be found in the table below.
Stockhub estimates that the expected return of an investment in the company over the next five years is 72%. In other words, an £1,000 investment in the company is expected to return £1,720 in five years time. The assumptions used to estimate the return figure can be found in the table below.


Assuming that a suitable return level over five years is 10% per year and Tesla achieves its expected return level (of negative 24%), then an investment in the company is considered to be an 'unsuitable' one.
Assuming that a suitable return level over five years is 10% per year and Tesla achieves its expected return level (of 72%), then an investment in the company is considered to be a 'suitable' one.


===What are the assumptions used to estimate the return?===
===What are the assumptions used to estimate the return?===
Line 1,399: Line 1,148:
#By comparing the investment to other similar investments (i.e. relative valuation).
#By comparing the investment to other similar investments (i.e. relative valuation).


Research suggests that in terms of estimating the expected return of an investment over a period of 12-months or more, the approach that is more accurate is the discounted cash flow approach<ref name=":5">Demirakos et al., 2010; Gleason et al., 2013</ref>, so that's the approach that he Stockhub users suggest to use here; nevertheless, for completeness purposes, separately, the valuation of the company is also estimated using the using the relative valuation approach (the valuation based on the relative approach can be found in the appendix of this report).   
Research suggests that in terms of estimating the expected return of an investment over a period of 12-months or more, the approach that is more accurate is the discounted cash flow approach<ref name=":5">Demirakos et al., 2010; Gleason et al., 2013</ref>, so that's the approach that Stockhub suggests to use here; nevertheless, for completeness purposes, separately, the valuation of the company is also estimated using the using the relative valuation approach (the valuation based on the relative approach can be found in the appendix of this report).   


Tesla has never paid cash dividends, and on 7th February 2022, it said that it currently does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the Stockhub users suggest using the free cash flow valuation method (rather than the dividend discount model).  
Tesla has never paid cash dividends, and on 7th February 2022, it said that it currently does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, Stockhub suggests using the free cash flow valuation method (rather than the dividend discount model).  
|-
|-
|Which financial forecasts to use?
|Which financial forecasts to use?
| Stockhub
| Stockhub
|The only available long-term forecasts (i.e. >15 years) are the ones that are supplied by the Stockhub users (the forecasts can be found in the financials section of this report), so the Stockhub users suggest using those.
|The only available long-term forecasts (i.e. >15 years) are the ones that are supplied by the Stockhub company (the forecasts can be found in the financials section of this report), so Stockhub suggests using those.
|-
|-
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 2</div>'''  
| colspan="3" |'''<div style="text-align: center;">Growth stage 2</div>'''  
|-
|-
|Discount rate (%)
|Discount rate (%)
| 15%
| 8%
|There are two key risk parameters for a firm that need to be estimated: its cost of equity and its cost of debt. A key way to estimate the cost of equity is by looking at the beta (or betas) of the company in question, the cost of debt from a measure of default risk (an actual or synthetic rating) and apply the market value weights for debt and equity to come up with the cost of capital.
|There are two key risk parameters for a firm that need to be estimated: its cost of equity and its cost of debt. A key way to estimate the cost of equity is by looking at the beta (or betas) of the company in question, the cost of debt from a measure of default risk (an actual or synthetic rating) and apply the market value weights for debt and equity to come up with the cost of capital.
|-
|-
|Probability of success (%)
|Probability of success (%)
| 90%
| 100%
| Research suggests that a suitable rate for a company in this growth stage (i.e. stage 2) is 90%.
| Research suggests that a suitable rate for a company in this growth stage (i.e. stage 2) is 100%.


