Tags: New topic Visual
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== References ==
== Analyzing the Feasibility of Hacking Bitcoin ==


It is imperative that this report includes appropriate references or sources at every juncture. For instance, the statement, "Bitcoin is a form of digital currency that aims to eliminate the need for banks or governments," necessitates a proper citation. I cannot overemphasize the crucial role that references/sources play in maintaining the credibility and reliability of your report. Omitting such citations could potentially lead to the removal of the unsourced information, therefore compromising the integrity of your work. [[User:Manos|Manos]] ([[User talk:Manos|talk]]) 23:58, 19 July 2023 (BST)
Estimating the cost of acquiring enough computational power to control 51% of the Bitcoin network is complex and involves several variables. However, one can make a rough estimate based on the current hash rate of the network, the cost of the most efficient mining hardware, and operational expenses like electricity. Here’s a basic approach to such an estimation:


== Contact details ==
# '''Determine the Current Total Hash Rate:''' The total hash rate of the Bitcoin network represents the cumulative computational power used for mining. As of my last update, this was in the range of hundreds of exahashes per second (EH/s). This figure is publicly available and regularly updated on various cryptocurrency analysis websites.
# '''Calculate the Required Hash Rate for 51% Control:''' To control 51% of the network, one would need to match over half of the current total hash rate. So, if the network's hash rate is, for example, 150 EH/s, you would need a bit more than 75 EH/s.
# '''Estimate Hardware Requirements:''' Next, determine how many units of the most efficient Application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) miners are needed to achieve this hash rate. Each ASIC miner has a specific hash rate. For instance, if a high-end ASIC miner has a hash rate of 100 terahashes per second (TH/s), you would need about 750,000 such miners to reach 75 EH/s.
# '''Cost of Mining Hardware:''' Multiply the number of required ASIC miners by the cost per unit. If each miner costs, say, $2,500, the total cost for the hardware alone would be in the vicinity of $1.875 billion.
# '''Operational Costs:''' Factor in the cost of electricity, cooling, maintenance, and infrastructure. These costs vary greatly depending on location and setup but can be significant, especially given the energy requirements of such a large mining operation.
# '''Additional Considerations:''' Remember that this is a simplification. In reality, amassing this amount of mining power would likely drive up the costs of ASIC miners due to increased demand and limited supply. Also, the network's total hash rate could increase as other miners join the network, meaning you would need even more resources to maintain 51% control.


Hey, it's Harshvi here! What is your number? I will contact you on whatsapp :)
In conclusion, while these are ballpark figures and the actual costs would depend on dynamic factors like equipment prices, electricity rates, and the ever-changing total hash rate of the Bitcoin network, it's clear that the investment required would be enormous, likely several billion dollars. This estimate illustrates why attempting to gain 51% control of the Bitcoin network is not only technically and logistically challenging but also economically impractical.
 
:Hi Harshvi, whom is this message addressed to? [[User:Akin|Akin]] ([[User talk:Akin|talk]]) 16:22, 17 July 2023 (BST)
 
::Addressed to James Wu.
 
:::Okay, thank you. To utilise the resources and assistance of the global Stockhub community, I encourage you to converse on here. That said, you're welcome to converse off the platform. Note, you're actually able to message each other using the Stockhub platform, by typing the username of the person with whom you want to speak here: https://stockhub.co/research/Special:EmailUser [[User:Akin|Akin]] ([[User talk:Akin|talk]]) 16:31, 17 July 2023 (BST)
 
== Analyzing the Feasibility of Hacking Bitcoin: A Comparison with the Wealth of the World's Richest Individuals ==
 
The current market capitalization of Bitcoin stands at $720 billion. To successfully "hack" Bitcoin, an individual would need to gain control over 51% of this market cap, which equates to approximately $367 billion. When we look at the combined net worth of the world's two wealthiest individuals, Bernard Arnault & family and Elon Musk, their total estimated wealth amounts to $391 billion ($211 billion and $180 billion, respectively). This combined wealth surpasses the $367 billion threshold, theoretically enabling them to control, and consequently, hack Bitcoin. [[User:Manos|Manos]] ([[User talk:Manos|talk]]) 20:30, 13 November 2023 (GMT)

Latest revision as of 21:09, 28 November 2023

Analyzing the Feasibility of Hacking BitcoinEdit

Estimating the cost of acquiring enough computational power to control 51% of the Bitcoin network is complex and involves several variables. However, one can make a rough estimate based on the current hash rate of the network, the cost of the most efficient mining hardware, and operational expenses like electricity. Here’s a basic approach to such an estimation:

  1. Determine the Current Total Hash Rate: The total hash rate of the Bitcoin network represents the cumulative computational power used for mining. As of my last update, this was in the range of hundreds of exahashes per second (EH/s). This figure is publicly available and regularly updated on various cryptocurrency analysis websites.
  2. Calculate the Required Hash Rate for 51% Control: To control 51% of the network, one would need to match over half of the current total hash rate. So, if the network's hash rate is, for example, 150 EH/s, you would need a bit more than 75 EH/s.
  3. Estimate Hardware Requirements: Next, determine how many units of the most efficient Application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) miners are needed to achieve this hash rate. Each ASIC miner has a specific hash rate. For instance, if a high-end ASIC miner has a hash rate of 100 terahashes per second (TH/s), you would need about 750,000 such miners to reach 75 EH/s.
  4. Cost of Mining Hardware: Multiply the number of required ASIC miners by the cost per unit. If each miner costs, say, $2,500, the total cost for the hardware alone would be in the vicinity of $1.875 billion.
  5. Operational Costs: Factor in the cost of electricity, cooling, maintenance, and infrastructure. These costs vary greatly depending on location and setup but can be significant, especially given the energy requirements of such a large mining operation.
  6. Additional Considerations: Remember that this is a simplification. In reality, amassing this amount of mining power would likely drive up the costs of ASIC miners due to increased demand and limited supply. Also, the network's total hash rate could increase as other miners join the network, meaning you would need even more resources to maintain 51% control.

In conclusion, while these are ballpark figures and the actual costs would depend on dynamic factors like equipment prices, electricity rates, and the ever-changing total hash rate of the Bitcoin network, it's clear that the investment required would be enormous, likely several billion dollars. This estimate illustrates why attempting to gain 51% control of the Bitcoin network is not only technically and logistically challenging but also economically impractical.