|-
|-
Line 1,421: Line 1,170:
|-
|-
|Discount rate (%)
|Discount rate (%)
| 10%
| 8%
|There are two key risk parameters for a firm that need to be estimated: its cost of equity and its cost of debt. A key way to estimate the cost of equity is by looking at the beta (or betas) of the company in question, the cost of debt from a measure of default risk (an actual or synthetic rating) and apply the market value weights for debt and equity to come up with the cost of capital.
|There are two key risk parameters for a firm that need to be estimated: its cost of equity and its cost of debt. A key way to estimate the cost of equity is by looking at the beta (or betas) of the company in question, the cost of debt from a measure of default risk (an actual or synthetic rating) and apply the market value weights for debt and equity to come up with the cost of capital.
|-
|-
Line 1,432: Line 1,181:
|-
|-
|Discount rate (%)
|Discount rate (%)
| 10%
| 8%
|There are two key risk parameters for a firm that need to be estimated: its cost of equity and its cost of debt. A key way to estimate the cost of equity is by looking at the beta (or betas) of the company in question, the cost of debt from a measure of default risk (an actual or synthetic rating) and apply the market value weights for debt and equity to come up with the cost of capital.
|There are two key risk parameters for a firm that need to be estimated: its cost of equity and its cost of debt. A key way to estimate the cost of equity is by looking at the beta (or betas) of the company in question, the cost of debt from a measure of default risk (an actual or synthetic rating) and apply the market value weights for debt and equity to come up with the cost of capital.
|-
|-
Line 1,443: Line 1,192:
|-
|-
|What's the current value of the company?
|What's the current value of the company?
|$950.54 billion
|$728.88 billion
|As at 5th June 2022, the current value of the Tesla company is $950.54 billion.
|As at 5th June 2022, the current value of the Tesla company is $728.88 billion.
|-
|-
|Which time period do you want to use to estimate the expected return?
|Which time period do you want to use to estimate the expected return?
| Between now and five years time
| Between now and five years time
|Research suggests that following a market crash, the average amount of time it takes for the price of a stock market to return to its pre-crash level (i.e. the recovery period) is at least three years.<ref>https://www.newyorkfed.org/mediabrary/media/medialibrary/media/research/staff_reports/research_papers/9809.pdf</ref> Accordingly, Stockhub suggests that to account for general market cyclicity, it's best to estimate the expected return of the company between now and five years time.
|Stockhub suggests that to account for general market cyclicity, it's best to estimate the expected return of the company between now and five years time.
|}
|}


Line 1,457: Line 1,206:
#The size of the total addressable market (the default size is $3.0 trillion);
#The size of the total addressable market (the default size is $3.0 trillion);
#Tesla peak market share (the default share is 10%); and  
#Tesla peak market share (the default share is 10%); and  
#The discount rate (the default time-weighted average rate is 10%).
#The discount rate (the default time-weighted average rate is 8%).


The impact of a 50% change in those main inputs to the expected return of the Tesla investment is shown in the table below.
The impact of a 50% change in those main inputs to the expected return of the Tesla investment is shown in the table below.
Line 1,469: Line 1,218:
|-
|-
|The size of the total addressable market
|The size of the total addressable market
|N/A
|(14%)
|(24%)
|72%
|N/A
|158%
|-
|-
|Tesla peak market share
|Tesla peak market share
|N/A
|(14%)
| (24%)
| 72%
| N/A
| 158%
|-
|-
|The discount rate
|The discount rate


|N/A
|30%
|(24%)
|72%
| N/A
| 136%


|}
|}
Line 2,139: Line 1,888:
|$312
|$312
|}
|}
{{Tesla income statement}}


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+Financial ratios
|+Income statement
!Year end date
!Year end date
!31/12/2021
!31/12/2021
Line 2,150: Line 1,897:
!31/12/2018
!31/12/2018
|-
|-
| colspan="5" |'''Liquidity Ratios'''
|Total Revenue
|$53,823
|$31,536
|$24,578
|$21,461
|-
|Cost of Revenue
|$40,217
|$24,906
|$20,509
|$17,419
|-
|-
|Current Ratio
|'''Gross Profit'''
|138%
|'''$13,606'''
| 188%
|'''$6,630'''
| 113%
|'''$4,069'''
| 83%
|'''$4,042'''
|-
|-
|Quick Ratio
|'''Operating Expenses'''
|108%
|
|159%
|
|80%
|
|52%
|
|-
|-
|Cash Ratio
|Research and Development
|90%
|$2,593
|136%
|$1,491
|59%
|$1,343
|39%
|$1,460
|-
|-
| colspan="5" |'''Profitability Ratios'''
|Sales, General and Admin.
|$4,517
|$3,145
|$2,646
|$2,835
|-
|-
|Gross Margin
|Non-Recurring Items
|25%
| style="color: red;" |-$27
|21%
| --
|17%
|$149
|19%
|$135
|-
|-
|Operating Margin
|Other Operating Items
|12%
| --
|6%
| --
|0%
| --
|0%
| --
|-
|'''Operating Income'''
|'''$6,523'''
|'''$1,994'''
|style="color: red;" |'''-$69'''
|style="color: red;" |'''-$388'''
|-
|Add'l income/expense items
| $191
| style="color: red;" |-$92
| $89
|$46
|-
|Earnings Before Interest and Tax
|$6,714
|$1,902
|$20
| style="color: red;" |-$342
|-
|-
|Pre-Tax Margin
|Interest Expense
| 12%
|$371
| 4%
|$748
| 0%
|$685
|0%
|$663
|-
|-
|Profit Margin
|Earnings Before Tax
|10%
|$6,343
|2%
|$1,154
|0%
| style="color: red;" |-$665
|0%
| style="color: red;" |-$1,005
|-
|-
|Pre-Tax ROE
|Income Tax
|21%
|$699
|5%
|$292
|0%
|$110
|0%
|$58
|-
|-
|After Tax ROE
|Minority Interest
|18%
| --
|3%
| --
|0%
| --
|0%
| --
|-
|Equity Earnings/Loss Unconsolidated Subsidiary
| style="color: red;" |-$125
| style="color: red;" |-$141
| style="color: red;" |-$87
|$87
|-
|Net Income-Cont. Operations
|$5,519
|$721
| style="color: red;" |-$862
| style="color: red;" |-$976
|-
|'''Net Income'''
|'''$5,519'''
|'''$721'''
| style="color: red;" |'''-$862'''
| style="color: red;" |'''-$976'''
|-
|'''Net Income Applicable to Common Shareholders'''
|'''$5,519'''
|'''$721'''
| style="color: red;" |'''-$862'''
| style="color: red;" |'''-$976'''
|}
|}


===Relative valuation approach===
As noted earlier in this report, research suggests that in terms of estimating the expected return of an investment over a period of 12-months or more, the approach that is more accurate is the discounted cash flow approach, so that's the approach that Stockhub suggests using to determine the estimated value of the company (the valuation based on the discounted cash flow approach can be found in the valuation section of this report); nevertheless, for completeness purposes, separately, the valuation of the company is also estimated using the relative valuation approach.
====What's the expected return of an investment in Tesla using the relative valuation approach?====
Accordingly, Stockhub estimates that the expected return of an investment in Tesla Inc over the next five years is 4.4x. In other words, an £1,000 investment in the company is expected to return £4,400 in five years time.  The assumptions used to estimate the return figure can be found in the table below.
Assuming that a suitable return level over five years is 10% per year and Tesla achieves its expected return level (of 4.4x), then an investment in the company is considered to be a 'suitable' one.
====What are the assumptions used to estimate the return figure?====
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+Key inputs
|+Financial ratios
!Description
!Year end date
!Value
!31/12/2021
!Commentary
!31/12/2020
!31/12/2019
!31/12/2018
|-
|-
| Which type of multiple do you want to use?
| colspan="5" |'''Liquidity Ratios'''
| Growth-adjusted EV/sales
| For the numerator, the Stockhub users believe that to account for the different financial leverage levels of its peers, it's best to use enterprise value (EV), rather than price. For the denominator, the Stockhub users believe that because it expects Tesla to reinvest almost all of its revenue back into the business  over the five year forecast period and therefore its earnings are expected to be abnormally low over the period, it's best to use sales. Accordingly, the Stockhub users suggest valuing its company using the EV/sales ratio. However, the Stockhub users think that to take into account the different business lifecycle stages of its peers, the most suitable valuation multiple to use is the growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple<ref group="Note" name="Note15" />, rather than the EV/sales multiple.
|-
|-
|In regards to the growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple, for the sales figure, which year to you want to use?
|Current Ratio
 
|138%
|Year 5
| 188%
|Stockhub suggests that with sales forecast to grow exponential over the five year forecast period, it's best to use forward-looking data, rather than historic data.
| 113%
 
| 83%
 
In regards to the growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple, for the sales figure, Stockhub suggests that in order to account for the forecasted exponential growth of the business, it's best to use one at the end of the forecast period (i.e. Year 5).
|-
|-
|In regards to the growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple, for the sales growth figure, which year(s) do you want to use?
|Quick Ratio
|Year 6 to 8, from now
|108%
|Stockhub suggests that for the sales growth figure, it's best to use Year 6 to 8.
|159%
|80%
|52%
|-
|-
|In regards to the growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple, what multiple figure do you want to use?
|Cash Ratio
|89x
|90%
|In Stockhub's view, Tesla closest peer is [[Apple, Inc.|Apple, Inc]]. [[Apple, Inc.|Apple, Inc]] trades on a multiple of 89x.
|136%
|59%
|39%
|-
|-
|Which financial forecasts to use?
| colspan="5" |'''Profitability Ratios'''
|Stockhub
|The only available forecasts are the ones that are supplied by the Stockhub company (the forecasts can be found in the financials section of this report), so Stockhub suggests using those.
|-
|-
| What's the current value of the Stockhub company?
|Gross Margin
|$688 billion
|25%
|As at 21st May 2022, the current value of its company at $688 billion.
|21%
|17%
|19%
|-
|-
|Which time period do you want to use to estimate the expected return?
|Operating Margin
|Between now and five years time
|12%
|Stockhub suggests that to account for general market cyclicity, it's best to estimate the expected return of the company between now and five years time.
|6%
|}
|0%
 
|0%
===Tesla peer(s)===
 
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|+Valuation table
|-
|-
!Investments!! Industry !!Enterprise value/sales!!1-year forward revenue growth rates (%)!!Growth-adjusted enterprise value/sales ratio
|Pre-Tax Margin
|-
| 12%
| [[Apple, Inc.|Apple, Inc]]||Internet content & communication||7.27x<ref name=":0">Morningstar, Inc.</ref>||8.20%<ref name=":0" />|| style="background: blue; color: white;" |89x
| 4%
|}
| 0%
{| class="wikitable"
|+Tesla peers
!Peer
!Three-year average COGS margin (%)
!Three-year average SG&A margin (%)
!Three-year average tax margin (%)
!Three-year average depreciation rate (%)
!Three-year average fixed capital margin (%)
!Three-year average change in working capital ($000)
!Three-year average growth stage
!Discount rate
|-
|Rivian Automotive, Inc.
|945%
|6827%
|0%
|0%
|358%
|3262%
|7,569,000
|1
|NA
|-
|-
|Tesla, Inc.
|Profit Margin
|79%
|15%
|11%
|7%
|10%
|10%
|3,121,828
|2%
|2
|0%
|14.96%
|-
|Apple, Inc
|62%
|13%
|14%
|4%
|3%
| -18,780,000
|3
|9.91%
|-
|Workhorse Group
|938%
| -6077%
|0%
|0%
|58%
|411%
| -2,978
|4
|18.75%
|-
|-
|Cenntro Electric Group Limited
|Pre-Tax ROE
|90%
|21%
|209%
|5%
|0%
|0%
|37%
|0%
|0%
|138,382
|4
|10.44%
|-
|-
|Liaoning SG Automotive Group Co
|After Tax ROE
|99%
|15%
|18%
|18%
|8%
|3%
|1%
|154,153
|4
|6.39%
|}
{| class="wikitable"
|+Growth stage
!Growth stage
!Three-year average COGS margin (%)
!Three-year average SG&A margin (%)
!Three-year average tax margin (%)
!Three-year average depreciation rate (%)
!Three-year average fixed capital margin (%)
!Three-year average change in working capital ($000)
!Discount rate
|-
|One
|945%
|6827%
|0%
|0%
|358%
|3262%
|7,569,000
|NA
|-
|Two
|79%
|15%
|11%
|7%
|10%
|3,121,828
|14.96%
|-
|Three
|62%
|13%
|14%
|4%
|3%
| -18,780,000
|9.91%
|-
|Four
|99%
|15%
|0%
|0%
|37%
|1%
|138,382
|10.44%
|}
|}


==== Apple Inc. ====
===Relative valuation approach===
{| class="wikitable"
As noted earlier in this report, research suggests that in terms of estimating the expected return of an investment over a period of 12-months or more, the approach that is more accurate is the discounted cash flow approach, so that's the approach that Stockhub suggests using to determine the estimated value of the company (the valuation based on the discounted cash flow approach can be found in the valuation section of this report); nevertheless, for completeness purposes, separately, the valuation of the company is also estimated using the using the relative valuation approach.
|+Cost of equity (%)
!Input
!Input value
!Additional information
|-
|Risk-free rate (%)
|3.44%
|Here, the risk free rate is the US 30 year treasury bond, and is calculated as at 15th September 2022.
|-
|Beta
|1.23
|The asset’s beta measures its market or systematic risk, which in theory is the sensitivity of its returns to the returns on the “market portfolio” of risky assets. Concretely, beta equals the covariance of returns with the returns on the market portfolio divided by the market portfolio’s variance of returns. In typical practice for equity valuation, the market portfolio is represented by a broad value-weighted equity market index. The asset’s beta is estimated by a least squares regression of the asset’s returns on the index’s returns.


In the typical case in which the equity risk premium is based on a national equity market index and estimated beta is based on sensitivity to that index, the assumption is being made implicitly that equity prices are largely determined by local investors. When equities markets are segmented in that sense (i.e., local market prices are largely determined by local investors rather than by investors worldwide), two issues with the same risk characteristics can have different required returns if they trade in different markets.
====What's the expected return of an investment in Tesla using the relative valuation approach?====


The opposite assumption is that all investors worldwide participate equally in set- ting prices (perfectly integrated markets). That assumption results in the international CAPM (or world CAPM) in which the risk premium is relative to a world market portfolio. In practice, the international CAPM is not commonly relied on for required return on equity estimation.
Accordingly, Stockhub estimates that the expected return of an investment in Tesla Inc over the next five years is 4.4x. In other words, an £1,000 investment in the company is expected to return £4,400 in five years time.  The assumptions used to estimate the return figure can be found in the table below.


For estimating the required return on the equity using the Capital Asset Pricing Model, in terms of time period, and frequency of observations, the most common choice is five years of monthly data, yielding 60 observations. One study of U.S. stocks found support for five years of monthly data over alternatives. An argument can be made that the 2 years, weekly data can be especially appropriate in fast growing markets.
Assuming that a suitable return level over five years is 10% per year and Tesla achieves its expected return level (of 4.4x), then an investment in the company is considered to be a 'suitable' one.


The beta value in a future period has been found to be on average closer to the mean value of 1.0, the beta of an average-systematic-risk security, than to the value of the raw beta. Because valuation is forward looking, it is logical to adjust the raw beta so it more accurately predicts a future beta.
====What are the assumptions used to estimate the return figure?====
 
The figure here is taken from Yahoo Finance (https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/quote/AAPL?p=AAPL&.tsrc=fin-srch), on 16th September 2022.
|-
|Equity risk premium (%)
|{{#lst:Template:Regional weighted average equity risk premium|Global weighted average equity risk premium}}
|The equity risk premium is the incremental return (premium) that investors require for holding equities rather than a risk-free asset (e.g., government bills or government bonds). Thus, it is the difference between the required return on equities and a specified expected risk-free rate of return. The equity risk premium, like the required return, depends strictly on expectations for the future because the investor’s returns depend only on the investment’s future cash flows.
Note: the definition of risk-free asset used in estimating the equity risk premium should correspond to the one used in specifying the current expected risk-free return.
 
Typically, analysts estimate the equity risk premium for the national equity market of the issues being analyzed (but if a global CAPM is being used, a world equity premium is estimated that takes into account the totality of equity markets).
 
'''Historical estimates'''
 
A historical equity risk premium estimate is usually calculated as the mean value of the differences between broad-based equity-market-index returns and government debt returns over some selected sample period. When reliable long-term records of equity returns are available, historical estimates have been a familiar and popular choice of estimation. If investors do not make systematic errors in forming expectations, then, over the long term, average returns should be an unbiased estimate of what investors expected. The fact that historical estimates are based on data also gives them an objective quality.
 
In using a historical estimate to represent the equity risk premium going forward, the analyst is assuming that returns are stationary—that is, the parameters that describe the return-generating process are constant over the past and into the future.
 
'''Forward-looking estimates'''
 
Because the equity risk premium is based only on expectations for economic and financial variables from the present going forward, it is logical to estimate the premium directly based on current information and expectations concerning such variables. Such estimates are often called forward-looking or ex ante estimates. In principle, such estimates may agree with, be higher, or be lower than historical equity risk premium estimates. Ex ante estimates are likely to be less subject to an issue such as non-stationarity or data biases than historical estimates. However, such estimates are often subject to other potential errors related to financial and economic models and potential behavioural biases in forecasting.
 
Here, the equity risk premium is in relation to the global region, and is calculated as at 1st January 2022 (<nowiki>https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/ctryprem.html</nowiki>).
|-
|Cost of equity (%)
|9.91%
|Cost of equity = Risk-free rate + Beta x Equity risk premium.
|}
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+Key financials
|+Key inputs
!Description
!Description
!Value
!Value
!Commentary
!Commentary
|-
|-
|Cost of goods sold as a proportion of revenue (%)
| Which type of multiple do you want to use?
|62%
| Growth-adjusted EV/sales
|The Stockhub users suggest that to account for one-off events, it's best to take the three-year average (median) amount.
| For the numerator, Stockhub believes that to account for the different financial leverage levels of its peers, it's best to use enterprise value (EV), rather than price. For the denominator, Stockhub believes that because it expects Tesla to reinvest almost all of its revenue back into the business  over the five year forecast period and therefore its earnings are expected to be abnormally low over the period, it's best to use sales. Accordingly, Stockhub suggests valuing its company using the EV/sales ratio. However, Stockhub feels that to take into account the different business lifecycle stages of its peers, the most suitable valuation multiple to use is the growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple<ref group="Note" name="Note15" />, rather than the EV/sales multiple.  
|-
|-
|Operating expenses as a proportion of revenue (%)
|In regards to the growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple, for the sales figure, which year to you want to use?
|13%
 
|The Stockhub users suggest that to account for one-off events, it's best to take the three-year average (median) amount.
|Year 5
|Stockhub suggests that with sales forecast to grow exponential over the five year forecast period, it's best to use forward-looking data, rather than historic data.
 
 
In regards to the growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple, for the sales figure, Stockhub suggests that in order to account for the forecasted exponential growth of the business, it's best to use one at the end of the forecast period (i.e. Year 5).  
|-
|-
|Tax rate (%)
|In regards to the growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple, for the sales growth figure, which year(s) do you want to use?
|14%
|Year 6 to 8, from now
|The Stockhub users suggest that to account for one-off events, it's best to take the three-year average (median) amount.
|Stockhub suggests that for the sales growth figure, it's best to use Year 6 to 8.
|-
|-
|Depreciation and amortisation as a proportion of revenue (%)
|In regards to the growth-adjusted EV/sales multiple, what multiple figure do you want to use?
|4%
|89x
|The Stockhub users suggest that to account for one-off events, it's best to take the three-year average (median) amount.
|In Stockhub's view, Tesla closest peer is [[Apple]]. [[Apple]] trades on a multiple of 89x.
|-
|-
|Fixed capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
|Which financial forecasts to use?
|{{#expr:trunc(11085000/365817000*100)}}% 
|Stockhub
|The Stockhub users suggest that to account for one-off events, it's best to take the three-year average (median) amount.
|The only available forecasts are the ones that are supplied by the Stockhub company (the forecasts can be found in the financials section of this report), so Stockhub suggests using those.
|-
|-
|Working capital as a proportion of revenue (%)
| What's the current value of the Stockhub company?
|{{#expr:trunc((134836000-125481000)/365817000*100)}}% 
|$688 billion
|The Stockhub users suggest that to account for one-off events, it's best to take the three-year average (median) amount.
|As at 21st May 2022, the current value of its company at $688 billion.
|-
|-
|Net borrowing ($000)
|Which time period do you want to use to estimate the expected return?
|${{formatnum:{{#expr:trunc(15613000+109106000-62639000)}}}}
|Between now and five years time
|The Stockhub users suggest that to account for one-off events, it's best to take the three-year average (median) amount.
|Stockhub suggests that to account for general market cyclicity, it's best to estimate the expected return of the company between now and five years time.
|-
|Interest amount ($000)
|$2,645,000
|The Stockhub users suggest that to account for one-off events, it's best to take the three-year average (median) amount.
|}
|}


==== Cenntro Electric Group Limited ====
===Tesla peer(s)===


{{Cenntro Electric Group Limited cost of equity calculation}}
{| class="wikitable sortable"
{{Cenntro Electric Group Limited key financials}}
|+Valuation table
|-
!Investments!! Industry !!Enterprise value/sales!!1-year forward revenue growth rates (%)!!Growth-adjusted enterprise value/sales ratio
|-
| [[Apple]]||Internet content & communication||7.27x<ref name=":0">Morningstar, Inc.</ref>||8.20%<ref name=":0" />|| style="background: blue; color: white;" |89x
|}


===Economic links to cash flow patterns ===
===Economic links to cash flow patterns ===
Line 2,673: Line 2,332:
|Agriculture, Forestry and Land Use
|Agriculture, Forestry and Land Use
|}
|}
=== Liquidity ===
Our assessment reveals that Tesla's shares exhibit a high level of liquidity, as evidenced by its bid-ask margin of 0.0297%. To gauge the bid-ask margin, we divided the ask-bid spread by the ask price. Our criterion for classifying an investment as 'highly' liquid is a bid-ask margin of 1% or less. For more details on liquidity ratings, please refer to the appendix section of this report.
Furthermore, the average daily trading volume of Tesla, Inc. shares is 132,160,233 for 30 days and 127,970,670 for 90 days, which, based on the current share price (i.e. $168.29), equates to a share value of $22.24 billion and $21.54 billion.
{| class="wikitable"
|+Tesla bid-ask margin
!Metric
!Amount
|-
|Bid price (USD)
|168.24
|-
|Ask price (USD)
|168.29
|-
|Spread (USD)
|0.05
|-
|Margin (%)
|0.0297
|}
{| class="wikitable"
|+Average Tesla shares trade volume
!Days
!Average shares volume
|-
|30 days
|   132,160,233
|-
|90 days
|  127,970,670
|}
{| class="wikitable"
|+Tesla shares trade volume over the last 90 days
!Date
!Volume
|-
|28/04/2023
|        122,515,800
|-
|01/05/2023
|        109,015,000
|-
|02/05/2023
|        128,259,700
|-
|03/05/2023
|        119,728,000
|-
|04/05/2023
|          95,108,500
|-
|05/05/2023
|        107,440,900
|-
|08/05/2023
|        112,249,400
|-
|09/05/2023
|          88,965,000
|-
|10/05/2023
|        119,840,700
|-
|11/05/2023
|        103,889,900
|-
|12/05/2023
|        157,577,100
|-
|15/05/2023
|        105,592,500
|-
|16/05/2023
|          98,288,800
|-
|17/05/2023
|        125,473,600
|-
|18/05/2023
|        109,520,300
|-
|19/05/2023
|        136,024,200
|-
|22/05/2023
|        132,001,400
|-
|23/05/2023
|        156,952,100
|-
|24/05/2023
|        137,605,100
|-
|25/05/2023
|          96,870,700
|-
|26/05/2023
|        162,061,500
|-
|30/05/2023
|        128,818,700
|-
|31/05/2023
|        150,711,700
|-
|01/06/2023
|        148,029,900
|-
|02/06/2023
|        164,129,000
|-
|05/06/2023
|        151,143,100
|-
|06/06/2023
|        146,911,600
|-
|07/06/2023
|        185,710,800
|-
|08/06/2023
|        164,489,700
|-
|09/06/2023
|        199,882,300
|-
|12/06/2023
|        150,337,900
|-
|13/06/2023
|        162,384,300
|-
|14/06/2023
|        170,575,500
|-
|15/06/2023
|        160,171,200
|-
|16/06/2023
|        167,563,700
|-
|20/06/2023
|        165,611,200
|-
|21/06/2023
|        211,797,100
|-
|22/06/2023
|        166,875,900
|-
|23/06/2023
|        176,584,100
|-
|26/06/2023
|        179,990,600
|-
|27/06/2023
|        164,968,200
|-
|28/06/2023
|        159,770,800
|-
|29/06/2023
|        131,283,400
|-
|30/06/2023
|        112,267,600
|-
|03/07/2023
|        119,685,900
|-
|05/07/2023
|        131,530,900
|-
|06/07/2023
|        120,332,100
|-
|07/07/2023
|        113,602,000
|-
|10/07/2023
|        119,425,400
|-
|11/07/2023
|          91,972,400
|-
|12/07/2023
|          95,672,100
|-
|13/07/2023
|        112,681,500
|-
|14/07/2023
|        119,771,100
|-
|17/07/2023
|        131,569,600
|-
|18/07/2023
|        112,434,700
|-
|19/07/2023
|        142,355,400
|-
|20/07/2023
|        175,158,300
|-
|21/07/2023
|        161,050,100
|-
|24/07/2023
|        136,508,500
|-
|25/07/2023
|        112,757,300
|-
|26/07/2023
|          95,856,200
|-
|27/07/2023
|        103,697,300
|-
|28/07/2023
|        111,446,000
|-
|31/07/2023
|          84,582,200
|-
|01/08/2023
|          83,166,000
|-
|02/08/2023
|        101,752,900
|-
|03/08/2023
|          97,569,100
|-
|04/08/2023
|          99,242,600
|-
|07/08/2023
|        111,097,900
|-
|08/08/2023
|          96,642,200
|-
|09/08/2023
|        101,596,300
|-
|10/08/2023
|        109,498,600
|-
|11/08/2023
|          98,866,600
|-
|14/08/2023
|          98,595,300
|-
|15/08/2023
|          88,197,600
|-
|16/08/2023
|        112,484,500
|-
|17/08/2023
|        120,718,400
|-
|18/08/2023
|        135,813,700
|-
|21/08/2023
|        135,702,700
|-
|22/08/2023
|        130,597,900
|-
|23/08/2023
|        101,077,600
|-
|24/08/2023
|          99,777,400
|-
|25/08/2023
|        106,612,200
|-
|28/08/2023
|        107,673,700
|-
|29/08/2023
|        134,047,600
|-
|30/08/2023
|        121,988,400
|-
|31/08/2023
|        108,861,700
|-
|01/09/2023
|        132,272,500
|-
|05/09/2023
|        129,469,600
|-
|06/09/2023
|        116,959,800
|}


== Notes==
== Notes==
Line 3,098: Line 2,448:
[[Category:Equities]]
[[Category:Equities]]
[[Category:United States]]
[[Category:United States]]
__INDEX__
__INDEX__
Please note that all contributions to Stockhub may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Stockhub:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Stockhub entities used in this page

Templates used on this page: